Still NEET loser

why people refuse to help me with any programming job: http://www.job-mo.ru/community/31/14314/

is this that hard to just give someone a programmer job?

          O
     o
   o
⌙ (⏖)


LE MEME PIPE

>>41
You call that a meme pipe?


                   ._rGDWM4KKW4mNmDGDWWmmL__
                 _r8\KMM48|/D844d\bK+d@Kb*VM8W_,
               m@@Z88/K4548!,\7YK5((t\Y87)/)TM58j
             :45K5D@)\G\Z,,5(-/-!)D,\DT`K/.(bN))ZG
            d8@D@GZZ,-!L!K`,+D,-.T4K !;!NbL!8-8-(8|
           WMK8K8Wq88N/VLVb\!8,.. 5W- t|!Zr)8!KK:K8m_
          j@88KW4WMW8@888GMK`W5..!-W))\!|K8(W!D|G@DK8D;
         |WM8W8G@!@8W8MK8b8W)GD|!b|4K4|N8W@G8MKW5WM@8GW!
        .88@W8MWMM5PK@8G88@KKWK8Md48D@|VW88W8M8)+\888888L
        :8Z@8@88VZZZZKNV58M8@W88K888@|dM8M(+f!- )-Z884((8,
        K85K4MG)))))X(((5(*D@8DW8K8554(Y/)'!'--/!-(M8Z))8|
        @D@8@)D((((!/\\\)\Y!/(5M4Z))\!'-.!`-! !/'\ 885(58|
       |MMMKW5N)'!-',/!.`.\- !\\\'/,/,/- -.\ - -/--!8K!V8W
       |8M58KDD)\`,\ -..` -,-/-`,-.-!.` !'/,/'/.-(-`W8/!88
       |@8@WDK4!\!! -!---!-,(.((.\--\-`-!`-\.'/ !)!\V4((88
       |8K8M5(())\-,'\`-/-!.---- /!!`!`- !\- -! -! -)8))8W
       |88@88Xt!\!-!-. !-\-.-!`-`,--.'-'\-`/`,. !|-,K8Z/8@
       |8@8@G)ZK-\` -,-,\.`,! /!--`/'-'!-./.-,-,))!-K8((8K
       `8W8K5(D)\--\'\`-( ---!!!!/!`!/.-!--'!,\`((\!4WD)8@
        888@GGZ((!( \- )--'!/.---.'/'!'-'`!` -'-\)-.88K(8K
       :(K88tNZ)-/jZmKLKK-/ -'/\-.`-/.'JjGGdJjJ,/K/ D8W\8b
       VNVZ8)K@//Pf+fM888W!!-`-` --.',448@88+MZmG|! V8W8@/|
       |DGZZ)DKV(.'\:__)Z)8/,'(!!`/,!rG)\!!.! -`+))!/W85(P
       !8K(5(5q)))))7J\((5(4q'\-/-.\4(((/+\)))/!!((\ 88)G|
       |GWG\)Z,`KW//88ND\8888(!! /j8ZDKDNMMM/44,/\)\ K84@;
       !Z8Z//\'!\\.,GKq',|\N5|. -\//(Y' :MLN..M- \)7 @WM5;
       !KKK\((`-`- / ..\((/|V|-'\ \'-!!\\//'!,\`!`(- 8Z8Z
       `DGD)))`/./(\(\)))!!)Z/`!(` '!,\)))_(-\ -,'!!'K((K
        4t(\(\'- /'!\\~!`.-\5;\'/ \`.-! ,\'!'  - ! - N\8!
        V!8\-/ '- -.`.- - -\N /-`- - -- - ',`-  ! .'-b\);
        :'4;-)! --`. - ,!-';|.-(./,/`/'/'! .`  ',-!! b-T-
         ((K`(\-'- !- . .!((/.-\-:-!`-/-` ,',' '.`\-!K /'
         `\) )D!! - -  /))!G`.`!!`( /!)L/ - -` ',,) |`~'
           ` /WZ, -' _f/|/!\!-,',-\-,P\`Kb,- --..(/,!
            !(NZr/ /d\\\44MW(t-!/jW@T-\! DG/')//(((.!
            /)8(K((((//GDZWG@GM445(`/!-,-T5K((K/D))-'
            !(KD8G)\):8WK84W488D@\ ,-./!`,\NN))))Z//
             DDZ|/-//4WW88848ZZ!`,,_j\DW8K8Z-!!!t5(-
             VG)\b!-!.58P~!~\*+((++Y~\!8@P!\(\!!Z))'
             `K/-D))!/)KMm.          .q45`-)-- /K(/
              \K/(/--.+DDG8WD-\+-==/~/Z)\.',// K+/
               K|/D!,'(5888KqL_/j::q!`\-,-..'-d8\'
               !|//;- GM885((!-!)\!,\`-\.--- !DG'
                5-((-\88@))D))J..(\\\)\,/- /-(Wt'
                `|-\G88@~/4KKKDD))))7(!.-`,'/GK!
         ,       `d888@!!DDGt!7/7/`\'\-.'- \MD!
     .-._; -,    d5K4K!\(DZ)!',\-\\-',/'/'/KW~
    /'jW8f d8\ .W8)GZ))\T((\/( !!!,-`.`.\!(W'
   : 48ff j@8WjMZK4Z`KK(NZ)!) !,-,-/.'-\/=8'
   _ ` .,/K888885W*  Y4G)KN/.!,,\-\.-,\rG@'
   48@8W/ V(8K848Z    `NKWNK44(Zj)GGGG5Wf
   `88KM4  88@88@        '~~~~YfM4M4Z+~
    V888@) 5WM8P
     M8Rob.M88f
     `*88888*'
       `YY~'

