Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

Shitty programming language

Name: Anonymous 2010-01-30 16:09

You know what the shittiest programming language ever is? Haskell. Seriously, you can't change the value of a variable, and functions can only have one argument. How do you expect to ever be able to write a real program in such a useless language?

Name: Anonymous 2010-01-30 16:14

I know right? And it has no loops, too, so you have to unroll them manually, and god help you if you don't know at design time if you don't know how many times a loop will need to run.

Name: Anonymous 2010-01-30 16:15

And it also has no IO.

Name: Anonymous 2010-01-30 17:35

4/10. You're just coming off as ignorant. You need better understanding to get a better score.

Name: Anonymous 2010-01-30 17:37

0/10

Name: Anonymous 2010-01-30 17:57

I don't expect you to write a real program.

Name: Anonymous 2010-01-30 18:21

*sigh* this shit again

Name: Anonymous 2010-01-30 18:24

>>1
I suppose if you can only pass one parameter per function you have to pass arrays.  Can't create arrays?  Your language sucks.

>>2
No loops?  No problem.  Just use recursion.  Can't do recursion?  Your language sucks.

>>3
No IO?  No problem.  The user sucks.

Name: Anonymous 2010-01-30 18:39

>>6
Well I'm sure as heck I won't be able to write a real one in Haskell.

Name: Anonymous 2010-01-30 19:00

>>4
You're just coming off as ignorant.
Isn't that the point of trolling, at least one method of it?

Name: Anonymous 2010-01-30 19:28

>>10
The point of good trolling is to make good inflammatory observations and conclusions. >>1 was just poor. Unlike /prog/'s greatest, he doesn't make me want to rage.

Name: Anonymous 2010-01-30 19:35

>>11
What about >>2, then? How was it?

Name: Anonymous 2010-01-30 19:49

>>11
The point of good trolling is to make good inflammatory observations and conclusions.
If their "good" observations than that's not trolling, just discussion.

Name: Anonymous 2010-01-30 20:43

>>8
Rather than arrays, if your language cannot take functional arguments and return functional arguments, it sucks.
>>11
agreed
>>12
>>2 was better, but not by much
>>13
I think you misunderstood >>11, it should probably be read as good (inflammatory discussions). Unfortunately, English text has ambiguous precedence.

Name: Anonymous 2010-12-09 21:45

Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List
All trademarks and copyrights on this site are owned by their respective parties. All comments and posts are the responsibility of their own posters.
- Tinychan + 2ch Mode -