/prog/ - javascript

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-27 16:21

I fucking hate javascript.

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-27 16:22

ur a fgt

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-27 16:32

i dont fucking hate it, but i want to like it and cant. nodejs seems so fucking awesome, but i cant understand why you would use server side tools with a language designed to be embedded in the browser. like wtf man

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-27 16:44

Back to /jp/ you fucking homonerd. I hate you too.

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-27 16:45

>>4,5
back to /g/ please

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-27 16:52

JavaScript? More like JavaSHIT!

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-27 17:59

>>3
e/g/in

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-27 18:01

>>7
back to /g/ please

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-27 18:02

nodejs seems so fucking awesome
0/10

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-27 18:07

LLLLLLLLLLLEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEELLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL
>EGIN

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-27 18:10

>>1
your loss.

it's the most advanced dynamic language in existence. i hope you hate programming too, because within a few years js will be the only language allowed to execute on modern operating systems

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-27 18:27

>>11
most advanced????
proof required

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-27 18:43

>>12
In a sense that it lets you get away with practically any kind of crap.

``It just werkz!''
　　　　　－Rasmus Ledorfstein, inventor of Hypertext Preprocessing.

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-27 19:17

>>12
closures, callbacks, prototypes, ===

also, upcoming innovations for es6: generators, weak maps, metaprogramming via proxies, maps that allow anything as a key

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-27 19:26

>>14
I hate the be that person again, but every single thing you listed has been in lua since forever.

===
are you trolling?

Name: >>15 2012-12-27 19:28

>>14
Unless by anything being a key in a map you mean maps with deep equality on the keys. But if you are talking about implicit stringification of keys as a feature then...

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-27 19:52

I was googleing about and found some unrelated blog post by a weeaboo indian currynigger faggot about , lol wtf is the deal with that. I would post it here but I want to spare him the embarrassment,

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-27 20:01

>>15
lua is a shitty toy language with no future

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-27 20:35

gieb web bytecode pl0x

pls w3c
pls

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-27 20:46

>>15
if lua ran in browsers, everyone would hate lua instead

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-27 20:48

>>20
unfortunately, it's the good language that gets the bad rep

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-27 21:59

>>18
lua has become the standard embedded scripting language.

>>20
it is still used appropriately in other applications. But yes, any non-byte code browser language will be hated.

>>21
javascript is shit.

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-27 22:06

steve gayye loves js, he thinks smart people like js and he wants to be like them.
javascript is a language for homosexuals, much like ruby or python.

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-27 22:44

Use NoScript to filter out harmful and ultimately unscientific JavaShit.

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-28 4:15

I don't understand why people like JavaScript's loose prolapsed type system

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-28 6:30

>>20
Say the inventors of luakit. However Scheme was going to be the standard, until a freshmen placed spaghetti code all over netscape. ``Thus the Javashit was born, using the ultra super foulness, Closure, Protos, and ObjectStruck, and Dedicated their uptime to fight Startups and the forces of Eval()//

+10 points if you know the cameo mix

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-31 12:31

bump! :))))

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-31 12:46

I'm pretty sure IBM intended XHTML to replace HTML, with tags mapping to classes defined in bytecode. Same thing with .Net, yet they all chickened out. I don't understand why, it would be stupid easy for the engineers in either company to replace the html-stack with something beautiful, it would be pretty easy for any CS student too actually.

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-31 12:49

Like replacing HTML and any other ML bullshite with S-expressions.

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-31 13:45

>>28
Oh wow. Yeah, I'd really love for IBM, ground zero of enterprise bullshit, to design a replacement for HTML. I'm sure it would not be some pig disgusting Java trash. Yes sir.

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-31 14:27

>>29
S-expressions are disgusting. That's why SexpCode will never replace BBCode or Markdown.

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-31 14:32

>>31
Blasphemy! Heathen!

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-31 14:39

if you don't think javascript is retarded, watch this:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kXEgk1Hdze0

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-31 14:46

>>33
shitting on Ruby
2013
I shi/g/g/y si/g/g/y

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-31 14:54

>>34
fuck off

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-31 16:33

>>34
LE E/G/IN LLLLLLLLLLLLLLEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEELLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-31 16:35

>>36
see >>35

>>37
LEL E/G/IN XDDD

>>38
see >>35,37

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-31 16:57

>e/g/in win memegro

Name: Anonymous 2013-01-01 1:21

LOOSELY PROLAPSE MY ANUS

Name: Anonymous 2013-01-09 17:12

I hate it so fucking much.

Name: Anonymous 2013-01-09 17:24

If it looks like a duck, swims like a duck, and quacks like a duck, then call it a fucking duck.

Name: Anonymous 2013-01-09 17:56

why do you hate the future?
why do you hate our freedoms?

i hope you like js, because it's the only language you will be allowed to execute on your computer in a couple of years.

Name: Anonymous 2013-01-09 18:30

>>42
i hope you like my cock, because it's the only thing you will be allowed to suck in a couple of years.

Name: Anonymous 2013-01-18 17:14

I hate javascript so fucking much.