THIS IS A MEME PIPE

>>42
>2013
>must resort to selectric typewriter art to display an image in a forum
>proto meme Bob Dobbs
>the >>42 implication
>subtle evocation of the even older Matisse meme
LLLLLLLLLLLLEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEELLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL IM SUCH LE GRO NERD
>DEFINITELY AN AUTIST LEL GRO XDDD

>>43
Holy fuck, /g/ shitstain. This "LEL" shit was a stupid way of mocking /g/ shits like you, not a widely-approved way of replying to a post you don't like.

Why don't you go back there: http://boards.4chan.org/g/

>>43
Who in the godliving fuck are you trying to quote (because you didn't even get the quotes right), cum/g/uzzler?

>>44
>>45
LLLLLLLLEEEEEEEEEEEELLLLLLLLLLLL
>STOP BEIN SO EGIN, GROZE
>UR KILLING ME XDDDDDDDDDDDD

>>44
>implying you didn't bring it on yourselves

>>44
Actually the "LEL" shit was a stupid way of mocking the stupid french ass who created the stupid "E/G/IN" word as a stupid way of mocking imaginary people from /g/.

>>39
yes it is possible ^^
I bet you had sex with most of /prog/ denizens: Sussman sadomized with his trousers snake, while you diligently licked the froze void.

>>37
Why not? That is valid intimidation: if I won't get a job, then I would have to take my revenge on society. Children are hold dear in our society, so promising to harm a child should have some effect on persons refusing me programming job. Do they want me to feast on they children or they want me to get a job?

this board is really exactly like that Shreddinger story with the cats for me (the observer cat in this case, but read the whole thing its quite mind blowing)
if I don't visit then its a good board but I can never know because if I visit then it turns to a state of shit exactly like the guy who open the box and find the cats are all dead!

>>50
they don't want you anywhere near them, their family or their cat.

>>50
Nikita, I just want to say that there would never be another person that could ever take your place. No one else could say something so messed up and make it sound rational. But with that said you shouldn't have that on your resume if you are seeking employment.

>>53
Ok. You look like a nice person. While you are here, what are the prerequisites to read articles like "Solubility enhancement of paclitaxel using a linear-dendritic block copolymer" (http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378517313003864)

are there something like SICP or other intro book for this kind of papers?

>>3
why does she post a lot of porn?

>>54
I'm interested in reading this article, because paclitaxel looks is important for virus design and could be used to cell devision.

>>56
could be used to control cell division.
self fix

>>54
what are the prerequisites to read articles like "Solubility enhancement of paclitaxel using a linear-dendritic block copolymer"
Well, a first grade education for starters.

>>58
Where can I get it, if I have no school education?

>>54
Chemistry (especially organic chemistry), statistics, physics, human anatomy, molecular biology, and biochemical medicines.

are there something like SICP or other intro book for this kind of papers?
Haha, no. Computer science is by far the simplest field in math or science by virtue of being the youngest. It needs only 80 or so years of background. You can't write an introduction to a field that has over 500 years of study put into it in a single book.

