>>5
Same thing happens with Yuri. Is like "George" in Russia, but in japanese games there's some Yuris that are female. In this moment i'm thinking of Yuri from KOF, and Juri (pronounced the same) in SF4.
So Yuri is like a girl's name in lots of minds. I don't, when i think of the name Yuri i think of Yuri Gagarin.
Also, I don't think I wanted to see his actual face. It was better left up to the imagination.
Name:
Anonymous2013-02-06 11:00
Nikita is the hero we need and deserve.
With the power of Smyta we shall smyta the JEWS and the marxists.
Name:
Anonymous2013-02-06 12:58
>>9
Nikita is a russian name, you irrelevant 3rd world country
Name:
Anonymous2013-02-06 13:00
>>13
Hey, Nikitahmed, it's you! Tell us, why aren't you wearing a turban in that picture?
Name:
Anonymous2013-02-06 14:32
>>14
because russian headdress is kokoshnik, not turban.
Name:
Anonymous2013-02-06 15:46
By the way, it's the Nikita who single-handedly caused numerous programming forums to descend into antisemitic/anti-antisemitic trolling war and chaos. And he did so as a side-effect of advertising his own programming language which is apparently very practical (but I'm not sure since there's no docs). This guy is a fucking genius.
Name:
Anonymous2013-02-06 15:51
>>16 single-handedly caused numerous programming forums to descend into antisemitic/anti-antisemitic trolling war and chaos
That is why he gets banned everywhere.
Every time I see his name I'm reminded of that Luc Besson film about an assassin chick.
Name:
Anonymous2013-02-07 5:37
>>29 that Luc Besson film about an assassin chick.
So, every one of them?
Name:
Anonymous2013-02-07 9:34
>>29
Ever time I hear "Luc Besson", I'm reminded about movie Leon, with Natalie Portman and Jean Reno - both of whom are Jewish. Fifth Element too features a some Jewish cast, Milla Jovovich being descendant of Soviet dissident Jews. BTW, does Luc Besson have some Jewish ancestry?
>>31
Oh, Nikitá, you so jelly. Consider this: if you do a circumcision and find a Jewish women, at least your children would belong to the master race.
Name:
Anonymous2013-02-07 10:29
>>32
If all Jews die, then goyim would become master race.
Name:
Anonymous2013-02-07 10:43
>>33
If all humanoids die, then, in absence of presence, cats would become master race.
" The Jews, however, are beyond all doubt the strongest, toughest, and purest race at present living in Europe, they know how to succeed even under the worst conditions (in fact better than under favourable ones), by means of virtues of some sort, which one would like nowadays to label as vices--owing above all to a resolute faith which does not need to be ashamed before "modern ideas", they alter only, WHEN they do alter, in the same way that the Russian Empire makes its conquest--as an empire that has plenty of time and is not of yesterday--namely, according to the principle, "as slowly as possible"! A thinker who has the future of Europe at heart, will, in all his perspectives concerning the future, calculate upon the Jews, as he will calculate upon the Russians, as above all the surest and likeliest factors in the great play and battle of forces. That which is at present called a "nation" in Europe, and is really rather a RES FACTA than NATA (indeed, sometimes confusingly similar to a RES FICTA ET PICTA), is in every case something evolving, young, easily displaced, and not yet a race, much less such a race AERE PERENNUS, as the Jews are such "nations" should most carefully avoid all hot-headed rivalry and hostility! It is certain that the Jews, if they desired--or if they were driven to it, as the anti-Semites seem to wish--COULD now have the ascendancy, nay, literally the supremacy, over Europe, that they are NOT working and planning for that end is equally certain. Meanwhile, they rather wish and desire, even somewhat importunely, to be insorbed and absorbed by Europe, they long to be finally settled, authorized, and respected somewhere, and wish to put an end to the nomadic life, to the "wandering Jew",--and one should certainly take account of this impulse and tendency, and MAKE ADVANCES to it (it possibly betokens a mitigation of the Jewish instincts) for which purpose it would perhaps be useful and fair to banish the anti-Semitic bawlers out of the country."
I just found this in Beyond Good and Evil, by your beloved Nietzsche. What say you?
Name:
Anonymous2013-02-07 14:54
>>38
Shalom, Hymie! I've to admit, that Confucianism is far superior to your ugly Abrahamism.
>>49
It originally was, when OP-kike tried to troll antisemite Nikite. Now this thread is about why the Jews must be killed for all people on the earth to be happy.
