Boy are there some nice people in Utah

The victim of brutal torture by gang of six roommates who 'tied him up, stapled his lips shut and cut him with power tool' in basement of their home

   * Group of men and women aged 20-55 carried out attack in Utah
   * Victim Thomas Chapman, 41, had moved into home 10 days ago
   * Chapman fled to his relative's house and remains in hospital

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2148332/Thomas-Chapman-tortured-roommates-Magna-Utah.html

>>1
suspects were reportedly suspicious about Chapman, 41, who only moved into the house in Magna, near Salt Lake City, 11 days ago.
Harvard professor of political science Robert D. Putnam conducted a nearly decade long study how multiculturalism affects social trust. He surveyed 26,200 people in 40 American communities, finding that when the data were adjusted for class, income and other factors, the more racially diverse a community is, the greater the loss of trust. People in diverse communities "don’t trust the local mayor, they don’t trust the local paper, they don’t trust other people and they don’t trust institutions," writes Putnam. In the presence of such ethnic diversity, Putnam maintains that: We hunker down. We act like turtles. The effect of diversity is worse than had been imagined. And it’s not just that we don’t trust people who are not like us. In diverse communities, we don’t trust people who do look like us.

>>2
Would you trust a bunch of hill billies and racists who become aggressive towards any community that isn't their own? There's your problem.

>>3
What if racism is mutual? Can you force one group to love the other? What if racism helps to consolidate power and take over businesses?

for example,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corporate_raid

fwt

>>2
A good example from USSR: soviets had state paid free education. Alas there is nothing "free" and when the Jews (most of whom had university degrees) wanted to mass emigrate to Israel, USSR requested them to pay for their education, which led to U.S. trade embargo on USSR (Jackson-Vanik amendment). It's funny how U.S. defended thieves, who stolen people's money in the form of education. After that, USSR set quotes on the Jews in universities. I.e. all Jews are traitors and emigrants, so there is no reason to educate them.

>>2

I don't know if it's race so much as culture.  When everyone believes the same things i.e. rape is bad, gay is bad, don't steal, don't kill, the it's easy to build a relation on trust.  When the guy next to you is not of your culture and not of your heritage, you don't trust them because you don't have the same basic ideals.  Hence bosnis/serbia -- a nation of nearly homogenius people who killed the fuck out of each other over religion and culture.

>>7
What about Yakuza and Triads?

>>6
You state it was free. Then you call it stealing. Make up your mind, lol!

>>9
Which part of "state paid" don't you understand?

>>10
I understand that it doesn't mean stealing. Where do you think the government got that money? Did they sign a contract to reimburse the government if they gave up their citizenship? Why are Jews the only people on earth being judged by this rather unique interpretation of stealing that wouldn't hold up in any real court of law. A communist government can do anything it wants with the resources and people it owns. They didn't have a say in it.

I received a free education from my country.  If I renounce my citizenship, I don't pay a dime for anything it did for me.

>>11
Highly trained scientists from socialist universities are not strategically and financially worth the same as liberal arts majors. I'll agree with you, the latter group is not worth a kopeck.