Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon.

Pages: 1-4041-8081-

The C Programming Language 3rd Edition

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-17 18:53

My dad works at Prentice Hall and he told me that there were talks with K&R to release the book next year.

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-17 18:59

I hope it includes a dubstep remix of the Pointers and Arrays chapter.

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-17 19:00

I will not be trolled so easily, Anonymous-kun.

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-17 19:01

awesome.
i look forward to this

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-17 19:44

Is this the one textbook with "conjure the spirits of the computer" because I love that one song /prog/ did xD

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-17 19:56

>>5
BAD TROLL, BAD!
GET BACK TO YOUR BRIDGE

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-17 20:00

>>6
You seem to have made a mistake in your post. By prioritizing >>5 over >>1 when calling out a troll makes it seem almost like you don't believe that >>1 is trolling. For future reference, calling out troll posts in a troll-made thread is like saying there is water in the ocean, in that it is somewhat redundant.

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-17 20:12

>>7
how do you know it's a troll?
is it so implausible that K&R finally gets an update to cover ANSI C?

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-17 20:23

>>8
>Is it so implausible that K&R finally gets an updated cover?
This would be the most important.

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-17 20:25

>>9
I vote for a topless Sussman on the front cover.

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-17 20:43

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-17 21:08

>>11
this looks disturbingly like the sepples book.
IHIHBT

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-18 0:22

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-18 0:38

It needs a woodcut and pleasing squares on the cover, just like SICP and SICM.

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-18 2:21

>>13
I'm going to use this for the cover of the LaTeX version I'm working on. Thanks.

Name: TRUE TRUTH EXPERT !!TthtFzrtPXElUy7 2009-10-18 3:58

fOR WHAT REASON? kERNIGHAN/RITCHIE AIN'T THAT STOOPID.

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-18 11:27

Keep the covers coming!

Name: =+=*=F=R=O=Z=E=N==V=O=I=D=*=+= !frozEn/KIg 2009-10-18 15:34

The books will not make you a programmer,
 not matter how much time you repeat exercises in that book.
You could save trees and money if you learned things yourself.


__________________________________________
http://bayimg.com/image/aadbjaace.jpg
Now Playing:Give a Reason by Megumi Hayashibara
My Blog: http://frozenvoid.blogspot.com/
«You don't change the course of history by turning the faces of portraits to the wall.»

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-18 16:00

>>18
For an invisible poster, your quite an anus!

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-18 19:01

>>18
i lol'd.
it's funny because you're a horrible horrible "programmer" who can't use anything except javascript without falling flat on your face.
nobody sane would ever take your advice. infact, any sane person would do the opposite of what you tell them.

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-18 20:10

>>20
Really?  I think his advice is pretty sensible.

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-18 20:19

>>13
Is there a subtle joke I'm not getting here? >>11 was pretty obvious but this one isn't.

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-18 21:11

>>22
No, there is no subtle joke.
The joke is the weeaboo background.

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-18 21:28

>>22
The subtle joke is that it's over-the-top obnoxious.

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-18 21:31

>>22
Yes.  That is an anime character.  Lain is an anime character.  Lain likes Lisp.  Lisp is > C.  These were my intentions when designing that book cover.

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-18 21:56

>>25
So... Lain's a meme now, too?

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-18 21:57

>>26
Don't say that, or it will make it True

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-18 21:59

>>27
....Are you trying to rhyme?

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-18 21:59

>>28
Don't fuck with me, I don't have the Time

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-18 22:00

>>25
Lies. I designed the cover, and my sole intention was to honour the great nation of Japan.

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-18 22:06

>>26-29
At first I lol'd, but then I saw the timestamps. Then I sadfaced.

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-18 22:07

too much fail. im going to sleep.

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-18 22:19

>>22
There's a trend in Japan right now of slapping pictures of anime girls on stale shit fine consumer products that have been around for a while, so as to renew interest in said products and, subsequently, boost their sales.

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-18 22:30

>>13 here. I just wanted to make K&R more appealing for the younger generation.

