>>18
From the first two turns you already have 9*8 legal configurations. The next turn is *(7/2) because of two different ways of getting there. We're already at 252 legal configurations.
>>25
You presumably don't know PHP. Yet you're "disgusted by it," leading me to believe that you're just parroting what someone else said. Back to /g/, retard.
tfw you know c, c++, java, python and scheme but don't know html and css properly
Name:
Anonymous2012-11-21 22:36
tfw when my friend thinks quicklisp is good, and doesn't think racket is good. racket has centralized package distribution that never fucks up and is just as powerful as CL in the right hands, albeit a tiny bit slower.
>tfw I program in Ruby and nobody at my University does, nor does over half of /g/
>tfw I can't get find people to start up projects with in this language, and almost half to default to my other main language, C++
Name:
Anonymous2012-11-22 7:19
the feely when you get mediocre turbo-c wielding indian's wife in the anus
>>87
You'll still be an idiot, true, but at least your idiocy wouldn't shove itself obnoxiously in my face at the top of the page every time you decide to unleash it.
Name:
Anonymous2012-11-24 9:50
>>89
I don't feel like being pleasant with you anyway. Is there another reason why I should sage my posts?
Besides, you will only be fully satisfied when I'm dead.
>>90
It's not just for me, imbecile.
You're clearly new around these parts, so I'll let you in on a little secret.
Sage isn't ``this thread is shitty, let's get rid of it.'' (Not that this thread isn't shitty.)
No, this board is too low-traffic for that to work. Sage is ``my post isn't worth showing everyone'' or ``my post is clearly off-topic.'' It is humble and polite.
So posting multiple shitty, useless posts in a shitty, useless thread without saging is incredibly rude and obnoxious, which gives me an incredibly good idea that you are a terrible person.
Don't bother claiming ignorant innocence either, because your stubborn refusal to abide by the customs of a place you have only just blithely wandered into is clear, cretin.
Name:
Anonymous2012-11-24 10:20
>>91
But I'm not that new. I don't come from the imageboards either, I discovered 4chan (call it what you want) with /prog/ (googling for some Lisp shit). All I know from reddit, /b/, /g/ etc is the things that are relayed here.
Sage is absolutely irrelevant, but if you like it, use it, enjoy it. Be proud of your way of life, I'm tolerant enough.
>>94 our
I've been saging for years. I saged my own topics, I was so polite that I avoided posting follow-ups at all.
I have bought and read 20 books that were recommended on /prog/. I'm thankful for this.
This is the only place on the web that I check on a daily basis, and you're telling me to fuck off elsewhere. Your ``customs'' are stupid blind japanophilia.
There's only 5-10 of us here, what do you want? Hide all posts without sage in the mail field and you will be guaranteed to read only the good half of /prog/.
>>96
Do you honestly think a thread with a /g/-like title is a good thread? Are you self-entitled enough to think all your posts are good?
Not the guy you're replying to, by the way.
Name:
Anonymous2012-11-24 11:28
>>97 Do you honestly think a thread with a /g/-like title is a good thread?
This is a shitty thread among shitty threads. You won't see me shitposting in good ones. And if I reply at all, I don't forget my sage.
Now consider this: good threads are 100% saged and they slowly sink out of the front page with continuous good posts. Unfortunately you're too fucking lazy to check replies on page 2.
Now do you honestly think that /prog/ is like I would have liked it to be? I have abandoned all hope. I just don't give a shit anymore.
Name:
Anonymous2012-11-24 11:30
>>98 good threads are 100% saged and they slowly sink out of the front page with continuous good posts. [citation needed]
>>100-102
Good job, guise. So, I guess your rider implementations parse subject.txt for all new saged posts. You don't have to deal with the frontpage shitposters at all.
Name:
Anonymous2012-11-24 12:39
If Haskell is so good, then why is ncurses written in C?
>>106
Statistically, they have smaller dicks. According to a study in which volunteers forcibly removed random people's pants and measured their dicks. Most studies of penis size are done by just asking people what size their dicks are, and black men always lie about their dicks.
Functional programming is hipster shit. What working pros need is a programming language which integrates an ACID compliant graph database ((no delete), with time stamps for transactions, i.e. a database that does not try to be the "monkey" which SQL does) right into it's core. We are expected to answer what happened and why it happened at anytime, so the reason to why we need it is given. SQL does not cut it, for one it's to highlevel, it has no idea about what search trees to create (it's on retard level compared to a human), and it is just as retarded, if not more, when it comes to threading and locks (better leave that to humans, AI didn't happen yet). That's basically the rant I'll give an anxious over the hill software developer bugging me about functional programming, well if I'm not blowing him off asking him why he's not doing it in C already?