And I'm not even going to bother making you a reading list since we all know that you're just going to call them jewish and not learn a fucking thing from them.

>>60
And I'm not even going to bother making you a reading list since we all know that you're just going to call them jewish and not learn a fucking thing from them.
There is not a single tutorial written by a goy on the subject of cell biology? What happened to all these Japanese and British scientists? They left no school book?

>>60
You can't write an introduction to a field that has over 500 years of study put into it in a single book.
Most of 500 years were in circles and the basic structures should be simple, if you replace latin names with plain english. I.e. write W₂L (Water 2 LSD) instead of H₂O

>>61
There is not a single tutorial written by a goy on the subject of cell biology?
Why would there be a tutorial written about cell biology at all? That's not something you work on in your garage.

What happened to all these Japanese and British scientists?
They still involve things like quantum effects in photosynthesis or infinitesimal electrons to do chemical bonding. You wouldn't be interested.

And honestly the fact that you're still obsessed over the source of the information (as if it would be any different if a goy wrote it) shows that you don't really want to learn how to accomplish your goal. You want to feel like you are doing something: pretending to learn while still maintaining your `ideology' that demands that you exclude all things you perceive Jewish, no matter how fundamental it is to your cause or how much it hurts you to insist.

How do I keep getting dragged into writing this shit? I don't even like you. You threatened to hurt my lolies, I hate you now.

>>62
Most of 500 years were in circles and the basic structures should be simple, if you replace latin names with plain english.
Would math be simpler if we changed the names of the numbers? Pushing notation around can only simplify it a certain extent, and that certain extent is lost once a good understanding of the subject is achieved anyway.

write W₂L (Water 2 LSD) instead of H₂O
Oh my fucking god. Do you have any clue what you are writing? Kill yourself. KILL YOURSELF. You are not fit to do any sort of chemistry. I wouldn't trust you to mix baking soda and vinegar. Wow.

>>63
Why would there be a tutorial written about cell biology at all? That's not something you work on in your garage.
well if there is an OS writing tutorial (http://wiki.osdev.org/Tutorials), why there can't be a molecular biology tutorial/howto?

They still involve things like quantum effects in photosynthesis or infinitesimal electrons to do chemical bonding. You wouldn't be interested.
Can't they be stripped of infinity? I.e. use a "list of atoms" instead of "continuous space"

And honestly the fact that you're still obsessed over the source of the information (as if it would be any different if a goy wrote it) shows that you don't really want to learn how to accomplish your goal
Why should I love Jews?

>>64
Would math be simpler if we changed the names of the numbers? Pushing notation around can only simplify it a certain extent, and that certain extent is lost once a good understanding of the subject is achieved anyway.
It would be, if we rename "infinity" and "infinitesimal" to "error"

Oh my fucking god. Do you have any clue what you are writing? Kill yourself. KILL YOURSELF. You are not fit to do any sort of chemistry. I wouldn't trust you to mix baking soda and vinegar. Wow.
That is why I'm asking for directions. And I was deprived of school education, which excuses my ignorance. You cant blame a nigger from African village for his ignorance in math.

THERE CANNOT BE FINITE WITHOUT INFINITE

>>65
well if there is an OS writing tutorial (http://wiki.osdev.org/Tutorials), why there can't be a molecular biology tutorial/howto?
Because it would be pointless to write one.

Can't they be stripped of infinity? I.e. use a "list of atoms" instead of "continuous space"
See, this is exactly why you will never get anywhere. You're going to wait around for perfection instead of working with what you've got. You can't understand abstractions and the concept of modeling. Do you know why science uses those things? Because it works. Even if it isn't how the universe truly operates, it predicts everything perfectly within the scope that we can measure. If it can't be measured, it's meaningless and unscientific. Scientists aren't going to rewrite everything just to please someone like you who can't understand such a simple thing.

Why should I love Jews?
This is another thing. I never said that you have to love Jews. You can hate them. You can dream of killing them. But if you want to get anywhere, you're going to have to learn from them.

>>66
It would be, if we rename "infinity" and "infinitesimal" to "error"
No, it wouldn't, it would just be changing the name. You can say ``As x approaches infinity'' or ``As x increases without bound'', but it has the same meaning. And giving up infinitesimals means giving up calculus, which means giving up all of physics since the 1400s. A ``pure'' discrete mathematics is not worth it.

