Come home from work
open up /prog/
realize there's no programming discussion going on
refresh for the next 3 hours
masturbate, sleep
Name:
Anonymous2009-10-23 7:06
i felt the same way a while ago.
then i realised that i'm fully capable of making a thread that i do find interesting.
funny that
Name:
Anonymous2009-10-23 7:13
brotip: everyone thinks like this .
solution: post more .
Name:
Anonymous2009-10-23 8:06
;_;
Name:
Anonymous2009-10-23 8:53
I do that too, in fact, when I did my regular check right now I found this topic which does not seem to change the status quo and am now replying to it.
you lazy fucking wankers ! learn to program then come back and fucking post more and stop wasting the valuable time of us programmers . we have important things to do , like talking about recursion vs iteration , OOP shit and fight like relgious zealots over languages and IDEs .
you both should be ashamed , i am ashamed and the sussman would be ashamed if he would hear of this . learn fucking C or perl or lisp and non of these faggot languages and stop wasting time of EXPERT PROGRAMMERs because we have BBCode Business to do .
and quit your jobs , grow a unixbeard and learn to program .
I stayed up till 3am last night drinking wine and reading encyclopediadramatica.com. How did my life come to this?
Name:
Anonymous2009-10-23 14:52
>>1
i do extactly the same.
im not a programmer too.
i just love to waste my fucking life.
Name:
Anonymous2009-10-23 16:44
>>25
dont make me write a programming tut for /prog/riders!
you either fucking learn programming or i will make you and trust me this is not something you would enjoy.
>>32
How can you possibly know that if you don't know how to program You don't honestly believe what we post here do you? Except the Sepples hate, that is justified
I'm not sure why I'm so adamant about not tagging that
Name:
Anonymous2009-10-25 0:33
>>46
✔ Ridiculous indentation style
✔ Lack of [code] tag
✔ use of True and Null, instead of TRUE/NULL (assuming C source with #define TRUE 1 or similar), true/NULL (C99, or possibly Sepples), or even true/null (assuming Javascript)
✔ Pointless explicit comparison with boolean constant
✔ Poster is trolling
>>53
Well, perhaps that's how it ought to be. Indeed, if the meme does become humorous, or magically obtains non-forced meme status somehow, you would need to change these properties in another thread.
Name:
Anonymous2009-10-25 11:03
>>55
Made a patch for you: --- a/>>55
+++ b/>>55
@@ -19,7 +19,7 @@
int post(char*v_board){
if (value){
if ((forced && humour.value <= 0) || !strcmp(v_board, "prog")){
- while(true) dich_snake.post());
+ while(dich_snake.post());
}
else{
cout << value << endl;
This will allow for better error handling; with a change to dich_snake.post() so that a nonzero return value indicates a successful post, the loop will terminate e.g. when the thread is closed.
(Incidentally, that line had an error, perhaps you were already intending to implement this?)
While Dich Snake analysis is burgeoning and exciting area of work, I am dismayed that the work in this field is merely retreading old ground.
Is Dich Snake posting based only on the idea of it being an unfunny forced meme? No! That is a foolish stance to defend. It's very clear that those reasons are attributes of Dich Snake, and not causes.
When I proposed the first model of Dich Snake propagation I was young and looking only to get my name out and cement grant funding- a foolhardy need to distinguish myself at the forefront of Dich Snake study. The entire field has suffered for it.
I disavow the ideas put forth in my post (>>46), and I stress that all programs and algorithms henceforth avoid that development legacy.