I hate marijuana users

I hate marijuana users.

I hate them with every fiber in my being. I hate them more than anything else in this world. I have more hate for them than anyone who has hate for something and I assume the rest of my Straight Edge brethren would sympathize with me.

Why do I hate them?

-They are breaking the law.
-They are using a substance that is more cancer-causing than tobacco and more harmful to the brain than alcohol.
-They make up bullshit lies about marijuana being a relatively safe substance and being useful for medicinal purposes despite the fact that there are tons of studies proving otherwise.
-They are influencing the mass media and our culture into condemning anyone who doesn't do drugs and glamorizing this poisonous deliriant of a drug.
-They verbally harass and condemn everyone who doesn't smoke weed.

I would also like to make clear that everyone who thinks weed should be legalized is a pot smoker. And I'm sure none of you Straight Edgers associate with anyone who smokes weed. Thanks for understanding where I'm coming from.

http://www.whitehousedrugpolicy.gov/drugfact/marijuana/index.html

>>80
Unlike other races, the kike cannot produce things. He can't farm, he can't manufacture, he can't build. He can't work hard like other races can. All the kike can do is live off of the labor of other races. That's why they have to invent bullshit financial schemes to live off of our labor. We produce real goods, and the kike banks take the fruits of our labor and give themselves a cut, for doing absolutely nothing. All kikes can do is serve as lawyers, business people, politicians, and bankers- that is, people who produce nothing of real value, and exist entirely off of the labor and production of others.

Even in Israel the kikes like to pretend Israel produces technological innovations- it doesn't. American companies invest there, enticed by government offers of big loans if they do, and Israel steals technology from the American military to get ahead in the corporate world. If not for American companies and American subsidies and loans, they would be wiped out by now because the kike simply cannot produce anything of real value.

And that my friend is why it is absolutely necessary for them to infiltrate a host nation and persist until they gain access to its financial, business, and political lifelines by which they feed and support themselves.

>>81
Back to /newpol/, ``please''!

>>72
They should be getting help, but they cannot because society has shunned them.
Yes, yes they should, because the fulfillment of their sexuality cannot be accomplished without raping someone.  Even if they choose not to, they will always long for it and will always be unhappy.

Now, I personally believe the production of more explicit child pornography should be illegal, or at least it should go through a very thorough process to be made. Most ``child pornography'' out there is just lewd child modelling, mostly from an era or country where it was legal. The kids are smiling, the parents were paid, consent was given.
Um, child labor was banned a long long time ago, and for a very good reason.  Children have better things to do, such as getting ready to grow up into a functioning adult.

Distribution should definitely be legal, especially for content that already exists.
The fact that someone is acquiring such content is a fairly good indicator that they need help.  One thing is certain, putting them in prisons for that is not going to help them.  Psychological help and guidance will, however.  To be more clear, distribution (and possession) should lead to psychological inquiry, and never to prison.

Despite what people (seriously) seem to believe, there's no psychic field that makes kids relive their abuse every time some horny middle-aged man gets his jollies off to their pictures.
Blame organized religion for magical thinking.

Heterosexual pornography doesn't make men into rapists, and I doubt child pornography would significantly increase the number of child molesters.
Whoops, I disagree.  Sure, rape porn probably won't do anything to a 55-year old man who already has his sexual preferences set in stone, but it will probably make a little rapist out of a confused 14-year old who happens to fall on that as his ``first porn ever''.

Maybe there is no way a child can be psychologically ready for sex, and I think it is something that needs empirical research without any political drama or fear of censorship. Perhaps we could legalise adult-child sex but require the child to undergo a proper sex education, and for the adult to seek the parents' approval.
Children are simply not ready for that; human development takes fucking forever (20% of the average lifespan? what the fuck), and children (as well as many adults) do not have the psychological maturity to have sex.  Under these conditions, age caps are a ``good enough'' solution.

People have even started to call hebephiles and ephebophiles "paedophiles", which is ridiculous because the latter is perfectly normal.
Normality doesn't mean anything, and I hate you for using it in a supposedly rational discussion.  Depending on the age caps in place, ephebophiles may or may not be able to fulfill their sexuality; as long as they stick to them, I guess it's okay.

I think paedophilia, child pornography and child molestation are second only to the Holocaust in the list of things you are simply not allowed to talk about without agreeing with everyone else's accepted view. Even if you do, your reputation is destroyed forever.
That's because almost ``everyone else'' are TV-watching mouthbreathing retards.  And the 1% who do have a functioning brain (such as myself, or so I like to believe) will politely disagree and explain their position.

>>83
Normality doesn't mean anything, and I hate you for using it in a supposedly rational discussion.

Except when you're talking about social norms.

Seek help, anti-Jew shitposter

>>85
Seek the gas chamber, Jew shitposter

/prog/ != /b/

>>87
! [ [spoiler]/prog/[/spoiler] != /b/ ]

>>88
/imageplate thefuckbacktogets/

>>88
And? Still true.

umm we hate you too?
I'm just kiddin' man I'm high I don't hate anybody :)

>>1
what's your problem with weed? just a plant sir.

>>92 hey dude

>>1 yeah, those lazy pot heads sitting around on couches should be more like meth-heads, burglarizing everything within reach... you never see a meth-head sitting still.. xD plus it contributes to society, since big pharma makes a couple a dollars selling the ingredients.. *facepalm

Really, we don't even need 'planned obsolesence' as long as we have meth-heads, since instead of your new telly breaking down after a year, it'll be stolen 3 times in 6 months... It's Economic Stimulus !! ^^

Look at all the jobs they create.. Armed Guards in hospitals, Rehab Centres, 'Cooks', 'local Pawn stores', (i need more euphamisms lol)... they'd all be doing something useful if not for meth-heads..

Shit, i'm suprised the gov'ner doesn't run around burning down villages in the name of economic stimulus... There's a lot of work that goes into building a house.. =/ yay more taxes

oh wait, is that what war is for?