>>1
Have you tried emailing well-respected professors on the matter? You could try sending a few hundred emails to Gerald Sussman (his email address is easily found in the web), he'll surely admire your perseverance for that.
And keep us up-to-date!
Name:
Anonymous2013-02-20 0:14
Learn Haskell. If you're a small-minded toilet scrubber, it'll blow your mind. I, on the other hand, had no problem understanding monads, kinds, monadic I/O, and continuations.
Name:
Anonymous2013-02-20 0:20
>>5
Understanding monads was a complete waste of time, they only taught me what I already knew and provided a shitty awkward and useless abstraction.
Name:
Anonymous2013-02-20 0:21
>>6
True, but you need to grok them if you want to dig the Haskell jive.
Name:
Anonymous2013-02-20 0:30
>>7
Writing idiomatic Haskell code with zygohistomorphic rectomorphisms left and right reminds me of this quote (yes, I know the author is an insufferable faggot annoying person but even a stopped clock is right twice a day): Sometimes, you’re on a team, and you’re busy banging out the code, and somebody comes up to your desk, coffee mug in hand, and starts rattling on about how if you use multi-threaded COM apartments, your app will be 34% sparklier, and it’s not even that hard, because he’s written a bunch of templates, and all you have to do is multiply-inherit from 17 of his templates, each taking an average of 4 arguments, and you barely even have to write the body of the function. It’s just a gigantic list of multiple-inheritance from different classes and hey, presto, multi-apartment threaded COM. And your eyes are swimming, and you have no friggin’ idea what this frigtard is talking about, but he just won’t go away, and even if he does go away, he’s just going back into his office to write more of his clever classes constructed entirely from multiple inheritance from templates, without a single implementation body at all, and it’s going to crash like crazy and you’re going to get paged at night to come in and try to figure it out because he’ll be at some goddamn “Design Patterns” meetup.
I would much rather stick with my Lisp.
Ha! What shall the structure of imperative programs be? Which category can express the full nature of imperative programs and even more? HAhAhAhahashash, it's a monad.
Python will poison your soul as the beast it is. Haskell will change the nature of programming. In the future only pure mathematicians can program. It will purify the world.
>>10,11,13,17,20-21
What the Hell? Why you are advertising FIoC?
I am going back to my Scheme λ's.
Name:
Anonymous2013-02-20 22:39
Don't listen to these jews and and buy into their kike languages OP, learn Symta and you'll be coding with God. What kind of code do you think God would write, OP? Surely he would write an algorithm that calculates the best way to get rid of parasites like the east khazars.