Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon.

Pages: 1-4041-8081-

I hate marijuana users

Name: Anonymous 2012-01-08 4:12

I hate marijuana users.

I hate them with every fiber in my being. I hate them more than anything else in this world. I have more hate for them than anyone who has hate for something and I assume the rest of my Straight Edge brethren would sympathize with me.

Why do I hate them?

-They are breaking the law.
-They are using a substance that is more cancer-causing than tobacco and more harmful to the brain than alcohol.
-They make up bullshit lies about marijuana being a relatively safe substance and being useful for medicinal purposes despite the fact that there are tons of studies proving otherwise.
-They are influencing the mass media and our culture into condemning anyone who doesn't do drugs and glamorizing this poisonous deliriant of a drug.
-They verbally harass and condemn everyone who doesn't smoke weed.

I would also like to make clear that everyone who thinks weed should be legalized is a pot smoker. And I'm sure none of you Straight Edgers associate with anyone who smokes weed. Thanks for understanding where I'm coming from.

http://www.whitehousedrugpolicy.gov/drugfact/marijuana/index.html

Name: Anonymous 2012-01-08 5:02

Ahve you red you're "The Corner" today?

Name: Anonymous 2012-01-08 5:23

Smoke weed every day. It makes idiots less annoying.

Name: Anonymous 2012-01-08 5:27

I love them with every hemp fiber in my being.

Name: Anonymous 2012-01-08 11:15

>>1 I myself dont smoke weed but i have many friends who do (atleast 10). They have never verbally harassed me for not smoking weed. Also get your fucking facts right its the opposite way around. Marijuana does NOT cause cancer. No one has EVER died from Marijuana. I dont smoke pot and i think it should be legalized because it can be used for SO many other things. Including but not limited to: paper, clothing, bricks, and rope. Also this has nothing to do with programing, so go take your anti-marijuana, drug war supporting (witch has never worked f.y.i.) ass somewhere else. You disgust me... your probably a republican.

Name: Anonymous 2012-01-08 11:25

/人◕ ‿‿ ◕人\

Name: Anonymous 2012-01-08 12:16

1/10 made me reply

Name: Anonymous 2012-01-08 14:44

but marajuana isn't cancer causing, given the shit they use to make it stronger may be, but it in it's base self is not cancer causing, in fact it has been shown to inhibit cancer growth in some individuals.

far better for you than cigarettes

may cause an early onset of schizorphrenia, so beware... i can testify to this, fucking history of schizophrenia in my family... smoked a shit load of weed and went to go in my room when i saw my childhood self running out to go play with his friends... he even stopped to talk to me, shit was fucking weird and this didn't go away for about 2 days... given he did point out some errors when programming so the hallucination wasn't all bad

Name: Anonymous 2012-01-08 15:18

I used to not care so much when people spread cannabis propaganda like some of you in this thread, but after my brother Overdosed I realized I couldn't ignore you idiots anymore.

YOU ARE KILLING PEOPLE WITH YOUR LIES

Every time you smoke, a marijuana addict is breaking into a car for his fix. He's vomiting in a back alley in withdrawal. He's about to snap because he can't take the world as it is anymore. He's lost all control over his perception of the real world. When he makes his final judgement, to take that one extra hit, it's already too late.

That's how I lost my brother to marijuana.

Name: VIPPER 2012-01-08 15:48

LOL JEWS

Name: Anonymous 2012-01-08 20:30

>>1
They make up bullshit lies about marijuana being a relatively safe substance
There is no safe mind affecting drug - any of them will irrepairable break your brain.

Any drug abuser is a danger for society, as he participates in http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multi-level_marketing system to get himself money for drugs, in effect producing more drug addicts, who will kill and rob you and/or your relatives for a few hundred bucks.

That is why any addict should be put to prison and anyone who sells or "helps" obtaining drugs should be punished by death penalty.

Name: Anonymous 2012-01-08 21:07

Program everyday, it makes smoking weed less annoying.

