I propose that this thread is one person ans we have been trolled constantly.
T/N
Name:
Anonymous2008-04-12 16:57
the opera guy or whatever combined with the sicp theme and we conjure the spirits of the comptuer with our spell is prob one of the best things ive ever heard, thank u
CAR CAR CAR CAR CDR CDR CDR CDR CAR CDR CAR CDR EVAL APPLY CAR CDR EVAL APPLY
Name:
Anonymous2008-04-12 17:07
Some people, when confronted with a problem, think "I know, I'll make a song about it." Now they have two probloms.
Name:
Anonymous2008-04-12 17:15
BOINC doesn't want to connect to LHC@home ;_;
Name:
Anonymous2008-04-12 17:15
WE CONJURE THE SPIRITS OF THE COMPUTER WITH OUR SPELLS WE CONJURE THE SPIRITS OF THE COMPUTER WITH OUR SPELLS WE CONJURE THE SPIRITS OF THE COMPUTER WITH OUR SPELLS WE CONJURE THE SPIRITS OF THE COMPUTER WITH OUR SPELLS WE CONJURE THE SPIRITS OF THE COMPUTER WITH OUR SPELLS WE CONJURE THE SPIRITS OF THE COMPUTER WITH OUR SPELLS WE CONJURE THE SPIRITS OF THE COMPUTER WITH OUR SPELLS WE CONJURE THE SPIRITS OF THE COMPUTER WITH OUR SPELLS WE CONJURE THE SPIRITS OF THE COMPUTER WITH OUR SPELLS WE CONJURE THE SPIRITS OF THE COMPUTER WITH OUR SPELLS WE CONJURE THE SPIRITS OF THE COMPUTER WITH OUR SPELLS WE CONJURE THE SPIRITS OF THE COMPUTER WITH OUR SPELLS WE CONJURE THE SPIRITS OF THE COMPUTER WITH OUR SPELLS
we conjure the spirits of the computer with our spells
we conjure the spirits of the computer with our spells
we conjure the spirits of the computer with our spells
we conjure the spirits of the computer with our spells
we conjure the spirits of the computer with our spells
we conjure the spirits of the computer with our spells
WE CONJURE THE SPIRITS OF THE COMPUTER WITH OUR SPELLS
Name:
Anonymous2008-04-13 8:34
>>38
Sure, but you're gonna need to jump through a few hoops to edit it. You'll need Reason 4, and the "Rackmounted Toybox" refill from http://www.combinatorhq.com/ (reg req'd) - I have included the choirs as one separate audio file since they require the ~1GB Symphony of Voices refill.
Or I could do a track-by-track audio export if someone wants.
I have discovered an amazing site. Turn the volume for your computer ON, and go to http://blocked.on.nimp.org with Internet Explorer. After going there with Internet Explorer, go there with Mozilla Firefox.
Name:
Anonymous2008-04-13 18:07
EXPERT BEAUTY
I lol'd. Then I cried. Then I read my SICP. Then I lol'd. Then I cried. Then I kept crying.
Don't put Johann Sebastian Bach's name on this clueless attempt made by a 12-year PHP programmer.
I like the idea, but honestly the performance is so primitive and substandard that it is almost conceptual.
Name:
Anonymous2008-04-13 20:32
Would you like to swing on a star
Carry moonbeams home in a jar
And be better off than you are
Or would you rather be a mule
A mule is an animal with long funny ears
He kicks up at anything he hears
His back is brawny and his brain is weak
He's just plain stupid with a stubborn streak
And - by the way - if you hate to go to school
You may grow up to be a mule
Or would you like to swing on a star
Carry moonbeams home in a jar
And be better off than you are
Or would you rather be a pig
A pig is an animal with dirt on his face
His shoes are a terrible disgrace
He ain't got no manners when he eats his food
Hes fat and lazy and extremely rude
But if you don't give a feather or a fig
You might grow up to be a pig
Or would you like to swing on a star
Carry moonbeams home in a jar
And be better off than you are
Or would you rather be a fish
A fish won't do anything but swim in a brook
He can't write his name or read a book
And to fool the people is his only thought
Though he's slippery he still gets caught
But then if that sort of life is what you wish
You may grow up to be a fish
And all the monkeys aren't in a zoo
Every day you meet quite a few
So you see its all up to you
You can be better than you are
You could be swinging on a star!
