If you could eliminate 90% of all war, disease, starvation, pollution, and other problems, and allowed human population to increase unhindered until the world was over 10-12 billion people, would you? Would it be worth it, knowing that there is potential for even greater loss of life from mass starvation, disease, lack of resources, or war on a much larger scale?
Name:
Anonymous2006-02-11 17:09
This is a stupid question. It assumes that people who do want to end war ETC... are too stupid to think ahead.
Name:
Anonymous2006-02-11 18:23
Humans are intelligent, they don't overpopulate and force themselves into rationning their food and starving in famines every time the climate fluctuates, they cull their own population so they don't have to suffer.
Name:
Anonymous2006-02-11 18:27
>>3
No. They will cull other populations so they don't have to suffer.
Name:
Anonymous2006-02-11 18:32
The truth is that when people are hungry, they're genetically programmed to temporarily turn into zombies and thus solve the overpopulation problem. Except for nigras, that's why we kill them with AIDS and aids.
Not necessarily true. Yes, there was a boom in population in the last 50-100 years, but look at the current child-bearing generation. Most have only one or two children, many adopt, and some choose not to have children at all. I don't see a reason to believe that this trend will not continue.
>>10
lolololol, most OPEN fudgepacking faggots.
Hope you never walk in on daddy&daddy.
Watch the movie yo, it's done by a black guy, same as boys n' the hood and mama's boy. He knows from whence he speaketh!
White people will believe anything negative about a black person, ESPECIALLY if a black person says it. They will however, have a harder time believing in positives. (Unless, it's "HIV positive", amirite?)
Name:
Anonymous2006-02-14 13:35
>>12
Everyone focuses on negatives because it affects them more. Quit blaming everything wrong in the world on "duh man *drool* *grunt*". If a white person commits a crime, go right ahead and prosecute that person to serve as a deterant against that crime and get the criminal off the streets. If whites do the same thing you and everyone else does then focussing your vindictiveness on whites alone won't solve that problem. Besides being critical rather than praiseworthy isn't much of a problem, insults and flattery are more problematic. Also the fact that liberals are hypocritical when it comes to issues of race and driving many whites to racism is a bigger problem.
You are inferior if you cannot understand my argument, so sit here and read it 30 times if you can't understand it and ask a legitimate question if by pure chance it doesn't make any grammatical sense.