Name: Anonymous 2012-01-08 22:51

>>1
fuck off and die you cock sucking faggot

Name: Anonymous 2012-01-08 23:21

Cant we just kill all substance abusers? They are lost for society anyway.

Name: Anonymous 2012-01-08 23:53

lol I live in a country where it's legal. I grow my own and I don't ``abuse'' it (you won't see me go to work or drive while high)

Name: Anonymous 2012-01-09 0:04

>>15
We should deport all abusers into your country. And all the gypsies.

Name: Anonymous 2012-01-09 0:18

>>16
Fuck no thanks, keep your fucking idiots; here it's legal only because we're not retarded and/or weak enough to abuse it.

Name: Anonymous 2012-01-09 0:26

^^ abusing mull

how? (not using maybe?) or smoking too early in life, but otherwise??

Name: Anonymous 2012-01-09 0:38

drive while high >> abusing your ability to drive ? or abusing your high?

making stupid decisions >> abusing your ability to make decisions? or just being stupid? ...Lets make it illegal ^^ stupid, against the law...

Name: Anonymous 2012-01-09 1:03

Rich people get jealous that someone they think less rich is smiling more than them?
>must resist urge to prosecute with lawyers...< *argh, it's against the law* "resist resist.." XD

if you made stupid illegal, most laws would fly out the window too ^^

war; illegal..

commonsense really..

dropping bombs (anywhere); ...well you didn't like the twin-towers event much anyway, did you?

...funny how dropping bombs is cool until it comes to getting bombed..

Name: Anonymous 2012-01-09 1:26

Perhaps i should be the first to pity you all...

Especially the rich, i fear they are perhaps the most damaged, but hopefully none beyond repair... as much as you all may act it, and are probably kept too busy to notice..

All so ambitious, and yet what is the ambition? And what exactly are you doing instead?

Name: Anonymous 2012-01-09 1:49

>>20

"Welcome to hiroshima, newyork's newest suburb.."

9-11? pah! one building?! we wreck cities ^^

btw would you even know if a small town 'mysteriously' disappeared? ;) ...recently? ;;)

muahahah =D it never happened, whatever that means..

Name: Anonymous 2012-01-09 13:47

>>8
>may cause an early onset of schizorphrenia
Studies suggest that the chance of getting schizophrenia is heightened by the use of Cannabis by young adults.

How old are you again?

Name: Anonymous 2012-01-09 13:51

>>14
Agreed. Lets kill all those fag smoking, alcohol using bastards!

Name: Anonymous 2012-01-09 13:59

I support Maryjane, but i still think that the schizophrenia thing might be true.

Anyway, I'm willing to take the risk; in any case, all my familiar spirits that surround me can help.

Name: Anonymous 2012-01-09 15:19

>>1-25
schizophrenia
Psychiatry is pseudoscience.

Name: Anonymous 2012-01-10 6:33

Name: Anonymous 2012-01-10 7:04

Name: Anonymous 2012-01-10 7:20

smoke weed erryday

                        .
                        M
                       dM
                       MMr
                      4MMML                  .
                      MMMMM.                xf
      .              "MMMMM               .MM-
       Mh..          +MMMMMM            .MMMM
       .MMM.         .MMMMML.          MMMMMh
        )MMMh.        MMMMMM         MMMMMMM
         3MMMMx.     'MMMMMMf      xnMMMMMM"
         '*MMMMM      MMMMMM.     nMMMMMMP"
           *MMMMMx    "MMMMM\    .MMMMMMM=
            *MMMMMh   "MMMMM"   JMMMMMMP
              MMMMMM   3MMMM.  dMMMMMM            .
               MMMMMM  "MMMM  .MMMMM(        .nnMP"
   =..          *MMMMx  MMM"  dMMMM"    .nnMMMMM*
     "MMn...     'MMMMr 'MM   MMM"   .nMMMMMMM*"
      "4MMMMnn..   *MMM  MM  MMP"  .dMMMMMMM""
        ^MMMMMMMMx.  *ML "M .M*  .MMMMMM**"
           *PMMMMMMhn. *x > M  .MMMM**""
              ""**MMMMhx/.h/ .=*"
                       .3P"%....
                     nP"     "*MMnx

Name: Anonymous 2012-01-10 7:21

better than the original ascii actually

Name: Anonymous 2012-01-10 9:30

>>26
Cool story bro.