Name: Anonymous 2013-01-18 17:43

>>41
With JS, however: if it looks like a duck, and it really is a duck, it might actually be a chicken according to typeof. Nonetheless, it's possible to breed a dog with a teapot and get a toaster, and you won't even get a TypeError! Well, assuming it can figure out which of those three this is supposed to reference, that is.

Name: Anonymous 2013-01-18 17:43

isnt javascript that really old web 1.0 language that made message boxes popup in internet explorer 4.0 and made little rainbow particles shoot out of your mouse cursor and scroll comic sans ms text across the page? do people still use that?

Name: Anonymous 2013-01-18 17:47

>>46
Yes, and yes.

Name: Anonymous 2013-01-18 19:18

>>45
OO this idiot's way: using inheritance at all

Name: Anonymous 2013-01-18 20:19

>>48
Nope, just what was already provided by Javascript!

Not surprising, they rush to implement features from other languages to make that shitpile look more attractive, then manage to fuck up the implementation in one way or another. Then all these web faggots eat it for breakfast and flood programming sites/blogs/whatever with how awesome Javascript is and why node and WebGL is the future.

I hear they're adding classes to ES6. Can't wait to see how they fuck those up!

javascript

1 Name: Anonymous 2012-12-27 16:21

2 Name: Anonymous 2012-12-27 16:22

3 Name: Anonymous 2012-12-27 16:32

4 Name: Anonymous 2012-12-27 16:44

5 Name: Anonymous 2012-12-27 16:45

6 Name: Anonymous 2012-12-27 16:52

7 Name: Anonymous 2012-12-27 17:59

8 Name: Anonymous 2012-12-27 18:01

9 Name: Anonymous 2012-12-27 18:02

10 Name: Anonymous 2012-12-27 18:07

11 Name: Anonymous 2012-12-27 18:10

12 Name: Anonymous 2012-12-27 18:27

13 Name: Anonymous 2012-12-27 18:43

14 Name: Anonymous 2012-12-27 19:17

15 Name: Anonymous 2012-12-27 19:26

16 Name: >>15 2012-12-27 19:28

17 Name: Anonymous 2012-12-27 19:52

18 Name: Anonymous 2012-12-27 20:01

19 Name: Anonymous 2012-12-27 20:35

20 Name: Anonymous 2012-12-27 20:46

21 Name: Anonymous 2012-12-27 20:48

22 Name: Anonymous 2012-12-27 21:59

23 Name: Anonymous 2012-12-27 22:06

24 Name: Anonymous 2012-12-27 22:44

25 Name: Anonymous 2012-12-28 4:15

26 Name: Anonymous 2012-12-28 6:30

27 Name: Anonymous 2012-12-31 12:31

28 Name: Anonymous 2012-12-31 12:46

29 Name: Anonymous 2012-12-31 12:49

30 Name: Anonymous 2012-12-31 13:45

31 Name: Anonymous 2012-12-31 14:27

32 Name: Anonymous 2012-12-31 14:32

33 Name: Anonymous 2012-12-31 14:39

34 Name: Anonymous 2012-12-31 14:46

35 Name: Anonymous 2012-12-31 14:54

36 Name: Anonymous 2012-12-31 16:33

37 Name: Anonymous 2012-12-31 16:35

38 Name: Anonymous 2012-12-31 16:57

39 Name: Anonymous 2013-01-01 1:21

40 Name: Anonymous 2013-01-09 17:12

41 Name: Anonymous 2013-01-09 17:24

42 Name: Anonymous 2013-01-09 17:56

43 Name: Anonymous 2013-01-09 18:30

44 Name: Anonymous 2013-01-18 17:14

45 Name: Anonymous 2013-01-18 17:43

46 Name: Anonymous 2013-01-18 17:43

47 Name: Anonymous 2013-01-18 17:47

48 Name: Anonymous 2013-01-18 19:18

49 Name: Anonymous 2013-01-18 20:19

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-27 16:21

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-27 16:22

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-27 16:32

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-27 16:44

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-27 16:45

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-27 16:52

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-27 17:59

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-27 18:01

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-27 18:02

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-27 18:07

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-27 18:10

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-27 18:27

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-27 18:43

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-27 19:17

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-27 19:26

Name: >>15 2012-12-27 19:28

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-27 19:52

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-27 20:01

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-27 20:35

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-27 20:46

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-27 20:48

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-27 21:59

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-27 22:06

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-27 22:44

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-28 4:15

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-28 6:30

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-31 12:31

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-31 12:46

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-31 12:49

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-31 13:45

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-31 14:27

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-31 14:32

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-31 14:39

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-31 14:46

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-31 14:54

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-31 16:33

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-31 16:35

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-31 16:57

Name: Anonymous 2013-01-01 1:21

Name: Anonymous 2013-01-09 17:12

Name: Anonymous 2013-01-09 17:24

Name: Anonymous 2013-01-09 17:56

Name: Anonymous 2013-01-09 18:30

Name: Anonymous 2013-01-18 17:14

Name: Anonymous 2013-01-18 17:43

Name: Anonymous 2013-01-18 17:43

Name: Anonymous 2013-01-18 17:47

Name: Anonymous 2013-01-18 19:18

Name: Anonymous 2013-01-18 20:19