Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

I AM AN EXPERT MUSICIAN

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-12 16:44

Name: Anonymous 2009-11-26 11:21

>>160
wat

Name: Anonymous 2009-11-26 13:21

>>149
Actually it was not me! Thanks for pointing out how popular I am, probably on Reddit.

Name: Anonymous 2009-11-26 15:24

>>162
Sorry, my pedigree chum, I don't use Reddit.

Name: Anonymous 2009-11-27 0:59

Oh wow, http://rotty.yi.org/irclogs/freenode/%23scheme/2009-08-26/

03:12    <Riastradh>klutometis, Gerry Sussman just sent me a link that I think you would appreciate: <http://www.tindeck.com/listen/stwv>;. He wasn't sure what to make of it, and is soliciting opinions. He asked, `What do you make of it? Should we start a religion?'
03:14    <chandler>That's, um, interesting listening.
03:15    <arthurmaciel>Gee, Gerry Sussman also composes! heh
03:15    <Riastradh>No, he didn't compose it. He has no idea who did.
03:15    <offby1>Moses supposes that Sussman composes, but Moses supposes erroneously.
03:16    <Riastradh>For Moses, he knowses that Suss don't composes, yet Moses...gosh, I can't remember the rest now. I guess I fail this elocution lesson.
03:16    <p1dzkl>Riastradh: it's from /prog/, which he may remember after receiving 'fan club' email
03:17    <p1dzkl>Sussman found it very strange, and deemed it unscientific
[....]
20:35    <klutometis>Riastradh: thanks for the link; i almost wish it were less aleatoric; it makes me yearn, actually, to write some rigorous counterpoint in honor of sussman
20:36    <klutometis>Riastradh: something numerologically pregnant; maybe even a counterpoint framework in scheme
20:37    <leppie>isn't that a bit extreme?
20:39    <klutometis>leppie: what?
20:40    <leppie>all those big words
20:41    <klutometis>leppie: well, fugue writing is the original procedural composition, i believe;
20:42    <klutometis>leppie: maybe one can make the case that it's functional
20:42    <klutometis>leppie: but that requires a lambda calculus of music
20:42    <leppie>ok.
20:44    <TimMc>klutometis: I assume you are referring to the MP3?
20:44    <klutometis>TimMc: yeah
20:44    <TimMc>I'm not sure it dignifies a response, actually.
20:45    <klutometis>interesting idea; poor execution
20:45    *leppie is still clueless
20:46    <klutometis>leppie: http://www.tindeck.com/listen/stwv
20:46    <TimMc>leppie: http://ccl.clozure.com/irc-logs/scheme/2009-08/scheme-2009.08.26.txt @ 01:12:18
20:47    <leppie>is that some shakespear thing?
20:49    <klutometis>leppie: it's a vaguely sicp thing
20:49    <leppie>omg this is aweful, bad early 90's flashbacks!
20:50    <leppie>that just hurt my brain :(
20:51    <leppie>unless I am missing some hidden message thingy..


So the Sussman heard and did not loathe my work. I can check off a "Lifetime accomplishment" box right now. Maybe two, even.

Name: Anonymous 2009-11-27 1:33

>>164
This has me laughing, and I'm not quite sure why.

Name: Anonymous 2009-11-27 3:00

>>165
/prog/ makes me laugh often but I probably shouldn't.

Name: Anonymous 2009-11-27 5:31

And The Suss Saw That It Was Good

Name: Anonymous 2009-11-27 5:37

>>164
wow.
awesome.

Name: Anonymous 2009-11-27 5:57

>>164
Wow, I haven't been on #scheme in the longest time


02:17    <TimMc>incubot: What is the antonym of "syntactic sugar"?
I actually had this discussion the other day, but the best thing I could think of was "syntactic lemon"

Name: Anonymous 2009-11-27 6:08

epi[spoiler]pc[/spoiler}

Name: Anonymous 2009-11-27 6:10

EMANCIPATE MY ANUS

Name: Anonymous 2009-11-27 20:33

>>169
Syntactic salt is the official term, although it technically describes a type of syntax that makes something harder instead of easier. There is no true phrase for an antonym, which would be a lack of syntax to do something easily.

Name: Anonymous 2009-11-28 0:23

bumpan for the Abelson mention.

Name: Anonymous 2009-11-28 4:51

>>164
So the sussman lurks prog?

Name: Anonymous 2009-11-28 7:27

>>174
Sussman was linked to GJS feat JSB.

Name: Anonymous 2009-11-28 11:17

>>175
Also known as the ``SICP Theme Song''.

Name: Anonymous 2009-11-28 11:39

>>172
Salt isn't the opposite of sugar.
The antonym would be ``syntactic flour''.

Name: Anonymous 2009-11-28 11:52

>>177
why? why is flour the opposite of sugar. you are a complete retard unless you come up with a valid explanation RIghT NOW

Name: Anonymous 2009-11-28 15:37

Name: Anonymous 2009-11-28 16:39

Name: Anonymous 2009-11-28 17:04

syntactic butter

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-16 12:38

>>80
You're an anus!

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-16 14:06

>>178
You can think of tastes as values going from 0 to either a bound or infinity. Now, take sugar: let's assume its sweetness rating is 1. Salt would have a saltiness rating of 1, but saltiness isn't the opposite of sweetness. The opposite of sugar and salt would be flour, as it would have both sweetness and saltiness and sourness at 0.

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-16 14:12

>>183
But what if we consider the complimentary taste as an opposite? That's what the artists do with colours (as opposed to the scientists).

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-16 14:16

>>184
There are 5 tastes. Now pair them up.

The main problem is that ``opposite'' isn't a well-defined operator.

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-16 14:18

>let's assume its sweetness rating is 1.
Sucralose is approximately 600 times as sweet  as sucrose  (table sugar),

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-16 14:52

>>186
QUOTE FAILURE

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-16 15:13

>>186
The choice of scale is inconsequential.

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-16 15:34

I read that as "I AM AN EXPERT MAGICIAN"

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-16 15:41

JSB-Sebastian-Bach

This thoughtless recursion bothers me immensely.

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-16 15:44

This thoughtless recursion bothers me immensely.
.. As does the OP's pathetic attempts at musicianship

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-16 16:01

>>191
IHBT.

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-17 20:58

CONJURE MY ANUS

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-18 11:50

>>192
Nothing of the sort my good Anon, OP's shit sucks

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-18 13:00

>>194
Philistine. IHBTT

Name: Anonymous 2010-03-03 4:37

WE BUMP THE SPIRITS OF THE THREAD WITH OUR PANTSU

Name: Anonymous 2010-03-03 5:05

>>1
Beautiful work!

Name: Anonymous 2010-03-03 5:51

>>196
WE PANTS THE BAMPU OF THE SPIRIT WITH OUR THREAD

Name: Anonymous 2010-03-03 16:50

bampu pantsu

Name: Anonymous 2010-03-03 18:17

>>191
Blame Bach, not me. He did not provide strong enough material to let my arranging talent shine.

Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List