That is why I'm asking for directions. And I was deprived of school education, which excuses my ignorance. You cant blame a nigger from African village for his ignorance in math.
If he claims that voodoo is superior and that the White Man is using science as imperialism, I can call him a stupid ignorant nigger, and I would be right.

>>67
There cannot be a correct solution, without incorrect one?

>>70
shut up you dumb russian

>>69
No, it wouldn't, it would just be changing the name. You can say ``As x approaches infinity'' or ``As x increases without bound'', but it has the same meaning. And giving up infinitesimals means giving up calculus, which means giving up all of physics since the 1400s. A ``pure'' discrete mathematics is not worth it.
It would! Because assuming existence of N+1 for any natural N is an error.

See, this is exactly why you will never get anywhere. You're going to wait around for perfection instead of working with what you've got. You can't understand abstractions and the concept of modeling.
You don't need infinitesimals for modelling. You can still accept that there is some N, for which there is no N+1.

Because it would be pointless to write one.
And writing OS tutorial isn't pointless? At least biology tutorial could promote healthy life-style, while OS tutorials are just harmful waste of time and bits.

This is another thing. I never said that you have to love Jews. You can hate them. You can dream of killing them. But if you want to get anywhere, you're going to have to learn from them.
Why can't we learn from Japanese instead? At least they have no Yahweh.


If he claims that voodoo is superior and that the White Man is using science as imperialism, I can call him a stupid ignorant nigger, and I would be right.
I never claimed such things.

>>71
finite = correct
infinite = incorrect

>>68
unscientific
big deal, it seems the labrats have tiny minds with technology that is quite simple compared to superior civilization out there

needing to measure everything
stupid close minded autists
typical applied math scum

>>70
Tautology.¬(S)=¬S Every solution that is not the correct solution is an incorrect solution.

>>75
u think ur smart kid
i bet u aint godel level

>>72
It would! Because assuming existence of N+1 for any natural N is an error.
You don't need infinitesimals for modelling. You can still accept that there is some N, for which there is no N+1.
Whatever, I don't care. Believe what you want. There is no amount of arguing or proofs that I can present that will dissuade you.

And writing OS tutorial isn't pointless? At least biology tutorial could promote healthy life-style, while OS tutorials are just harmful waste of time and bits.
Anyone can write an OS. Even tdavis can and he's fucking crazy. You can't see the results of molecular biology experiments without expensive equipment that is out of reach for 99% of people. The only people who would benefit from such a tutorial would be students, and they already have textbooks and lectures for that. Then there is the fact that a tutorial is something that glosses over most of the topic and just shows how to use the basics. There is no tutorial on the technical workings of the linux kernel scheduler because anyone who was going to do anything with it would have the resources to read the real documentation or the source.

Why can't we learn from Japanese instead? At least they have no Yahweh.
The western world write science. Japan entered the game far too late to provide any useful basis on their own. They use the same foundations of science that the west uses.

I never claimed such things.
Yeah....

>>74
That's real fuckin' neato!

>>77
Whatever, I don't care. Believe what you want. There is no amount of arguing or proofs that I can present that will dissuade you.
Can you prove, that matter is infinite?

Anyone can write an OS. Even tdavis can and he's fucking crazy.
What is the point in his OS?

You can't see the results of molecular biology experiments without expensive equipment that is out of reach for 99% of people.
Can't you do a molecular simulation?

The only people who would benefit from such a tutorial would be students, and they already have textbooks and lectures for that.
Can you take me as a student? What should I do to become one? Why college refuse to admit persons without school degree?

The western world write science. Japan entered the game far too late to provide any useful basis on their own. They use the same foundations of science that the west uses.
Yet the scientific foundation could be cleansed of its religious parts, that the calculus. I'm sure you can sum an integral without mathematics. Just take sufficiently small quantities.

Then there is the fact that a tutorial is something that glosses over most of the topic and just shows how to use the basics.
Then what should I do, if I want to work in molecular biology?

Yet the scientific foundation could be cleansed of its religious parts, that the calculus. I'm sure you can sum an integral without mathematics. Just take sufficiently small quantities.

wat

>>75
Your tautology isn't an existential theorem. You just claimed:

(¬(S) = ¬S) → ∃¬S

Which could be used to prove untrue theorems.