Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon.

Pages: 1-4041-8081-

JAVA is Awesome

Name: Anonymous 2006-11-07 8:48

I just started learning JAVA and I can't believe how awesome it is. The best thing about it is that I can run it in virtually every OS out there. Same can't be said of the other languages.

Name: Anonymous 2006-11-07 11:20

And what's more, the API is so rich I can do *anything* with it. The logical design makes it so easy to use, too!

Name: Anonymous 2006-11-07 11:22

Obvious troll.

Name: Anonymous 2006-11-07 11:54

>>1,2
Forget it, it's NP-complete.

Name: Anonymous 2006-11-07 12:04

Your idea of virtually any OS is a pretty limited subset.

Name: Anonymous 2006-11-07 12:19

>>5
J2ME runs on practially anything. A research group in Austria even got it running on a ZX Spectrum!

Name: Anonymous 2006-11-07 12:20 (sage)

>>6
get it running on an atari 600 xl and i'll be impressed.

Name: Anonymous 2006-11-09 20:40

For as much of a bad rap that Java gets, I really enjoy it too.

Name: Anonymous 2006-11-09 22:04

Java sucks shit. It only just got generics. Stick with the CLR.

(And this coming from a Linux user.)

Name: Anonymous 2006-11-10 6:19 (sage)

Incompatible implementations of the J2ME run on anything. A research group in Austria even got it compatible on a ZX Spectrum and nothing else!
fixed.

Name: Anonymous 2006-11-10 8:02

>>10

It's not true anyway.

Name: Anonymous 2006-11-10 13:26

Java sucks man

Name: Anonymous 2006-11-10 14:25

The combo "C++ / STL / Boost" kicks Java's ass!

Name: Anonymous 2006-11-10 21:53

FREEBASIC OR GTFO

Name: Anonymous 2006-11-11 7:12

I like Java. Reading good Java code is like reading a good poem.

Name: Anonymous 2006-11-11 7:24

Reading Java is like stabbing yourself in the eye repeatedly with BASIC.

Name: Anonymous 2006-11-12 15:16

>>1
JAVA is FAIL. Learn to use C and the standard C library.

Or just STICK TO ONE OS. if others don't run a OS yuor program runs on, they can go FUCK THEMSELVES, or you can GIVE OUT YOUR SOURCE (*gasp*, what a concept! </sarcasm>) and have them PORT IT TO THEIR OS.

It's worked for everyone else for the past 30 years.

Name: Anonymous 2006-11-12 16:09 (sage)

Yeah, programming in C works fine. Except for all the security holes and memory leaks, of course.

Name: Anonymous 2006-11-12 17:17

>>18


And that is the fault of C? Hardly.

Name: Anonymous 2006-11-12 18:04

>>19
Then whose fault is it?

The standard library? It's part of the C spec.

The developer? A language that allows guaranteed fallible humans to do dangerous things easily is naive.

Name: Anonymous 2006-11-12 19:27

>>20
a language that doesn't allow guaranteed fallible humans to do dangerous things easily is useless.

Name: Anonymous 2006-11-12 19:54

>>21
My dear friend, please think carefully about what was written.

It's one thing to let people do dangerous things. It's another to allow them to do it easily. Note the "easily".

Hyperbole and knee-jerk won't get you far in this discipline.

Name: Anonymous 2006-11-12 20:45

It's one thing to let people do dangerous things. It's another to allow them to do it easily. Note the "easily".
if you try to make everything that could be dangerous difficult, you'll end up making mundane tasks difficult, too.

Name: Anonymous 2006-11-12 21:00

>>23
First, the "everything" and "could" is solely your own interpretation. Second, I'd like you to elaborate on that assertion a little.

Name: Anonymous 2006-11-13 1:05

penis

Name: Anonymous 2006-11-13 4:17

>>21, >>23 and >>25 are right

Name: Anonymous 2006-11-13 6:17

Java makes it very easy to become fucking stupid, and that's dangerous. In fact, that's the only path with java: to become a fucking stupid clueless moron.

