RE: Post >>46
While Dich Snake analysis is burgeoning and exciting area of work, I am dismayed that the work in this field is merely retreading old ground.
Is Dich Snake posting based only on the idea of it being an unfunny forced meme? No! That is a foolish stance to defend. It's very clear that those reasons are
attributes of Dich Snake, and not causes.
When I proposed the first model of Dich Snake propagation I was young and looking only to get my name out and cement grant funding- a foolhardy need to distinguish myself at the forefront of Dich Snake study. The entire field has suffered for it.
I disavow the ideas put forth in my post (
>>46), and I stress that all programs and algorithms henceforth avoid that development legacy.
Thank you.