Are there any great poet of the Jews? Not one. Among the Jews so the number of all four personalities: Pasternak, Heine, Mandelstam and Brodsky. Poets such a level in every Russian town of rundown on the top ten. Call these great poets ordinary can only Jews and their lackeys, eager, for want of a better, to praise any Jewish mediocrity. The most interesting was Pasternak. But then again, what is interesting? His poetic translations. Transfers are good. Pasternak translated from English, German and French top Western poets and tried to borrow from them poetic images and presenting them as his own. Similar translations and borrowings engaged and Brodsky. Steal someone else and pass off his own - a typical method of Jewish genius. But, despite all the borrowing, and poetry of Pasternak, Brodsky's poetry and leave a miserable experience. Jews do not have the spark of God. Not surprisingly, the Jewish Nobel Prize Committee awarded the "Ig Nobel" prize, and Pasternak and Brodsky.
>>55 They love that particular JEW.
They also love all these Moses and Aaron Jews.
Still, if you tell them about your interest for Jewish culture, they will call you a brainwashed shabbos goy.
They themselves interested in Jewish culture, because they study Jewish history (Bible), instead of their own.
>>58
Don't kill the JEWS! (ノД`)・゜・。 (´°̥̥̥̥̥̥̥̥ω°̥̥̥̥̥̥̥̥｀)
Name:
Anonymous2013-02-07 16:57
>>59
If we kill Jews, you can take Sussman's place and I'll be Abelson. We will write our own, goyish SICP! Just imagine all the possibilities Jewish death opens to us!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Avedon
Avedon was born in New York City to a Jewish Russian family. He was the son of Jacob Israel Avedon, a Russian-Jewish immigrant who started a successful retail dress business on Fifth Avenue
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_Revson
His father Samuel Revson was born in Lithuania and of a Russian Jewish heritage. His mother Jeanette Weiss Revson was born in Austro-Hungary of German Jewish ancestry.
Wikipedia is full of Jews
Name:
Anonymous2013-02-07 18:03
>>75
A Jew who says "I'm an atheist" still says "I'm a Jew."
A Jew who says "I'm a Buddhist" still says "I'm a Jew."
Jews consider their ethnicity more fundamental than religious beliefs. Jews use religion as a cover for their ethnocentrism.
Name:
Anonymous2013-02-07 18:05
>>77
I.e. Mila Jovovic was typical Jewish girl, helped by her immigrant tribesmen.
>>79
Milica Jovovic is from a very Orthodox family. But you wouldn't understand, filthy muslim.
Now, the fact that she is a slut, whoring herself for career, sleeping with Jew producers and marrying a morbidly obese retarded french is another problem.
>>78
What does that pasta have to do with anything?
Eating non-kosher food won't make you less of a Jew, because the Jew ethnicity doesn't have anti-kosher stomaches. They eat kosher food because of their religion.
Please use kopipe only when it's actually needed.
Name:
Anonymous2013-02-07 19:08
>>86
I'm sure you can condition a rat or other vermin to avoid certain kinds of food.
Name:
Anonymous2013-02-07 19:10
>>85
Serbian people are Orthodox Christians, like Russians (and unlike the tataroid muslim scum where you belong)
Name:
Anonymous2013-02-07 19:18
>>88
I'm Russian and the only "Orthodox" here are these Chabad Jews ("Men in Black", as we call them). Fucking scary bastards, wearing medieval dress, like vampires or something.
>>95 I hate everything Abrahamic, so it will pleasure me when Muslims start butcher christians or vice versa. World needs less idiots.
You hate everything Abrahamic, except Islam. You always side with Muslims, no matter what, and you call Christians Shabbo-Goyim. Who do you think you are fooling Ahmed?
Name:
Anonymous2013-02-08 2:09
>>104
That's because christians ARE fucking shabbos goyim. At least the muslims aren't fooled by the jews and brazenly and openly oppose them and are doing the right thing by at least trying to get rid of the jews.
Name:
Anonymous2013-02-08 2:15
>>105
Yeah, I see everyday how Saudi Arabia and Qatar oppose them.
>>104
I do hate Islam, but now we have unique opportune to pit christfags against muslims, so they will annihilate each other. So I play Muslim to incite hatred.
>>109 now we have unique opportune to pit christfags against muslims, so they will annihilate each other. So I play Muslim to incite hatred.
Very jewish strategy.
Name:
Anonymous2013-02-08 16:28
>>114
The standard proper response to his post is a shalom!
Name:
Anonymous2013-02-08 17:16
>>114
Yeah. Jews always were my teachers. I adore their intelligence.
Another christfag whore loses here stupid feminist head and meets the Jesus!