Name: Anonymous 2006-11-13 7:00

you all just got fukken trolled ROFL

gg

Name: Anonymous 2006-11-13 7:04 (sage)

>>1-27
same person.
>>28
YHBT

Name: Anonymous 2006-11-13 11:23

>>28
you just got fukken suckered ROFL

gg

Name: Anonymous 2006-11-13 11:33

>>1-29
same person

>>30
YHBT

Name: Anonymous 2006-11-13 11:51

>>1-31
same person

>>32
YHBT

Name: Anonymous 2006-11-13 12:37

>>1-1000
same person

This thread is threadstopped. You can't reply anymore.

Name: Anonymous 2006-11-13 14:21

This thread is threadstopped. You can't reply anymore.
:(

Name: Anonymous 2006-11-13 20:55

http://www.tiobe.com/tpci.htm

That's right, they're all the idiots, and you losers see through the bullshit.

Name: Anonymous 2006-11-13 23:18

The ratings are based on the world-wide availability of skilled engineers, courses and third party vendors.

Supply and demand. Supply and demand.

MacDonald's is also in high demand...

Name: Anonymous 2006-11-14 7:24

what's macdonald's? i've never heard of it...

Name: Anonymous 2006-11-14 8:12

Correct, we can see through the bullshit that Enterprise Scalable Web 2.0 AJAX managers can't. Sun hopes to keep you stupid, and it's working; on you anyway.

5 "skilled engineers" to build a steaming pile of shit vs. 1 to build a solid product. Naturally the steaming pile of shit builders will be "in demand."

Name: Anonymous 2006-11-14 21:16

yup

Name: Anonymous 2007-08-04 14:13 ID:n7XsgOxO

poop

Name: Anonymous 2007-08-04 14:20 ID:5qFe2n+m

public static void main()

i hate java because of that little line above.

Name: Anonymous 2007-08-04 14:57 ID:tDb+2/60

>>41
thats wrong, you should use public static int main()

Name: Anonymous 2007-08-04 17:14 ID:KcgKznaY

LOL

I bet nobody on this board has even written a working Hello World in any language.

Name: Anonymous 2007-08-04 17:16 ID:E6Itx3eB

@ecoh off
@echo HELLO WORLD %1-SAN

Name: Anonymous 2007-08-04 17:17 ID:ijT5P0Nk

>>43
That's getting a bit old.

Name: Anonymous 2007-08-04 17:48 ID:LhxPM5RA

>>41-42
I've always used public static void main(String[] args).

Name: Anonymous 2007-08-04 18:21 ID:tDb+2/60

>>46
no wonder you don't like java

Name: Anonymous 2007-08-04 18:25 ID:xHMEOvp0

>>46
I've always used int main(int argc, char** argv)

Name: Anonymous 2007-08-04 18:32 ID:NUU5hgpg

>>48
what function does it serve (why not use String[])? explain so I may look leet in my lame CS101

Name: Anonymous 2007-08-04 18:40 ID:Heaven

>>49
What?! WTF is String[]?

Name: Anonymous 2007-08-04 18:43 ID:Heaven

Mercysage.

Name: Anonymous 2007-08-04 18:45 ID:tDb+2/60

>>49
we're talking about java here.. I think you might be confused

Name: Anonymous 2007-08-05 9:57 ID:MZ5lsr+b

PAY ATTENTION TO NEXT THREAD

Name: Anonymous 2007-08-05 10:02 ID:rUttQXQ3

Yeah, I'm fucking talking to you, /prog/ and all of you stupid asswipes who post here with your shitty wannabe elitist crap.

I run a Linux server.  I wanted it to handle my torrents instead of me.  I wanted to be able to access it via a web browser, and have it run constantly.  I did not want a gui at all.  There were not a lot of choices for me.  Basically btpd and Azureus.

After some consideration, and reading, I chose Azureus.  Never knew it had a console-only mode.  I installed it.  This necessitated me to install the Java runtime.  You guys have commented on various occasions about the slowness of Java and memory leaks.  So I was worried.

Well, assholes, the shit's been running for about two weeks (on my server which has an uptime of 43 days) and the performance of my server has not been impacted, even when it's handling three simultaneous torrents.  Nor is it a memory hog, and I don't notice an increase in it's memory footprint over time.

