So I have this faggot at work, who is a total ass. He writes shit code and makes comments on the level of ``i++; //adds one to i'', and I can't even tell if he's being sarcastic or not. Should I like, set him on fire, or something?
Help put him in a position where his idiocy will be visible to others. Your problem will go away shortly. If not, find work elsewhere.
Name:
Anonymous2012-12-24 21:51
hax his anus
Name:
Anonymous2012-12-24 22:14
suck his dick
Name:
Anonymous2012-12-25 0:14
Ask to be reassigned? Kill him? Steal his car? Break his work computer(s)? Absolutely refuse to do business with any code written by him? Tell your boss-creature that he completely sucks at his job? Get a job somewhere that doesn't accept complete fucktards outside of the standing-outside-in-a-fursuit department?
>>8 nation of snitches I have this faggot at work, who is a total ass He writes shit code Should I ... set him on fire
Such is the art of eloquent orator. Praytell, how do I master this art as you have?
>>21
If that's the case, plant some printed out CP (from his printer, idiot, those things print invisible serial numbers) and put it under his bed. Then fuck up the data so he can't unencrypt it, then report that you saw him looking at it (anonymously). Even if the charges don't stick, he is ruined, and if they raid his home (likely), then they will find the pictures and he is ruined.
Name:
Anonymous2012-12-26 3:27
>>24 Then fuck up the data so he can't unencrypt it
just backup the first few megabytes of the partition elsewhere.
also now I hate your guts.
Name:
Anonymous2012-12-26 3:53
/*********************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************
**************** ADD ONE TO i: TURBO C STYLE***********************************************************************************************************/
i=i+1;
Name:
Anonymous2012-12-26 12:29
>>25
As if the police are going to let you alter anything. They'll come in with with no-knock warrant at 3AM and seize everything at once. Even if that's a problem, its simple to knock a hole in the wall and drop a flash disk with a true crypt container with a simple password in.
Remember, possession of CP is a strict liability crime, much like having a kilo of coke; how it got there is irrelevant, the fact that it was there at all in the crime. It's also easy work for the DA.
also now I hate your guts.
Its not as if I have or ever would do this even to my worst enemy. I'm just saying that it can be done. Blame the laws that make it easy, not me.
Name:
Anonymous2012-12-26 12:48
>>27 As if the police are going to let you alter anything.
You misunderstood (my fault, I wasn't specific enough), the idea is to back up (off-site) the first few megabytes of the encrypted volume such that even if the attacker destroys the cryptographic volume header and the filesystem superblock (rendering all the data unreadable), you can still give the police that back-up of the header so that they can recover the non-destroyed data on the hard-disk. Doesn't prove much, but at least it says "there's no sick fuck shit on my computer, so how about you consider that I might have been framed", similar to how not finding any drugs in someone blood could cast a shadow of doubt in a drug possession case. The no-knock warrant actually works in your favour, since it proves there's no way you could have altered the data beforehand.
Even if that's a problem, its simple to knock a hole in the wall and drop a flash disk with a true crypt container with a simple password in.
That does sound a lot easier. It would be possible to get DNA/fingerprint evidence on the flash drive, but the brutes with badges would probably destroy that evidence with their gloveless hands.
Remember, possession of CP is a strict liability crime, much like having a kilo of coke; how it got there is irrelevant, the fact that it was there at all in the crime. It's also easy work for the DA.
Unbelievable! The potential for abuse of such a law is so wide, one would have to be (metaphorically) blind not to see it.
Its not as if I have or ever would do this even to my worst enemy.
I agree, such an action would be incredibly fiendish.
Name:
Anonymous2012-12-26 12:49
Here's my idea, stop being an autistic faggot and do your own fucking work while not being bothered by someone elses work. How's that for an idea you stupid ass hat.
>>30
No, That sounds like a master C and Haskell programmer.
Regardless, you all jailbait planters are all autistic egotists that can't grow a pair. You all should be doing >>2 and >>7. >>8 changed the topic completely and used the incorrect class. EU coders would do this, and in private as not to embarrass. You all have no decency, and your code most be shit.
Actually now thinking, it looks like all you jailbait planters are PHP coders. At the least >>30 is.
>>33
The answer to your ``meme quotes'' is always ``Back to /g/, please''.
Name:
Anonymous2012-12-26 21:17
>>33
LLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLlEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEELLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLl
EGIN GRO
i++; // this line of code adds one to the variable named ``i'', using the post increment operator, which will evaluate to the pre-increment value of i. This is followed by a line terminator, and a comment explaining the code in detail
>>1
I had such a faggot colleague but then he left to assbook. I've heard he is mildly successful there. True story. >>54
about shitty compilers, i presume.