Name:
Anonymous2008-04-13 21:10
Or would you like to swing on a star
Carry moonbeams home in a jar
And be better off than you are
Or would you rather be PIG
A pig is an animal with BLOAT
His shoes are PIG DISGUSTING
He ain't got no manners when he eats his food
Hes fat and lazy and extremely SLOW
But if you don't give a feather or a fig
You might grow up to be FUCKING ENTERPRISE
Name:
Anonymous2008-04-13 21:15
This is now on my MP3 player.
Name:
Anonymous2008-04-13 21:17
I just had sex with a girl while listening to this music.
Name:
Anonymous2008-04-13 21:26
I was just raped by some pig disgusting nerd while he played some shitty computer song at me
Name:
Anonymous2008-04-13 21:33
I just watched a very handsome young man have vaginal intercourse with a very beautiful young woman while he played a very awesome computer song at the woman.
Name:
Anonymous2008-04-13 21:45
I just arrested some dirty old man for peeping through the window of some couple's bedroom window while they were screwing each other, manually.
Name:
Anonymous2008-04-13 22:06
>>64 window of some couple's bedroom window
REDUNDANCY
Name:
Anonymous2008-04-13 22:17
I'm prank calling people with the last name Sussman now.
We found an mp3 player someone had lost at work today. No-one has claimed it yet, but when they do, I'm sure they'll enjoy the addition of >>1's composition to their playlist.
>>78
It may suprise you to hear this, but I invented that meme.
It was originally an explanation of my posting of
``4GET''
in a troll thread. Other posters wanted to know if I wished I could ``forget'', but I replied, "Sometimes, a GET is just a GET'', thus creating that meme.
Name:
Anonymous2008-04-18 12:23
>>91
It may suprise you to hear this, but I invented the "It may suprise you to hear this, but I invented that meme" meme.
Name:
Anonymous2008-04-18 16:53
>>92
This may surprise you, but I invented fucking up memes.
Name:
Anonymous2008-04-20 8:47
RVVY
Name:
Anonymous2008-04-20 8:51
But the question remains:
[m] Have you Read
your
``
FIOC in Python in 24 hours
for dummies''
today?
[/]
Name:
Anonymous2008-04-20 8:55
Holy crap, I just checked /pr/ for like the third time and I saw the sepples snake in a sticky. Please explain yourselves.
Name:
Anonymous2008-04-20 8:57
Have you Read
your
``
FIOC in Python in 24 hours
for dummies''
today?
Oh, so you want to be disappointed with MY Christopher?
209.62.62.138
If you win, I'll drop dox on these folks.
If you lose, however, you leave /prog/ forever.
Hack me, you pussy.
Your friends are invited as well, I will be waiting.
proggit, pm me. You know who I am.
Oh, so you want to be expected by MY /prog/?
209.62.62.138
If you win, I'll drop penis on these folks.
If you lose, however, you leave /prog/ forever.
Hack me, you pussy.
Your friends are invited as well, I will be waiting.
proggit, pm me. You know who I am.
Name:
Anonymous2008-04-20 14:50
>>103
Completely made your
Processor overheat
Completely made your
Code obsolete
'Cause my complexity
Is NP-complete
Scheme or Lisp function elite, equipped
With shit that'll make you flip your bits
Java or C/C++ it's nuts
#define's a must
When your code's so robust
Poly-time approximations
For all you hatin'
Your runtime got you waitin'
While you cogiatin'
You honestly think that
You can simulate and model me
Follow me
Into the inner workings of a CS OG
Complex like NP
Is what you should expect to see
Last year, when Vista was new
We sold our optimized desktop value
And that's a pitch that never fails
And you saw lots of sales
But some enterprises said wait and see
We don't wanna adopt early
But that's all over 'cause of SP1
And our ecosystem!
http://www.badongo.com/file/9938528
Same file as >>41 (instructions in that post)
Trying Badongo, but it will probably be deleted in a month whatever I use.