Name: Anonymous 2012-01-10 10:23

I thought we were suppose to smoke weed every day because it makes programming less annoying?

Name: Anonymous 2012-01-10 11:21

>>31
fuck you faggot

Name: Anonymous 2012-01-11 4:26

>>32
more weed = more idiots = less programmers = more money

Name: Anonymous 2012-01-11 6:16

>>31
It kind of is, though. But good thing that it's studied in universities instead of completely left in the hands of cranks and woo-meisters.

Name: Anonymous 2012-01-11 6:50

>>35
good thing that it's studied in universities
This makes psychiatry even more dangerous. Today psychiatrists force schoolkids to take PROZAC and they whant you believe that autism is disease, which should be treated with drugs!

Name: Anonymous 2012-01-11 6:53

>>35
it's studied in universities
The fact that something is being "studied in universities" doesn't make it a science.

Some time ago they studied theology in universities, today we have http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jewish_studies and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Women_studies as major university disciplines.

Name: Anonymous 2012-01-11 7:00

>>37
What about Nigger studies?

Name: Anonymous 2012-01-11 7:05

Name: Anonymous 2012-01-11 7:06

>>25
Do read some of http://surelysomemistake.blogspot.com/2011/07/reefer-madness-evidence.html.


Take opiates everyday; it makes weed smokers and straightedge fags less annoying.

Name: Anonymous 2012-01-11 7:53

>>36
lol your dumb.

>>37
The fact that something is being "studied in universities" doesn't make it a science.
I agree, but I'd rather have it being studied in a university setting than from some crazy crank on the street with a makeshift lemonade-like stand and charging a lot more than 5¢ per session like Lucy from Charlie Brown.

Name: Anonymous 2012-04-13 10:22

Bump

Name: Anonymous 2012-04-13 10:54

I am not a marijuana user. It doesn't use Lisp so I'm pretty sure Emacs is more powerful.

Name: Anonymous 2012-04-13 13:24

Marijuana is for people who don't program enough

Name: Anonymous 2012-04-13 13:34

>>44
what a waste of dubz

Name: Anonymous 2012-04-13 21:59

Cannabis is bad for you because smoking cannabis without a filter and with tobacco is bad for you.

Also, we should imprison, take money off of, and/or steal cannabis from people who are in possession of cannabis for this reason because it is possible that somebody might buy cannabis from them, at their own free will, then smoke it without a filter and with tobacco (which would be bad for them.)

The key is to keep people oppressed. We wouldn't want anybody not showing up to work, would we? That would be bad. Imagine if Mr. Kodak the Camera didn't show up to work, who would be scrubbing all those toilets? That's right, nobody would be.

Name: Anonymous 2012-04-13 23:03

>>46
Don't flatter yourself. You would be. Just because you've been promoted to urinal cleaner, doesn't mean that you won't need to fill in if the toilet scrubber didn't show up.

Name: Anonymous 2012-04-14 0:38

>>47
I don't even work, silly rodent. LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOL

Name: anonymous 2012-07-01 10:01

Buy Marijuana Online now and have it delivered to your doorstep by marijuana delivery men. The Marijuana store provides secure and discreet Marijuana Services at incredibly low rates competitive to street rates in USA and Canada visit our website and our facebook page to read about us and see what we are doing!!
http://themarijuanastore.co.cc/
visit our Facebook page at: facebook.com/CouldBeMoreHigh

Name: Anonymous 2012-07-01 15:43

GAS ALL DRUG USERS

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-16 19:16

Jesus christ there are a lot of ignorant people on here..  smoke weed everyday and stop complaining.

