Thank goodness a locksmith had pasted his ad on my meter box."
Later...
Locksmith : "There, I've unlocked your door. That'll be $50."
Man : "You mean it's free of charge or I'll report you to the authorities for vandalising public property with your stickers..."
Legal Question : Should the man pay the locksmith and should the locksmith charged with vandalism ?
Name:
Anonymous2013-05-27 18:05
"I'll call your parents" is a empty threat that does nothing to bullies. It just gets your ass beat harder. Keep your mouth shut and actually call those parents and report their activity. Actions speak louder than words.
If he ordered the service, it's clearly no longer vandalism.
If the sticker was offensive, he wouldn't have ordered the service in the first place and the charge would stick.
If the locksmith changed the locks and then waited outside until the guy was locked out and then appeared out of nowhere to open /unlock his door and then charge him cash at gun-point for a service that the resident never asked for, then the criminal intent is more obvious. Anyone who says out-loud to a criminal what their intentions are will never live long enough to even have a opportunity to snitch.
Name:
Anonymous2013-05-27 18:11
>>1
This creeps me out because I recently had something like this happen over the phone. Except it wasn't a locksmith but a contracted civilian employee hired by a federal agency who carelessly left a key unsecured. I reported it because I ended up being locked out and I ended up using the unsecured key. They kept apologizing over the phone but I wasn't mad. I was just letting them know that their primary objective could have been severely compromised if the enemy had the common sense to check the hidden sector where the locked artifact was hidden. It's they who would have stopped being paid if their objective was terminated. I would still be at risk for being homeless in either scenario. Meanwhile, asshole beggars have the nerve to approach me, despite the fact that I live off of food-stamps. I hate those dirty strangers so much.
>>2 Hey Snowden: stay out of Iceland and learn how to mind your own business. When you have to run to the bathroom repeatedly due to leaks, then you clearly have a problem.
>>1
Either pay the money, or offer another method of payment. He did a service that the locked could have done himself. As an added bonus, the locksmith could remove the ad, and blacklist his number and address, and everyone live happily ever after.
Name:
Anonymous2013-08-14 13:53
Grand Pimp Tarkin?
Name:
Anonymous2013-08-14 15:23
Alex Jones scares me. When he appeared on the Piers Morgan show, he didn’t have his facts straight, and he capered like a buffoon in an attempt to hide his ignorance. He behaved like a bully.
He’d be more at home in a white trash trailer park than the green room.
He talks all over guests and hosts alike, doesn’t let anyone get a word in edgeways, and is, frankly, rude. He will never go down well on British television.
The "Zionists" aren't Jewish. They would never step foot in the properties that they have developed. The conflicts they stir up are all just professional trolls. No sane human being would be against a New World Order that builds a utopia everyone loves.
Protesters carrying signs calling for Judge Baugh's resignation on the courthouse lawn on Thursday.
BILLINGS (Montana) - The mother of a teenage rape victim says that a judge is "just covering his butt" after he apologised for saying that her 14-yearold daughter who eventually killed herself was "older than her chronological age".
Ms Auliea Hanlon said that District Judge G. Todd Baugh's apology was "irrelevant" because he has stood by the 30-day prison sentence given on Monday to rapist and former teacher Stacey Rambold, 54.
Her daughter, Cherice Moralez, killed hereslf before Rambold's case came to trial.
Ms Hanlon rejected the judge's apology on Thursday as she spoke to an Associated Press reporter during an rally for Judge Baugh's resignation. The rally packed the Yellowstone Country Courthouse lawn with hundreds of people, may carrying signs such as "Justice for Cherice" and "14 is 14".
On Wednesday, Judge Baugh, 71 wrote an apology in a letter to the editor to The Billings Gazette, saying he "deserved to be chastised" for his comments about the victim, who he had said was "older than her chronological age" and had as much control of the situation as the high school teacher who was in a sexual relationship with her.
The judge later told reporters he was "fumbling around" in court trying to explain his sentence and "made some really stupid remarks".
But he said he stood by his decision to sentence Rambold to 30 days in jail - 15 years in prison, with all but 31 days of that term suspended. He gave Rambold credit for one day already served.
"She wasn't even old enough to get a driver's licence. But Judge Baugh, who never met our daughter, justified the paltry sentence saying she was older than her chronological age," Ms Hanlon said in a statement to the Gazette after Monday's sentencing. "I guess somehow it makes a rape more acceptable if you blame the victim, even if she was only 14."
Defence lawyer may lose licence over gang-rape remarks
He may also face contempt suit for Delhi court outburst
NEW DELHI - A lawyer for two men sentenced to death for the fatal gang-rape of an Indian student could lose his licence for remarks that "reek of misogyny", a regulatory body said.
Mr A.P. Singh, the counsel for Akshay Thakur and Vinay Sharma, has angered the Bar Council of Delhi with his outbursts after death sentences were passed last Friday on four men for the assault on the 23-year-old woman in New Delhi last year.
Mr Singh told a section of the local media that he would have "burned my daughter alive" if she was having "premarital sex and moving around at night with her boyfriend".
He was apparently referring to the victim, who died of grievous internal injuries after being lured onto a private bus by a gang of six following a cinema trip with her male companion on Dec 16.
The only allegations against the character of the victim have been made by some of the defence lawyers, who have produced no evidence.
The Bar Council said yesterday that Mr Singh's comments amounted to "professional misconduct" and that it would consider cancelling his license at a meeting tomorrow.
"How can he say anything like this? His comments reek of misogyny," said Mr Surya Prakash Khatri, chairman of the council.
"We can go to any extent. We can cancel his practice permit," he added.
Mr Singh could also face a separate "contempt suit" for questioning the death sentence and shouting at the judge inside the courtroom, said Mr Khatri.
"This is injustice! This is not a victory of truth. You have acted under political pressure," Mr Singh shouted after the sentence was read out.
Mr Khatri said Mr Singh had to explain on what basis he had made the "damaging allegations" against the judge.
The Hindustan Times yesterday quoted Mr Singh as saying that he stood by his remarks.
"I stand by all my statements made inside and outside the court. I will not apologise. Let the notices come, I will file my reply," he told the newspaper.
Mr Singh, as well as the lawyers for the other convicts, have said that they would appeal against the convictions in the Delhi High Court.
The attack, in which the student was repeatedly raped and assaulted with a metal rod, sparked widespread anger at the treatment of women in India.
The fifth suspect in the case, bus driver Ram Singh, died in prison in March in an apparent suicide.
A sixth member of the gang, who was a minor at the time of the assault, was sentenced last month to three years in a reformatory, the maximum penalty allowed under India's laws.