/prog/ - javascript

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-27 16:21

I fucking hate javascript.

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-27 16:22

ur a fgt

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-27 16:32

i dont fucking hate it, but i want to like it and cant. nodejs seems so fucking awesome, but i cant understand why you would use server side tools with a language designed to be embedded in the browser. like wtf man

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-27 16:44

Back to /jp/ you fucking homonerd. I hate you too.

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-27 16:45

>>4,5
back to /g/ please

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-27 16:52

JavaScript? More like JavaSHIT!

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-27 17:59

>>3
e/g/in

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-27 18:01

>>7
back to /g/ please

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-27 18:02

nodejs seems so fucking awesome
0/10

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-27 18:07

LLLLLLLLLLLEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEELLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL
>EGIN

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-27 18:10

>>1
your loss.

it's the most advanced dynamic language in existence. i hope you hate programming too, because within a few years js will be the only language allowed to execute on modern operating systems

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-27 18:27

>>11
most advanced????
proof required

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-27 18:43

>>12
In a sense that it lets you get away with practically any kind of crap.

``It just werkz!''
　　　　　－Rasmus Ledorfstein, inventor of Hypertext Preprocessing.

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-27 19:17

>>12
closures, callbacks, prototypes, ===

also, upcoming innovations for es6: generators, weak maps, metaprogramming via proxies, maps that allow anything as a key

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-27 19:26

>>14
I hate the be that person again, but every single thing you listed has been in lua since forever.

===
are you trolling?

Name: >>15 2012-12-27 19:28

>>14
Unless by anything being a key in a map you mean maps with deep equality on the keys. But if you are talking about implicit stringification of keys as a feature then...

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-27 19:52

I was googleing about and found some unrelated blog post by a weeaboo indian currynigger faggot about , lol wtf is the deal with that. I would post it here but I want to spare him the embarrassment,

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-27 20:01

>>15
lua is a shitty toy language with no future

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-27 20:35

gieb web bytecode pl0x

pls w3c
pls

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-27 20:46

>>15
if lua ran in browsers, everyone would hate lua instead

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-27 20:48

>>20
unfortunately, it's the good language that gets the bad rep

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-27 21:59

>>18
lua has become the standard embedded scripting language.

>>20
it is still used appropriately in other applications. But yes, any non-byte code browser language will be hated.

>>21
javascript is shit.

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-27 22:06

steve gayye loves js, he thinks smart people like js and he wants to be like them.
javascript is a language for homosexuals, much like ruby or python.

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-27 22:44

Use NoScript to filter out harmful and ultimately unscientific JavaShit.

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-28 4:15

I don't understand why people like JavaScript's loose prolapsed type system

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-28 6:30

>>20
Say the inventors of luakit. However Scheme was going to be the standard, until a freshmen placed spaghetti code all over netscape. ``Thus the Javashit was born, using the ultra super foulness, Closure, Protos, and ObjectStruck, and Dedicated their uptime to fight Startups and the forces of Eval()//

+10 points if you know the cameo mix

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-31 12:31

bump! :))))

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-31 12:46

I'm pretty sure IBM intended XHTML to replace HTML, with tags mapping to classes defined in bytecode. Same thing with .Net, yet they all chickened out. I don't understand why, it would be stupid easy for the engineers in either company to replace the html-stack with something beautiful, it would be pretty easy for any CS student too actually.

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-31 12:49

Like replacing HTML and any other ML bullshite with S-expressions.

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-31 13:45

>>28
Oh wow. Yeah, I'd really love for IBM, ground zero of enterprise bullshit, to design a replacement for HTML. I'm sure it would not be some pig disgusting Java trash. Yes sir.

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-31 14:27

>>29
S-expressions are disgusting. That's why SexpCode will never replace BBCode or Markdown.

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-31 14:32

>>31
Blasphemy! Heathen!

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-31 14:39

if you don't think javascript is retarded, watch this:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kXEgk1Hdze0

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-31 14:46

>>33
shitting on Ruby
2013
I shi/g/g/y si/g/g/y

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-31 14:54

>>34
fuck off

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-31 16:33

>>34
LE E/G/IN LLLLLLLLLLLLLLEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEELLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-31 16:35

>>36
see >>35

>>37
LEL E/G/IN XDDD

>>38
see >>35,37

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-31 16:57

>e/g/in win memegro

Name: Anonymous 2013-01-01 1:21

LOOSELY PROLAPSE MY ANUS

Name: Anonymous 2013-01-09 17:12

I hate it so fucking much.

javascript

1 Name: Anonymous 2012-12-27 16:21

2 Name: Anonymous 2012-12-27 16:22

3 Name: Anonymous 2012-12-27 16:32

4 Name: Anonymous 2012-12-27 16:44

5 Name: Anonymous 2012-12-27 16:45

6 Name: Anonymous 2012-12-27 16:52

7 Name: Anonymous 2012-12-27 17:59

8 Name: Anonymous 2012-12-27 18:01

9 Name: Anonymous 2012-12-27 18:02

10 Name: Anonymous 2012-12-27 18:07

11 Name: Anonymous 2012-12-27 18:10

12 Name: Anonymous 2012-12-27 18:27

13 Name: Anonymous 2012-12-27 18:43

14 Name: Anonymous 2012-12-27 19:17

15 Name: Anonymous 2012-12-27 19:26

16 Name: >>15 2012-12-27 19:28

17 Name: Anonymous 2012-12-27 19:52

18 Name: Anonymous 2012-12-27 20:01

19 Name: Anonymous 2012-12-27 20:35

20 Name: Anonymous 2012-12-27 20:46

21 Name: Anonymous 2012-12-27 20:48

22 Name: Anonymous 2012-12-27 21:59

23 Name: Anonymous 2012-12-27 22:06

24 Name: Anonymous 2012-12-27 22:44

25 Name: Anonymous 2012-12-28 4:15

26 Name: Anonymous 2012-12-28 6:30

27 Name: Anonymous 2012-12-31 12:31

28 Name: Anonymous 2012-12-31 12:46

29 Name: Anonymous 2012-12-31 12:49

30 Name: Anonymous 2012-12-31 13:45

31 Name: Anonymous 2012-12-31 14:27

32 Name: Anonymous 2012-12-31 14:32

33 Name: Anonymous 2012-12-31 14:39

34 Name: Anonymous 2012-12-31 14:46

35 Name: Anonymous 2012-12-31 14:54

36 Name: Anonymous 2012-12-31 16:33

37 Name: Anonymous 2012-12-31 16:35

38 Name: Anonymous 2012-12-31 16:57

39 Name: Anonymous 2013-01-01 1:21

40 Name: Anonymous 2013-01-09 17:12