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-16 19:19

Weed is a nigger drug anyway--makes you lazy. Methamphetamine for fun, opiates to relax.

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-16 20:22

pot is cool. i smoke pot everyday. and i'm not a lazy ass at all. i've been told many times that i am a workaholic.

maybe work is my drug, and pot is like my work

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-17 15:32

Indica makes me a lazy, retarded fuck.
But that's just me. Sativa is what got me into programming.
Sage for awful thread

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-18 2:07

>>1-54
stoned man stoned. stoned stoned stoned.

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-18 2:18

/newpol/

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-19 1:17

Silly potheads! Now, while I think it might be possible for SOME people to resist the Marijuana a bit, I don't think you are all unaffected. Watch any other drug user, they believe it's good, they fight for it to be good. It does stuff to them and they ignore it.

While pot is nowhere near the worst drug, it's still bad for you.

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-19 1:31

>>1
You should hate the Jews instead, because it were the Jews, who started this whole commie/hippie movement and it are the Jew who make profit on drug trafficking.

Still narcomania is a good weapon, as it impoverishes target auditory, increases criminality and lowers birth-rate, so introduce drug-addiction into some nigger ghetto and niggers will go down.

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-19 2:19

/newpol/

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-19 2:34

>>59
/auschwitz/

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-19 3:48

>>58
Dr. Timothy Leary, the idol of the hippie generation, tells their side of the story: "These Jewish flower children joined the hippy movement out of rejection of the sham and hypocrisy cf their parents' life!" It is a scorching indictment of our adult society.
Parents who endured the years of depression, he explains, are insecure. They are on a weird machine-trip and hunger for material things. The Jewish home, he continues, has lost its original vitality. Judaism's idealism has been dulled. Once the real Pass- over Seder turned the kids on! Jewish kids were moved by the ecstasy of Jewish ceremonies. Now the rituals are blah. A mock Seder. A robot ritual. Just cheap substitutes.
You and I belong to that machine age. We fear unemployment, we dread those breadlines and those eviction notices. And in our zeal to avoid a repetition of those nightmares, the pendulum was swung to the opposite extreme.
Security, we now think, depends only on one factor- d l u - ence. We assume falsely that happiness hinges on material belong- ings. Nothing else. And what a price we pay for this mistake!
The caustic criticism of Dr. Harold Weisberg, professor of Philosophy at Brandeis University, explains our predicament. "Jewish parents expect a strong ethical conscience from their children but neglect their own conscience!" The age of chivalry is now the age of chiselry.

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-19 4:02

>>61
/newpol/

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-19 4:05

>>62
Shalom!

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-19 12:17

Psychiatry isn't ``pseudoscience'', the real problem with psychiatry is that it's descriptive. Everything is based on ``social norms'' which is why homosexuality used to be a disorder, and why pedosexuality hopefully won't be within the coming decades.

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-19 12:39

>>64
Disgusting pedophile.

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-19 12:59

Name: Linux Otaku 2012-09-19 13:09

I have been onanising since thirteen years old, and I can say that I rediscovered bondage. At that time, I got really sexually aroused from bondaging myself with belts and then not being able to move when rolling on the floor. I did not know that it was named bondage and it was bdsm practice, I invented it by myself. So I can say I really rediscovered it.

It was only to the time around 15, when I watched a film Perfect Prey, which changed my life. It was about a man suffocating kidnapped womans with plastic bag, dressing them like a doll and then arranging their bodies. The day I was watching it I got sexualy aroused by seeing a young lady bondaged to a chair and suffocating with plastic bag over her had. I was onanising and imagining myself being that women. Then I started with experimental suffocating myself, I invented mechanisms with tape over my mouth so that I suffocate only little and when it is enough the tape breaks, I also bondaged myself with belts. I was still teenager when I was doing this to get sexually satisfied.