WE CONJURE THE SPIRITS OF THE COMPUTER WITH OUR SPELLS WE CONJURE THE SPIRITS OF THE COMPUTER WITH OUR SPELLS WE CONJURE THE SPIRITS OF THE COMPUTER WITH OUR SPELLS WE CONJURE THE SPIRITS OF THE COMPUTER WITH OUR SPELLS WE CONJURE THE SPIRITS OF THE COMPUTER WITH OUR SPELLS WE CONJURE THE SPIRITS OF THE COMPUTER WITH OUR SPELLS WE CONJURE THE SPIRITS OF THE COMPUTER WITH OUR SPELLS WE CONJURE THE SPIRITS OF THE COMPUTER WITH OUR SPELLS WE CONJURE THE SPIRITS OF THE COMPUTER WITH OUR SPELLS WE CONJURE THE SPIRITS OF THE COMPUTER WITH OUR SPELLS WE CONJURE THE SPIRITS OF THE COMPUTER WITH OUR SPELLS WE CONJURE THE SPIRITS OF THE COMPUTER WITH OUR SPELLS WE CONJURE THE SPIRITS OF THE COMPUTER WITH OUR SPELLS
CAR CAR CAR CAR
CUDDER CUDDER CUDDER CUDDER
CAR CUDDER EVAL APPLY
CAR CUDDER EVAL APPLY
CAR CUDDER EVAL APPLY
CAR CUDDER EVAL APPLY
CAR CUDDER EVAL APPLY
CAR CUDDER EVAL APPLY
WE CONJURE THE SPIRITS OF THE COMPUTER WITH OUR SPELLS
WE CONJURE THE SPIRITS OF THE COMPUTER WITH OUR SPELLS
WE CONJURE THE SPIRITS OF THE COMPUTER WITH OUR SPELLS
WE CONJURE THE SPIRITS OF THE COMPUTER WITH OUR SPELLS
WE CONJURE THE SPIRITS OF THE COMPUTER WITH OUR SPELLS
WE CONJURE THE SPIRITS OF THE COMPUTER WITH OUR SPELLS
WE CONJURE THE SPIRITS OF THE COMPUTER WITH OUR SPELLS
WE CONJURE THE SPIRITS OF THE COMPUTER WITH OUR SPELLS
WE CONJURE THE SPIRITS OF THE COMPUTER WITH OUR SPELLS
WE CONJURE THE SPIRITS OF THE COMPUTER WITH OUR SPELLS
WE CONJURE THE SPIRITS OF THE COMPUTER WITH OUR SPELLS
WE CONJURE THE SPIRITS OF THE COMPUTER WITH OUR SPELLS
WE CONJURE THE SPIRITS OF THE COMPUTER WITH OUR SPELLS
WE CONJURE THE SPIRITS OF THE COMPUTER WITH OUR SPELLS
WE CONJURE THE SPIRITS OF THE COMPUTER WITH OUR SPELLS
WE CONJURE THE SPIRITS OF THE COMPUTER WITH OUR SPELLS
WE CONJURE THE SPIRITS OF THE COMPUTER WITH OUR SPELLS
WE CONJURE THE SPIRITS OF THE COMPUTER WITH OUR SPELLS
WE CONJURE THE SPIRITS OF THE COMPUTER WITH OUR SPELLS
WE CONJURE THE SPIRITS OF THE COMPUTER WITH OUR SPELLS
WE CONJURE THE SPIRITS OF THE COMPUTER WITH OUR SPELLS
WE CONJURE THE SPIRITS OF THE COMPUTER WITH OUR SPELLS
WE CONJURE THE SPIRITS OF THE COMPUTER WITH OUR SPELLS
WE CONJURE THE SPIRITS OF THE COMPUTER WITH OUR SPELLS
WE CONJURE THE SPIRITS OF THE COMPUTER WITH OUR SPELLS
WE CONJURE THE SPIRITS OF THE COMPUTER WITH OUR SPELLS
WE CONJURE THE SPIRITS OF THE COMPUTER WITH OUR SPELLS
WE CONJURE THE SPIRITS OF THE COMPUTER WITH OUR SPELLS
...etc
Name:
Anonymous2009-11-26 7:10
i have gvr_fioc.ogg which is not music but is lollz
03:12 <Riastradh>klutometis, Gerry Sussman just sent me a link that I think you would appreciate: <http://www.tindeck.com/listen/stwv>;. He wasn't sure what to make of it, and is soliciting opinions. He asked, `What do you make of it? Should we start a religion?'
