>>10
Yes it is. I had to do some major Java crap once and it was a huge fucking headache to make everything compatible. It still only ran on a subset of available JVM's.
>>6
I bet it ran so slow it wasn't usable.
>>1
Obvious troll is obvious.
Regardless, I will bite: any VM-based or directly interpreted language can do the same. Some are even less retarded than Java is. Java's major features: broken object system, horribly overengineered class library, stupid programming conventions, reliance on get/set methods for everything... In work here I saw a Java class one of the other guys (who is better at Java than I am) wrote and it was about 200 lines of code LARGER than a class I wrote in Python. They worked identically, yet mine was 50 lines, his was 250... Yay for Java..
>>1-69
sage