While sexually saysfying myself with this stuff, another thing sneaked on me – being so many times an innocend, hopeless women in my mind, I started to want to be a girl. Just because I imagined that girls are naturally submissive, they are naturaly opressed, and they role is to be a slave to their master. So sometimes I secretly crossdressed while doing the old good thing to get even more of the high.

Then I found there is a lot of anime and manga dealing with crossdressing and girls, and started to download it and collect it, to enhance my imagination. I have discovered another ways of bdsm, like imagining having a strict aunt forcing me to be a little obedient girl who gets spanked, suffocated and raped…

It is not that I get aroused reading manga where under 18 years old get raped because I would be imagining be the rapist. I’m imaging that ME is the character being raped, I even experimented with putting fingers into my ass to stimulate prostate gland.

In any way, one of my favourite, probably not so illegal but might be in some countries is Boy Soprano, it is about a boy being bringed up as a girls while being sexually teased/abused by his step sister and auntie… You can find it with google by typing in boy soprano to images section, one of the links google found is for example: hXXp://theawesomehentai.com/manga/Boy%20Soprano/Volume%2001/, just to get the idea.

So while I’m really perverted young male right now (and still virgin…), and I might like cartoons and stories which could be considered CP, I’m not actually some “dirty pedobear”, but rather a slutty bitch, and I’m planning to buy continue with that, I have already choosen a shop to order custom size japanese schoolgirl uniform and I will get french maid one too with that, just to have more fun ;)

Linux Otaku

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-19 13:33

>>64
Children cannot give consent you moron.  What's next, rapesexuality as an orientation?

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-19 14:11

Drugs are everywhere.
Our brain is regulated by hormones which are stimulated by various substances, drugs included.
Rather than banning them all, using them for true freedom (choosing to use a drug not to be influenced by my own brain) is truly superior.

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-19 14:13

>>69
There is no safe mind affecting drug - any of them will irrepairable break your brain.

Any drug abuser is a danger for society, as he participates in http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multi-level_marketing system to get himself money for drugs, in effect producing more drug addicts, who will kill and rob you and/or your relatives for a few hundred bucks.

That is why any addict should be put to prison and anyone who sells or "helps" obtaining drugs should be punished by death penalty.

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-19 14:16

>>70
A dog the moment it tastes human blood will treat humans as a pray. A drug addict once tasted heroin will subdue his whole existence to addiction.

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-19 14:27

>>68
First off, paedophilia is a paraphilia. It's sort of like a fetish, except fetishes traditionally refer to objects, and plenty of paedophiles are also/more interested in the romantic aspect of relationships just like anyone else. Being a paedophile does not necessarily mean you have sex with children, you have had sex with children, you have molested children, or even that you want to have sex with children (in the same way that some homosexuals would refuse gay sex).

Right now, paedophiles have a DSM-recognised mental disorder. They should be getting help, but they cannot because society has shunned them. Headlines rarely say, ``Child molester caught by police,'' they say things like, ``Paedophile caught by police,'' even if they're not a tabloid (tabloids like to go with things such as, ``Sick, twisted paedo put to justice''). Everyone treats paedophiles--not child molesters--like scum, because they're supposedly inherently bad people even if it's something they cannot control.

Now, I personally believe the production of more explicit child pornography should be illegal, or at least it should go through a very thorough process to be made. Most ``child pornography'' out there is just lewd child modelling, mostly from an era or country where it was legal. The kids are smiling, the parents were paid, consent was given. It rarely destroys their lives any more than adult pornography destroys adults'. Distribution should definitely be legal, especially for content that already exists. Despite what people (seriously) seem to believe, there's no psychic field that makes kids relive their abuse every time some horny middle-aged man gets his jollies off to their pictures.