03:14 <chandler>That's, um, interesting listening.
03:15 <arthurmaciel>Gee, Gerry Sussman also composes! heh
03:15 <Riastradh>No, he didn't compose it. He has no idea who did.
03:15 <offby1>Moses supposes that Sussman composes, but Moses supposes erroneously.
03:16 <Riastradh>For Moses, he knowses that Suss don't composes, yet Moses...gosh, I can't remember the rest now. I guess I fail this elocution lesson.
03:16 <p1dzkl>Riastradh: it's from /prog/, which he may remember after receiving 'fan club' email
03:17 <p1dzkl>Sussman found it very strange, and deemed it unscientific
[....]
20:35 <klutometis>Riastradh: thanks for the link; i almost wish it were less aleatoric; it makes me yearn, actually, to write some rigorous counterpoint in honor of sussman
20:36 <klutometis>Riastradh: something numerologically pregnant; maybe even a counterpoint framework in scheme
20:37 <leppie>isn't that a bit extreme?
20:39 <klutometis>leppie: what?
20:40 <leppie>all those big words
20:41 <klutometis>leppie: well, fugue writing is the original procedural composition, i believe;
20:42 <klutometis>leppie: maybe one can make the case that it's functional
20:42 <klutometis>leppie: but that requires a lambda calculus of music
20:42 <leppie>ok.
20:44 <TimMc>klutometis: I assume you are referring to the MP3?
20:44 <klutometis>TimMc: yeah
20:44 <TimMc>I'm not sure it dignifies a response, actually.
20:45 <klutometis>interesting idea; poor execution
20:45 *leppie is still clueless
20:46 <klutometis>leppie: http://www.tindeck.com/listen/stwv
20:46 <TimMc>leppie: http://ccl.clozure.com/irc-logs/scheme/2009-08/scheme-2009.08.26.txt @ 01:12:18
20:47 <leppie>is that some shakespear thing?
20:49 <klutometis>leppie: it's a vaguely sicp thing
20:49 <leppie>omg this is aweful, bad early 90's flashbacks!
20:50 <leppie>that just hurt my brain :(
20:51 <leppie>unless I am missing some hidden message thingy..
So the Sussman heard and did not loathe my work. I can check off a "Lifetime accomplishment" box right now. Maybe two, even.
>>164
Wow, I haven't been on #scheme in the longest time
02:17 <TimMc>incubot: What is the antonym of "syntactic sugar"?
I actually had this discussion the other day, but the best thing I could think of was "syntactic lemon"
>>169
Syntactic salt is the official term, although it technically describes a type of syntax that makes something harder instead of easier. There is no true phrase for an antonym, which would be a lack of syntax to do something easily.
>>178
You can think of tastes as values going from 0 to either a bound or infinity. Now, take sugar: let's assume its sweetness rating is 1. Salt would have a saltiness rating of 1, but saltiness isn't the opposite of sweetness. The opposite of sugar and salt would be flour, as it would have both sweetness and saltiness and sourness at 0.
Name:
Anonymous2010-02-16 14:12
>>183
But what if we consider the complimentary taste as an opposite? That's what the artists do with colours (as opposed to the scientists).