Name:
Anonymous2013-02-09 19:53
>>130
Love how she whines "неубивай родной неубивай пожалуйста" (dont kill me good man dont kill me please) and tries to seduce mighty Chechen with her ugly body. That makes you wishing to see her slow death.
You fap to images of Russians killed by Chechens. Russsians don't do that.
Besides you already confessed being a Muslim a few years ago. The post is still in the archives.
Name:
Anonymous2013-02-09 20:38
>>138
I'm not, because I reject my parent's Christianity.
>>137
No. My father is Christian. He visits church regularly.
>>139 You fap to images of Russians killed by Chechens. Russsians don't do that.
I was rejected by other Russians (who are mostly christfags or commies), so I've to search allies elsewhere. I dislike Jews, so Muslims are obvious choice. I would have chosen Asians, but they are
1. unnoticeable minority, rarely leaving their home republics;
2. non-militant Buddhist or Pagan people;
3. too shy for my liking.
Besides you already confessed being a Muslim a few years ago. The post is still in the archives.
Nope. I just admire Chechens for their overall coolness, swastikas and wolf symbolics.
>>152
He had access to superior russian forums and superior russian documentation.
Name:
Anonymous2013-02-09 23:09
>>150
Doubt that. She seemingly has a dislike for antichrists.
>>151
She wasnt. She was just crazy and judging by her surname and photos she is 1/2 Jewish. She also blocked me, so she wont see any of my antisemitic posts.
>>152
Like most of you, I started coding from poking video game memory to hack XP and money. It all ended in http://sym.at.ua/load/sau_v1_1/1-1-0-4 and in the end I was able to do more complicated stuff, like teleporting characters by changing X,Y or making screenshots of whole playfield, by programmatically changing viewport origins.
Name:
Anonymous2013-02-09 23:09
>>154
Her last comment was that "racism is idiotic"
Name:
Anonymous2013-02-09 23:27
>>155
Unlike homophobia, which is totally kosher by Christian standards.
Name:
Anonymous2013-02-09 23:36
She was nice to you, but you're too dumb. You don't want a girlfriend, you don't want friends... You know what? I give up, Nikita. I like you but I can't help you.
I don't know about you guys, but knowing that gay marriage exists here now has hurt marriage. Whenever I try and fuck my wife, all I can think about is two sweaty, heaving male bodies joined together in government sanctioned disgusting decadent man sex with large calloused hands grasping and moist gasping lips joined with giant throbbing cocks ohh yeah
>>167
Sorry. I havent attended school, so dont know what are "General Relativity" or "String Theory". The only thing I know about physics is that Feynman and Einstein are kikes and that E=MC^2
Name:
Anonymous2013-02-10 0:40
E, M and C are real numbers. Enjoy your kike knowledge, towelhead.
Name:
Anonymous2013-02-10 0:42
>>169
Dunno what are "reals". I guess reals are some kind of rationals, but invisible and pink.
Name:
Anonymous2013-02-10 0:46
>>170
Real numbers are equivalence classes of Cauchy sequences of rational numbers.
Rational numbers are constructed from the integers.
Integers are constructed using formal logic.
Formal logic can be used to disprove your idiotic kike bullshit.
Therefore you should oppose real numbers.
Name:
Anonymous2013-02-10 0:49
>>171
I've studied a book by two Jewish authors and it stated that reals are these "points at infinity".
Real numbers are equivalence classes of Cauchy sequences of rational numbers.
No they are not only. There is only one set unique up to isomorphism satisfying each of the following properties:
A. It is a totally ordered field.
B. Addition and multiplication are defined. Each element except zero has a multiplicative inverse. Etc.. Addition and multiplication tie into the ordering...
B.1. if x > y then x + z > y + z
B.2. if x > 0, y > 0, then xy > 0
C. Every non empty subset that is bounded admits a least upper bound.
The rationals pass A and B, but fail C. The integers pass A and C, but only 1 and -1 have multiplicative inverses, so they fail B.
But it takes at least one construction to validate their existence.
Rational numbers are constructed from the integers.
Yes, as equivalence classes of Z*Z.
Integers are constructed using formal logic.
Hah!
Formal logic can be used to disprove your idiotic kike bullshit.
Hah! Seriously, while I've found the bullshit to be idiotic since Nikita started spamming /prog/, I stopped arguing with him once I realized it was impossible to prove that a conspiracy didn't exist, regardless of any connotations for the said conspiracy.
Therefore you should oppose real numbers.
no
Name:
Anonymous2013-02-10 3:33
TIL what numbers are
Name:
Anonymous2013-02-10 3:36
>>173 No they are not only. There is only one set unique up to isomorphism satisfying each of the following properties:
whoa, I'd like to see a proof of that!