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-18 22:56

>>34
GET OFF MY LAWN!

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-18 23:03

>>1-36
Same person, and we have been trolled constantly.

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-18 23:12

>>36
Ahaha fail

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-18 23:16

>>21
it's not even close to sensible.
but hey, take up his style of learning. doom yourself to become an incompetent programmer.
;) it just means that there's one less person for me to compete with.

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-18 23:23

>>39
What's you're fucking problem punk§

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-18 23:23

>>38
You would know this isn't true if you had a modicum of sense (I know, I know, IHBT, but bear with me). Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than knowledge does. An incompetent programmer that can oversell their skills will beat you to the high paying jobs.

I assume what's what you're referring to with "compete," because there's no other reason that it would matter.

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-18 23:34

>>40
"Ok, Mr. FrozenVoid, tell us about yourself."
"Well, I'm an master programmer with no fault in javascript and C. Infact I wrote my own opensource game and am planning to write an OS sometimes in the future."
"Well that certainly is impressive. Could you show us an example of your code?"
"Certainly! here:
main(int a,char**b){int x=strlen(b[0])>strlen(b[1])?strlen(b[0]):strlen(b[1])-1;for(;x>=0;--x)if(strlen(b[0])>strlen(b[1])b[0][x]=b[1][x];else b[1][x]=b[0][x];printf(strlen(b[0])>strlen(b[1])?b[0]:b[1]);}
I'm self taught, you know."
"EXCELLENT! YOU GET THE JOB!"

Kinda like that, eh?

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-18 23:52

>>41
Indeed, although I shudder at your example.

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-19 0:30

>>42
That is exactly the kind of shit FV writes.  Just read his fabulous blog (lol j/k nobody gives a shit what high-school kids think)

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-19 3:14

>>15
Just typeset the damn cover too

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-19 4:57

>>41
It's amazing to think that a year or two ago, I would've been completely outraged by that code, but now I can actually read it pretty easily.

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-19 8:28

>>45
I feel so sorry for you.
I can't imagine what horrible misfortunes have befallen you to give you that skill.

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-19 8:39

>>41
Redundant [code] tags.

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-19 10:59

>>8
ISO C, dude.

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-19 11:04

>>48
Ah, yeah.
In retrospect that was a pretty stupid mistake, what with all the /prog/riders who wrote ANSI C compilers when they were 12 years old.
I'm assuming that /prog/ isn't full of the underage.

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-19 11:12

>>49
I'm sure all /prog/lodytes are at least 12 years old.

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-19 11:15

I'm 12 and what is this

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-19 11:23

I'm this and what is a 12

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-19 11:26

I'm a Mac and what is C.

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-19 11:28

>>52 also made me realize what retarded blob of shit >>51 is. The use of "this" is not suited for a high-level language (or one that wants to be called as such). This is a problem even the C preprocessor can solve (for some cases):
#define bind_local(binding, value, body) \
  do { binding = value; \
       body; } while(0)
// alternative macro body:
// ((binding = (value)), body)
I know the author of the article likely won't reply, so I ask the >>51 programmers of this board instead. Hit me back if you've got an adequate answer for >>51's inadequacy.

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-19 11:30

>>54
lol what

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-19 11:31

>>55
It's what lispers actually believe

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-19 11:32

>>55
OKAY YOU FUQIN ANGERED AN EXPERT PROGRAMMER
GODFUCKIGNDAMN
FIRST OF ALL, YOU DONT FUQIN KNOW WHAT A MAN PAGE IS
SECONDLY, THIS IS /prog/ DO NOT DEMAND USEFUL ANSWERS THE WAY YOU WANT THEM TO BE
THIRDLY PROGRAMMING IS ALL ABOUT PHILOSOPHY AND ``ABSTRACT BULLSHITE'' THAT YOU WILL NEVER COMPREHEND
AND FUQIN LASTLY, FUCK OFF WITH YOUR BULLSHYT
EVERYTHING HAS ALREADY BEEN ANSWERED IN >>3,4,10

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-19 11:32

>>1
That'd be pretty cool, but I don't really see much of a reason for it. Maybe to cover some of the C99 stuff, like having a boolean type. Maybe a few words about threads, although I don't think there's a standard C way to do it; they'd probably just use pthreads for basic examples that could easily apply to almost any other thread implementation.

