Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon.

Pages: 1-

proof of climate change

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-19 6:41

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-19 10:59

just because the climate changes does not mean that we caused it or that it's unnatural or that it's gonna stay that way unless we do something about it.

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-19 13:18

I have proof of climate change...one day it was raining and the next it was sunny..WE'RE ALL GONNA DIE!!! SAVE US AL GORE!!

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-19 15:19

I'm praying for climate change.  I can't afford to move and the weather where I live is terrible.  I'm hoping for a drier, warmer one if it's not too much trouble.

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-20 13:07

>>4
How about this? Climate change happens and your dead so you don't have to worry about the weather at all!

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-20 14:00

>>5
Why would I be dead?

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-20 19:25

>>5
your dead
What about his ``dead''

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-21 3:51

>>6
too hot, planet engulfed in water

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-21 4:51

Climate change is just a new religion that atheists cling to, to fill in that void of being irreligious, to redistribute wealth through carbon taxes, unlike a Christian church that kindly asks for a small donation in the collection plate, and to basically give them some kind of purpose in life.

Ironic, they've become the very thing they railed against.

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-21 7:24

>>9
pretty much; the populace is always going to be stupid

the best thing to do is to wed a jewess and take advantage of them

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-21 10:21

>>8
Kevin Costner already solved the "planet engulfed in water" problem.

On the other hand, the "too hot" part always had me puzzled: if the gases causing the atmosphere to provide the planet with less solar protection was also acting as a heat resistor, why wouldn't those gases also affect the sunlight reaching the planet in the first place?

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-21 11:23

>>11
how did he solve it?

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-21 11:46

>>12
Gills on the neck.  And jet skis.

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-21 16:00

>>11
I'm sorry, are you referring to some bad plot point or another in the movie, or are you mixing up the ozone hole and the greenhouse effect, with little understanding of either?

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-21 16:03

>>14
Shh.  I'm trying to bait people.

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-21 21:15

I hate the Earth. I love to destroy the environment.

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-23 13:02

You can hate earth, but remember, if you destroy it, you will lose your planet, and I doubt you will be able to survive it(no food, no water, no air, ...).

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-23 14:25

>>17
Gee, I never looked at it that way...Are you saying if the earth is destroyed,... then there will be no more earth? Do you have proof to back up that claim?

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-24 4:57

>>18
He's a troll, there's no way the Earth can possibly be destroyed without something really major. Refer to http://qntm.org/destroy

Global warming is just another Jew scam to collect even more money from the stupid, gullible goyim.

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-24 6:17

I offer proof of climate stability. The instability of any climate is stability.

:/

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-24 9:32

>>19
So you disagree that if sea level rises occur people won't drown?

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-24 11:16

>>21
Not if they can swim.  Or, you know, build things that can float.

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-24 13:01

>>21
Even if that happens, it won't destroy the Earth. Read the page.

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-26 17:14

>>23
I think you are taking the phrase "destroy the Earth" to literally.  If you think people think that it will make the planet blow up or something, then that's retarded.

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-26 19:44

>>24
* too
then that's retarded.
As is the whole notion of man-made global warming.

Name: Anonymous 2010-08-17 15:28

Come on Nibaru!
Crack this shit-hole open like the rotten egg it is, let it dump into the sun and fry!
3000 years to work out a utopia:
FAIL!
Pull the plug.

Name: Anonymous 2010-08-19 9:19

>implying TED isn't a shithole for people who have too much money

Name: Anonymous 2010-08-19 17:46

>>26
dude what tht fuc
>>25
obtuse nonsense from you

Name: Anonymous 2010-08-20 21:48

>>28
HURR what you say is nonsense
Nice argument, Charlie.

Name: Anonymous 2010-08-27 17:08

I was going to make a post about how only internet trolls are climate change sceptics, but then i thought "why bother".
You're never going to change your mind and the actual debate occurs in peer reviewed journals and international committees.

But as long as i'm already typing; the point isn't that we're blowing up the earth. The point is that it's going to be harder to grow food, harder to find fresh water and if sea levels rise, many many people will need to relocate and all this puts a big strain on a world that is already running out of resources.
Climate models certainly aren't prophecies but the opposition doesn't seem to do any modelling of their own. Instead, they're content with criticising the work of scientists doing the best they can while saying "It's not mankinds fault, so why should we care?".

Name: Anonymous 2010-08-27 18:07

>>30
Which resources are we running out of again?

Name: Al Gore 2010-08-27 19:43

>>31
Food, water, and air , you dingy.

If we don't give Al Gore and his friends 9 trillion dollars we'll all be dead by the 22nd of next month.

Name: Anonymous 2010-08-27 20:25

>>32
That's funny, big agribusinesses have been sucking up all the food resources for decades, but I guess we'll never about the damage they do to the poor, poor planet in one of your seminars, will we, Mr. Gore?

Name: Anonymous 2010-08-27 21:44

>>32
Even I'm clever enough to know that if the Earth was running out of (breathable) air there'd be no solution money could buy.

Name: Anonymous 2010-08-28 3:02

>>32
Phosphorus and petroleum aren't critical yet but we only have tree or four decades left.

Name: Anonymous 2010-08-30 2:18

>>32
You aren't very convincing with your hyperbole.  I conclude that you are not Al Gore.  You really slipped up in the second sentence, when "you" refer to yourself in the third person.

Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List