>>5
It's like >>3 said "Hey, guys, can someone close the door" and you replied "Ok, I'm gonna show you read you some renaissance poetry". You've broken an unspoken social convention.
In JavaScript, everything is an object (that is a lie, but for the sake of this article let's pretend that it's true).
aka "I can't present you with what is an object in Javascript because I don't know, but I know Javascript doesn't have objects only"
The article also made me realize what retarded blob of shit Javascript is. The use of "this" is not suited for a high-level language (or one that wants to be called as such). This is a problem even the C preprocessor can solve (for some cases):
#define bind_local(binding, value, body) \
do { binding = value; \
body; } while(0)
// alternative macro body:
// ((binding = (value)), body)
I know the author of the article likely won't reply, so I ask the javascript programmers of this board instead. Hit me back if you've got an adequate answer for javascripts inadequacy.
Name:
Anonymous2009-10-19 10:44
>>14
You're supposed to us JS as it was intended: Scheme with C inspired syntax.
Name:
Anonymous2009-10-19 10:45
>>14
Yeah, JavaScript sucks because it's a Lisp. If it was like C it'd be a good language.
>>14
Forgot mah scope #define bind_local(type, binding, value, body) \
do { { type binding = value; \
body; }; } while(0)
// alternative macro body:
// {((type binding = (value)), body)}
Fixed.
Name:
Anonymous2009-10-19 11:34
>>13
We've come a long long way together
Through the hard times and the good
I have to celebrate your anus, baby
I have to praise your anus like I should