Azureus rocks.  Fuck off, you dumb motherfuckers.

Oh, and my server isn't a powerful machine.  500Mhz Celeron CPU with 256MB RAM running 2.6.19.

Again, fuck off.

In before flurry of memes, useless comments, faggotry, and Redcream flood.

Name: Anonymous 2007-08-05 13:41 ID:Heaven

>>54
blahblahblahgarbagegarbageblahmoregarbagejavafag.

Name: Anonymous 2007-08-05 20:14 ID:rUttQXQ3

>>55
I dont understand the reason for sage

Name: Anonymous 2007-08-05 20:19 ID:Heaven

Name: Anonymous 2007-08-05 20:31 ID:Heaven

>>55-57
Sage is not a insult.
Contrary to popular belief, sage should never be considered as a rude gesture or insult. In fact, someone writing insults or trolls to the thread and posting with sage are doing a good thing, since their useless post won't be brought to the attention of the rest of the board. The idea of sage being an insult came from imageboards, where filling up a thread with enough posts would get it removed. However, threads on channel4 take one thousand posts before they are closed, so the effect doesn't work here.

Name: Anonymous 2007-08-05 20:43 ID:rUttQXQ3

>>58
Nope, it is YOU who does not understand sage

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-05 18:54 ID:kZ2c7vho

>>35
vb is #3

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-05 22:56 ID:ijg4duVv

>>60
seeing VB next to C is sad ;_;

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-05 23:19 ID:y15dqYs5

sage dynasty

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-06 1:57 ID:5pyQXj6W

So guys, can you help me learn how to HTML?

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-06 2:01 ID:Heaven

<html>
  <sage />
</html>

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-06 2:03 ID:OWm6JCl9

<?xml version="2.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<content ns1:xmlns="http://dis.4chan.org/xml/sage3.0">;
    <ns1:sage />
</content>

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-06 2:25 ID:DaLoOWFf

>>65
ur prog has a 404 there

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-06 2:27 ID:OWm6JCl9

>>66

Namespace URLs don't have to exist, sillybuns.

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-06 4:20 ID:JVTOE7zY

>>67
Crazy, isn't it.

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-06 4:39 ID:eTpqqsDE

The reason noone on /prog/ likes java is they're mostly hobby coders who'll never have to use it to write a huge and difficult to maintain program.

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-06 4:44 ID:Heaven

>>10
Yes it is. I had to do some major Java crap once and it was a huge fucking headache to make everything compatible. It still only ran on a subset of available JVM's.

>>6
I bet it ran so slow it wasn't usable.

>>1
Obvious troll is obvious.
Regardless, I will bite: any VM-based or directly interpreted language can do the same. Some are even less retarded than Java is. Java's major features: broken object system, horribly overengineered class library, stupid programming conventions, reliance on get/set methods for everything... In work here I saw a Java class one of the other guys (who is better at Java than I am) wrote and it was about 200 lines of code LARGER than a class I wrote in Python. They worked identically, yet mine was 50 lines, his was 250... Yay for Java..

>>1-69
sage

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-06 4:47 ID:DaLoOWFf

>>69
Exactly--people who use Java are nothing but worthless hobby coders.

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-06 4:52 ID:W+DaWEWi

>>71
agree

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-06 7:17 ID:eTpqqsDE

>>71
:| that's what i said.

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-06 7:55 ID:W+DaWEWi

>>69-73
agreed

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-06 7:55 ID:W+DaWEWi

>>74
oops, forgot i already agreed.. fail

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-06 7:58 ID:Heaven

>>56
>>59
Obviously you don't understand sage since you the same idiot as >>54

Name: ا 2007-09-06 12:16 ID:Heaven

sigh

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-14 13:47

gb2/g/

Name: Trollbot9000 2009-07-01 10:51

Likes the Web and it seems that  just these two  practices is that  I can run  Java without a  virtual machine My  favorite feature is  the enterprise quality  of Java After  I graduate I  plan to move  to Japan and  not in china  or corea korea.

Name: Anonymous 2010-12-20 15:36

Name: Sgt.Kabu审Ȋkimanꔦ巌 2012-05-28 20:53

Bringing /prog/ back to its people
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy

Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List