Set X satisfies each property and set Y satisfies each property. Define an isomorphism between the two.
You can start by mapping the zero element to each other. The real numbers can correspond to themselves in a lot of ways, so there is probably a lot of freedom in doing it.
Name:
Anonymous2013-02-10 3:58
>>176 It's probably not too hard.
Ah but simple questions sometimes aren't. Try this one out:
The only non-trivial ring endomorphism over the real numbers is the identity.
Both X and Y have their zero and one elements.
Add the one element to itself over and over to form the naturals in X and the naturals in Y.
Include the additive inverse of each natural to get the integers for both sets.
Use the multiplicative inverse of each integer and closure under multiplication to get all the rationals for X and Y.
Use the Cauchy sequence construction within X and Y to get limit points for all the other reals.
Or maybe once you have a correspondence for the rationals in X and Y, that is enough to pin point the reals between them.
something like that...
Name:
Anonymous2013-02-10 4:01
>>178
LLLLLEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEELLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL
>EGIN LE SAGE!
>LE FAGGOT
>EGINGOINGWINZIMSIN GRO!!!!! XDDDDD
Absolutely terrible. This simply cannot stand. A spam bot that replies based upon the value of the sage field. Maybe we do need a new /prog/. Are we really getting popular enough to need moderation?
Part 3 assumed that f(1) = 1, and ignored the possibility of f(1) = 0. A mistake! A mistake! Terrible! Terrible! Ignore it in the case that f(1) = 0 ! Ignore it! Ignore it!
Part 6: for all rationals r, we either have that ∀r f(r) = 0 or we have that ∀r f(r) = r.
Suppose we are in the case that f(1) = 0. Then it was shown that for all integers n, f(n) = 0. So for a rational, r = p/q, we have that:
>>217
I'm trying to show that f is the identify function in one case, but my only assumptions are given in >>192 as P1 and P2.
Sorry >>190-san. While your bot was most disruptive, it was also creative in its own right.
Name:
Anonymous2013-02-11 7:36
Try proving it isn't the identity function, i.e. assume f(n) ≠ n, then continue the proof by induction as you were.
No idea how it would go, but it's worth a try?
Name:
Anonymous2013-02-11 7:50
I'm just wondering: have you guys ever craved cock so badly that you found yourself running around outside, howling at the moon for it? Literally ROARING at the top of your lungs, wanting nothing less than a dick's head churning against your glottal stop?
Tell me I'm not alone.
Name:
Anonymous2013-02-11 22:48
>>219
dont remember euclid needing your identity function...
Name:
Anonymous2013-02-12 0:38
>>221
don't remember patrick bateman checking my TRIPS
1. If f(1) = 0, then f is the zero function.
2. If f(1) is not 0, then f is the identity function on the rationals.
If f has to be continuous, then (2) implies that f is the identity on the reals as well, but without continuity I can't connect the rationals to non-rationals so easily.
Part 7: if f(1) is not zero, then f is id on all real nth roots of all rationals.
Let n be a power and r a non-negative rational.
Let b be the unique real nth root of r, b = root(r,n)
Since f(b) multiplied by itself n times is equal to r, we have that f(b) is an nth root of r. Because real roots are unique, this implies that f(b) = b. XD
Name:
Anonymous2013-02-18 12:34
>>225 this implies that f(b) = b. XD
That's not even funny, fagshit.
Name:
Anonymous2013-02-18 13:18
dont remember euclid needing your identity function.
Name:
Anonymous2013-02-18 15:55
wut?
Name:
Anonymous2013-02-18 16:04
NEETkita Le Hikikomori
Name:
Anonymous2013-02-19 2:00
Well, it can be shown by induction of each of the parts that any number that can be formed by a finite number of additions, subtractions, multiplications, divisions, and square roots, applying the said operations in any order, then f fixes this number. So that covers quite a few numbers, but I really doubt that every real number can be expressed in this way. I could prove that by showing the set of all finite length algebraic expressions using sums, differences, multiplications, quotients, and roots, to be countable. I guess that is obvious, since the set of such algebraic expressions would correspond to a subset of the language of all strings containing '( ) + * - / ^ 1' which is a countable set.
So no, I don't have the reals yet. I think continuity is needed. I'll try to produce a counter example.
Name:
Anonymous2013-02-19 2:09
>>230
Prove that "induction" is a provable way prove anything.
>>231
Give me an expression using n applications of the said operations, and I'll write you a proof that uses n lines, using the parts already shown at each step.