So, legal child pornography would give paedophiles an outlet. Heterosexual pornography doesn't make men into rapists, and I doubt child pornography would significantly increase the number of child molesters. In fact, I think it might reduce the number, since now they have something to get sexual gratification from without fear of being caught. Banning lolicon (as the US and most of the EU do) is also stupid, and a Dutch study found cartoon paedophilia to be harmless.

Right, now back to your point, so this doesn't look like a big, off-topic rant or straw man. Children legally cannot give consent. To be frank, children are stupid and don't understand anything. If we let kids do whatever they wanted, they would probably all die in traffic accidents after losing all their teeth from eating sugar for every meal. This is why we have parents and caregivers, who make responsible decisions on behalf of their children. Maybe there is no way a child can be psychologically ready for sex, and I think it is something that needs empirical research without any political drama or fear of censorship. Perhaps we could legalise adult-child sex but require the child to undergo a proper sex education, and for the adult to seek the parents' approval.

None of this matters though. For as liberal as we're all becoming, the persecution of paedophiles will only get worse. People have even started to call hebephiles and ephebophiles "paedophiles", which is ridiculous because the latter is perfectly normal. I think paedophilia, child pornography and child molestation are second only to the Holocaust in the list of things you are simply not allowed to talk about without agreeing with everyone else's accepted view. Even if you do, your reputation is destroyed forever. God bless you, ``freedom of speech''!

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-19 14:29

>>72
Pedophilia is Jewish.

Richard Goldberg (American Jew, flooded Internet with child porn), Jerry Sandusky (American Jew, found guilty on 45 of the 48 counts of sex crimes against young boys), William Hickman (American Jew, butchered 12-year-old christian girl), Leo Frank (American Jew, raped and murdered 13-year-old Mary Phagan), Andrew Mogilyansky (Russian-American Jew, organized a child prostitution ring), Michael Verbitsky (Russian-American Jew, defends the rights of Jewish pedophiles), Sergey Kuznetsov (Russian Jew, organized a child prostitution ring), Roman Polanski (Franco-Polish Jew, raped 13-year-old girl), Anthony Weiner (American Jew, turned Ohel Children’s Home and Family Service into a sex ring), Abraham Mondrowitz (American-Israeli Jew, abused dozens of children at his private Brooklyn clinic)

In 2000, a Jewish “Russian” organized crime ring was uncovered that specialized in kidnapping Russian children, some as young as two years old, from parks and orphanages and then subjecting them to rape, torture and murder, all on video tape. These tapes were sold to thousands of Jewish and Gentile perverts all over the world. When police in Italy were frustrated by lack of action by the authorities they released some of the video footage to an Italian network which then showed some of the graphic images hoping to cause public outrage. In spite of the horror and obvious newsworthiness of this international Jewish child porn/murder operation, it received little coverage in the media in the United States. When Seth Bekenstein, the ring’s American distributor was arrested, there was little publicity, and in spite of being a part of one of the most horrific criminal activities imaginable, he was sentenced to only 18 months on guilty plea.

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-19 14:31

>>73
/newpol/

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-19 14:50

>>74
JIDF

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-19 15:00

>>74
I think there is a resurgence of anti-Semitism because at this point in time Europe has not yet learned how to be multicultural. And I think we are going to be part of the throes of that transformation, which must take place. Europe is not going to be the monolithic societies they once were in the last century. Jews are going to be at the centre of that. It's a huge transformation for Europe to make. They are now going into a multicultural mode and Jews will be resented because of our leading role. -- Barbara Lerner Spectre

The strengthening of multicultural or diverse Australia is also our most effective insurance policy against anti-Semitism. The day Australia has a Chinese Australian Governor General I would feel more confident of my freedom to live as a Jewish Australian. -- Miriam Faine

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-19 15:01

>>76
/newpol/

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-19 15:04

>>77
Harvard professor of political science Robert D. Putnam conducted a nearly decade long study how multiculturalism affects social trust. He surveyed 26,200 people in 40 American communities, finding that when the data were adjusted for class, income and other factors, the more racially diverse a community is, the greater the loss of trust. People in diverse communities "don’t trust the local mayor, they don’t trust the local paper, they don’t trust other people and they don’t trust institutions," writes Putnam. In the presence of such ethnic diversity, Putnam maintains that: We hunker down. We act like turtles. The effect of diversity is worse than had been imagined. And it’s not just that we don’t trust people who are not like us. In diverse communities, we don’t trust people who do look like us.

