Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

JAVA is Awesome

Name: Anonymous 2006-11-07 8:48

I just started learning JAVA and I can't believe how awesome it is. The best thing about it is that I can run it in virtually every OS out there. Same can't be said of the other languages.

Name: Anonymous 2006-11-07 11:20

And what's more, the API is so rich I can do *anything* with it. The logical design makes it so easy to use, too!

Name: Anonymous 2006-11-07 11:22

Obvious troll.

Name: Anonymous 2006-11-07 11:54

>>1,2
Forget it, it's NP-complete.

Name: Anonymous 2006-11-07 12:04

Your idea of virtually any OS is a pretty limited subset.

Name: Anonymous 2006-11-07 12:19

>>5
J2ME runs on practially anything. A research group in Austria even got it running on a ZX Spectrum!

Name: Anonymous 2006-11-07 12:20 (sage)

>>6
get it running on an atari 600 xl and i'll be impressed.

Name: Anonymous 2006-11-09 20:40

For as much of a bad rap that Java gets, I really enjoy it too.

Name: Anonymous 2006-11-09 22:04

Java sucks shit. It only just got generics. Stick with the CLR.

(And this coming from a Linux user.)

Name: Anonymous 2006-11-10 6:19 (sage)

Incompatible implementations of the J2ME run on anything. A research group in Austria even got it compatible on a ZX Spectrum and nothing else!
fixed.

Name: Anonymous 2006-11-10 8:02

>>10

It's not true anyway.

Name: Anonymous 2006-11-10 13:26

Java sucks man

Name: Anonymous 2006-11-10 14:25

The combo "C++ / STL / Boost" kicks Java's ass!

Name: Anonymous 2006-11-10 21:53

FREEBASIC OR GTFO

Name: Anonymous 2006-11-11 7:12

I like Java. Reading good Java code is like reading a good poem.

Name: Anonymous 2006-11-11 7:24

Reading Java is like stabbing yourself in the eye repeatedly with BASIC.

Name: Anonymous 2006-11-12 15:16

>>1
JAVA is FAIL. Learn to use C and the standard C library.

Or just STICK TO ONE OS. if others don't run a OS yuor program runs on, they can go FUCK THEMSELVES, or you can GIVE OUT YOUR SOURCE (*gasp*, what a concept! </sarcasm>) and have them PORT IT TO THEIR OS.

It's worked for everyone else for the past 30 years.

Name: Anonymous 2006-11-12 16:09 (sage)

Yeah, programming in C works fine. Except for all the security holes and memory leaks, of course.

Name: Anonymous 2006-11-12 17:17

>>18


And that is the fault of C? Hardly.

Name: Anonymous 2006-11-12 18:04

>>19
Then whose fault is it?

The standard library? It's part of the C spec.

The developer? A language that allows guaranteed fallible humans to do dangerous things easily is naive.

Name: Anonymous 2006-11-12 19:27

>>20
a language that doesn't allow guaranteed fallible humans to do dangerous things easily is useless.

Name: Anonymous 2006-11-12 19:54

>>21
My dear friend, please think carefully about what was written.

It's one thing to let people do dangerous things. It's another to allow them to do it easily. Note the "easily".

Hyperbole and knee-jerk won't get you far in this discipline.

Name: Anonymous 2006-11-12 20:45

It's one thing to let people do dangerous things. It's another to allow them to do it easily. Note the "easily".
if you try to make everything that could be dangerous difficult, you'll end up making mundane tasks difficult, too.

Name: Anonymous 2006-11-12 21:00

>>23
First, the "everything" and "could" is solely your own interpretation. Second, I'd like you to elaborate on that assertion a little.

Name: Anonymous 2006-11-13 1:05

penis

Name: Anonymous 2006-11-13 4:17

>>21, >>23 and >>25 are right

Name: Anonymous 2006-11-13 6:17

Java makes it very easy to become fucking stupid, and that's dangerous. In fact, that's the only path with java: to become a fucking stupid clueless moron.

Name: Anonymous 2006-11-13 7:00

you all just got fukken trolled ROFL

gg

Name: Anonymous 2006-11-13 7:04 (sage)

>>1-27
same person.
>>28
YHBT

Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List