>>72
It would! Because assuming existence of N+1 for any natural N is an error.
You don't need infinitesimals for modelling. You can still accept that there is some N, for which there is no N+1.
Whatever, I don't care. Believe what you want. There is no amount of arguing or proofs that I can present that will dissuade you.
And writing OS tutorial isn't pointless? At least biology tutorial could promote healthy life-style, while OS tutorials are just harmful waste of time and bits.
Anyone can write an OS. Even tdavis can and he's fucking crazy. You can't see the results of molecular biology experiments without expensive equipment that is out of reach for 99% of people. The only people who would benefit from such a tutorial would be students, and they already have textbooks and lectures for that. Then there is the fact that a tutorial is something that glosses over most of the topic and just shows how to use the basics. There is no tutorial on the technical workings of the linux kernel scheduler because anyone who was going to do anything with it would have the resources to read the real documentation or the source.
Why can't we learn from Japanese instead? At least they have no Yahweh.
The western world write science. Japan entered the game far too late to provide any useful basis on their own. They use the same foundations of science that the west uses.
I never claimed such things.
Yeah....
>>74
That's real fuckin' neato
!