Ethologist Frank Salter writes: Relatively homogeneous societies invest more in public goods, indicating a higher level of public altruism. For example, the degree of ethnic homogeneity correlates with the government's share of gross domestic product as well as the average wealth of citizens. Case studies of the United States, Africa and South-East Asia find that multi-ethnic societies are less charitable and less able to cooperate to develop public infrastructure. Moscow beggars receive more gifts from fellow ethnics than from other ethnies [sic]. A recent multi-city study of municipal spending on public goods in the United States found that ethnically or racially diverse cities spend a smaller portion of their budgets and less per capita on public services than do the more homogenous cities

Dick Lamm, former three-term Democratic governor of the US state of Colorado, wrote in his essay "I have a plan to destroy America": Diverse peoples worldwide are mostly engaged in hating each other - that is, when they are not killing each other. A diverse, peaceful, or stable society is against most historical precedent.

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-19 15:07

>>77
In Siberia, peasants dug holes, then put the communists upside down there, leaving their feet, up to knees, on the surface of the earth and then they gradually filled the hole with earth, watching the spasms of prisoner legs. Peasants happily debated, which communist will suffocate the last.

Transbaikal Cossacks taught the youth killing on prisoners.

In Tambov province peasants nailed commies with railroad nails in the left arm and left leg to a tree at the height of a meter above the ground and watched as these, deliberately incorrectly crucified communists, suffer.

Other common amusement included opening the belly of the captive communist, taking out the small intestine and nailing it to a tree or a telegraph pole, then drove the communist around the tree, watching intestines unwinding out of his belly.

After stripping naked the communist, peasants ripped off pieces of skin from his shoulders in the form of epaulettes, driving in nails in place of sprockets; skinning along the shoulder-belt - this operation is called "put on the uniform." It certainly required a lot of time and great art.

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-19 15:22

>>70
That is why any addict should be put to prison and anyone who sells or "helps" obtaining drugs should be punished by death penalty.
Fuck off and die, Nazi fucktard.  FUCK OFF AND DIE.

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-19 15:23

>>80
Unlike other races, the kike cannot produce things. He can't farm, he can't manufacture, he can't build. He can't work hard like other races can. All the kike can do is live off of the labor of other races. That's why they have to invent bullshit financial schemes to live off of our labor. We produce real goods, and the kike banks take the fruits of our labor and give themselves a cut, for doing absolutely nothing. All kikes can do is serve as lawyers, business people, politicians, and bankers- that is, people who produce nothing of real value, and exist entirely off of the labor and production of others.

Even in Israel the kikes like to pretend Israel produces technological innovations- it doesn't. American companies invest there, enticed by government offers of big loans if they do, and Israel steals technology from the American military to get ahead in the corporate world. If not for American companies and American subsidies and loans, they would be wiped out by now because the kike simply cannot produce anything of real value.

And that my friend is why it is absolutely necessary for them to infiltrate a host nation and persist until they gain access to its financial, business, and political lifelines by which they feed and support themselves.

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-19 15:42

>>81
Back to /newpol/, ``please''!

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-19 16:06

>>72
They should be getting help, but they cannot because society has shunned them.
Yes, yes they should, because the fulfillment of their sexuality cannot be accomplished without raping someone.  Even if they choose not to, they will always long for it and will always be unhappy.

Now, I personally believe the production of more explicit child pornography should be illegal, or at least it should go through a very thorough process to be made. Most ``child pornography'' out there is just lewd child modelling, mostly from an era or country where it was legal. The kids are smiling, the parents were paid, consent was given.
Um, child labor was banned a long long time ago, and for a very good reason.  Children have better things to do, such as getting ready to grow up into a functioning adult.