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-19 11:33

>>57
lol what

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-19 11:34

>>59
IF U WERE FLAMED FOR USING LISP TOMORROW, I WOULDNT GO 2 UR SUICIDE CUZ ID B N DAT CUNTS HOUSE N SHOVE SICP DOWN HIS THROAT!
                       //`'''```,
             o        // LISP   `.,
       ,....OOo.   .c;.',,,.'``.,,.`
    .'      ____.,'.//
   / _____  \___/.'
  | / ||  \\---\|
  ||  ||   \\  ||
  co  co    co co

WE TRUE SMUG LISP WEENIES
WE READ SICP TOGETHER
WE COUNT PARENTHESES TOGETHER
send this SUAVE SPACE TOAD to every thread you care about including this one if you care. C how many times you get this, if you get 6001 your A TRUE SMUG LISP WEENIE

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-19 11:35

they'd probably just use pthreads for basic examples that could easily apply to almost any other thread implementation.
No, they wouldn't. Ritchie nor Kernighan have anything to do with POSIX, nor do they want to. You're a gullible idiot.

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-19 11:37

>>61
This is what iso c fags actually believe

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-19 11:39

Well there was an explotion of posts, glad to share these moments with you but now thread is over, please abandon it.

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-19 11:48

2^6 GET

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-19 12:11

leftover flaoting point bits post

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-19 12:38

good spelling GET

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-19 23:34

I'm still awaiting that typeset version of SICP some anon said he was working on.

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-20 16:40

I can hardly wait to seat myself in my most comfortable recliner with pencil, paper, and a bottle of Scotch. With the Good Book at my side and the complete volumes of the Bible (collector's edition) in front of me, I'll read it from end to end while translating all the psalms from MMIX to C99. ;_;

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-20 19:49

>>68
Would you have gay sex with me?

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-20 19:52

>>68
The Bible, collector's edition?
I don't know why but I'm lolling very hard.

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-20 19:54

>>70
It comes fortnightly with a magazine building up into a complete collection, all for only £5.99 an issue. The first one was even half price ^_^

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-20 20:07

>>71
In the United States, we do not use the term "fortnight." Nor do we use your weighty currency.

Please be a bit more US-centric so we may be enriched by the things you have to say.

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-20 20:09

>>72
It comes once every two weeks with a magazine building up into a complete collection, all for only $10.99[1] an issue. The first one was even half price ^_^

1. Exchange rate unlikely to be accurate, but I don't care enough to check

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-20 20:20

>>73
damnit! i demand a post that is dynamically updated every 5 seconds with the current exchange rate!

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-20 20:22

>>73
5.99 in Swiss Francs is like $5.91 USD

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-21 5:55

jodelhudihui en wiitere schwiizer i de wiite vom arschloch vom internet

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-21 9:24

>>76
Votre pédé

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-22 11:19

>>68

You're Donald E. Knuth.

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-22 16:39

>>78
What about my Kunth?

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-22 18:17

>>79
It's misspelled. also バンプ

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-22 19:55

I should clarify that in >>86, the Good Book represents K&R, the Bible stands for TAoCP, and ;_; symbolizes my undying belief that both I and Knuth (us being, as you correctly surmise, the same person) will live to see this pass.

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-22 20:41

>>82
Did somebody not know that? Don't fucking joke with me, I'd leave /prog/ for this

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-22 20:55

>>82
> run 82
error - STACK OVERFLOW: Did you forget to break from a loop?

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-23 13:26

I think my stack just overflowed, if you catch my drift.

Name: ​​​​​​​​​​ 2010-09-08 14:37

Name: Anonymous 2010-12-10 10:26


Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List