Distribution should definitely be legal, especially for content that already exists.
The fact that someone is acquiring such content is a fairly good indicator that they need help.  One thing is certain, putting them in prisons for that is not going to help them.  Psychological help and guidance will, however.  To be more clear, distribution (and possession) should lead to psychological inquiry, and never to prison.

Despite what people (seriously) seem to believe, there's no psychic field that makes kids relive their abuse every time some horny middle-aged man gets his jollies off to their pictures.
Blame organized religion for magical thinking.

Heterosexual pornography doesn't make men into rapists, and I doubt child pornography would significantly increase the number of child molesters.
Whoops, I disagree.  Sure, rape porn probably won't do anything to a 55-year old man who already has his sexual preferences set in stone, but it will probably make a little rapist out of a confused 14-year old who happens to fall on that as his ``first porn ever''.

Maybe there is no way a child can be psychologically ready for sex, and I think it is something that needs empirical research without any political drama or fear of censorship. Perhaps we could legalise adult-child sex but require the child to undergo a proper sex education, and for the adult to seek the parents' approval.
Children are simply not ready for that; human development takes fucking forever (20% of the average lifespan? what the fuck), and children (as well as many adults) do not have the psychological maturity to have sex.  Under these conditions, age caps are a ``good enough'' solution.

People have even started to call hebephiles and ephebophiles "paedophiles", which is ridiculous because the latter is perfectly normal.
Normality doesn't mean anything, and I hate you for using it in a supposedly rational discussion.  Depending on the age caps in place, ephebophiles may or may not be able to fulfill their sexuality; as long as they stick to them, I guess it's okay.

I think paedophilia, child pornography and child molestation are second only to the Holocaust in the list of things you are simply not allowed to talk about without agreeing with everyone else's accepted view. Even if you do, your reputation is destroyed forever.
That's because almost ``everyone else'' are TV-watching mouthbreathing retards.  And the 1% who do have a functioning brain (such as myself, or so I like to believe) will politely disagree and explain their position.

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-19 18:11

>>83
Normality doesn't mean anything, and I hate you for using it in a supposedly rational discussion.

Except when you're talking about social norms.

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-19 18:18

Seek help, anti-Jew shitposter

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-19 19:27

>>85
Seek the gas chamber, Jew shitposter

Name: sage 2012-09-19 21:10

/prog/ != /b/

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-20 1:30

>>87
! [ [spoiler]/prog/[/spoiler] != /b/ ]

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-20 1:33

>>88
/imageplate thefuckbacktogets/

Name: sage 2012-09-20 20:34

>>88
And? Still true.

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-14 12:59

umm we hate you too?
I'm just kiddin' man I'm high I don't hate anybody :)

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-14 13:23

>>1
what's your problem with weed? just a plant sir.

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-14 18:50

>>92 hey dude

>>1 yeah, those lazy pot heads sitting around on couches should be more like meth-heads, burglarizing everything within reach... you never see a meth-head sitting still.. xD plus it contributes to society, since big pharma makes a couple a dollars selling the ingredients.. *facepalm

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-14 18:56

Really, we don't even need 'planned obsolesence' as long as we have meth-heads, since instead of your new telly breaking down after a year, it'll be stolen 3 times in 6 months... It's Economic Stimulus !! ^^

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-14 19:03

Look at all the jobs they create.. Armed Guards in hospitals, Rehab Centres, 'Cooks', 'local Pawn stores', (i need more euphamisms lol)... they'd all be doing something useful if not for meth-heads..

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-14 19:16

Shit, i'm suprised the gov'ner doesn't run around burning down villages in the name of economic stimulus... There's a lot of work that goes into building a house.. =/ yay more taxes

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-14 19:19

oh wait, is that what war is for?

Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List