Obvious shit

Why is it that so many people deny raw facts?

The holocaust happened
Ron Paul isn't going to win
We have too many people in prison
The free market needs regulations
Guns are dangerous and should be banned
A woman should be able to have an abortion
Free healthcare has worked for France
Iran getting a nuclear bomb would be dangerous
Prostitution is harmful to women

0/10

No one is this stupid.

The holocaust happened
Debatable. Most of the mainstream testimonies have a lot of absurdities in them. (See: Wiernik's absurd report of corpses being incinerated for mere minutes when modern incinerators take up to 7 hours for a single corpse)
Ron Paul isn't going to win
True
We have too many people in prison
Also true
The free market needs regulations
It's pretty good at regulating itself. You don't need a government to do that for you.
Guns are dangerous and should be banned
By the same logic, cars should also be banned.
A woman should be able to have an abortion
If it's not at the expense of other tax payers, sure.
Free healthcare has worked for France
No such thing as "free" health care. Doctors have to be paid salaries.
Iran getting a nuclear bomb would be dangerous
Iran has allowed the IAEA to inspect its nuclear facilities. Israel hasn't.
Prostitution is harmful to women
If a grown adult woman wants to sell her services, who are we to deny her freedom?

NEXT!

Yeah the market is so good at regulating itself that's why the financial goons in America tanked the world economy through fraud, amirite?

Because cars are designed for killing so they should be categorized the same logically, amirite? Though honestly cars should be banned, at the very least propellant based modes of transport SHOULD be banned. Our planet and species are absolutely fucked otherwise though not implying we aren't already irreversibly fucked from emissions.

>>4
The Wall Street bailouts and other financial frauds involving COLLECTIVISED losses would not have happened if the government wasn't large enough to make YOU pay for Wall Street's failures.

If Wall Street competed fairly in an unregulated market environment, it would have bankrupted without YOU having to pay for their bailout.

>>5
A government that is a) competent and b) not corrupt, would have recognized the scam for what it was, and put its foot down so hard it would measure on the Richter Scale.

It would then have used its means intelligently; say, buying up the important bits of industry etc in the resulting bankruptcy sales, gone through the books thoroughly for any dotted t's an crossed i's, to use as evidence in resulting trials. There's been swindling going on; by definition, that means there's culprits to be found.


But no, let's not have people that are _both_ competent _and_ non-corrupt anywhere near government, shall we?
Intelligent government? Who needs that?


>>3
No such thing as "free" health care. Doctors have to be paid salaries.
Over here, taxation doubles as health insurance. You get sick, you have an "insurance company" that does _not_ first spend silly resources trumping up excuses for not helping you. You get the help you need, no questions asked. Except "where does it hurt"…

("Over here" isn't France, however. Here, our dear leaders are going way too far the other way, and seem to find it a good idea to have people stuck in queues for years. And don't you _dare_ try private hospitals, that's "jumping the queue" or something. And don't you dare mention that those _behind_ you in line now get one step closer to that elusive hospital bed.)

>>6
a) competent and b) not corrupt
Oops, forgot something. May well go without saying, but…
not to mention c) not retarded

>>5
The shareholders and working executives should've paid for the bailout, there's no reason why they shouldn't have. But the consistent unbroken string of deregulation stemming from Reagan is what enabled the fraud to take place. The market cannot go unregulated, in order to ensure such fraud doesn't happen in the first place.

>>3
>By the same logic, cars should also be banned.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-17590859

Notice how America has regular school shootings and a complete lack of school carmageddons?

>Guns should be banned because if they are illegal then criminals won't be able to get them
>Guns should be banned because if they are suicide rates would go down

Oh wait neither are true if you banned guns they would just be trafficked harder and suicide by other methods would go up, as seen in Europe

The holocaust happened
Stop denying - let us celebrate the defeat of 6,000,000 ZOG occupants! Let the Holocaust be our "Purim". That was a big win, but also a big lose - there are still many Jews occupying our countries and ruining our daily life.

>>10
No one mentioned gun control as a way of curbing suicide and gun control makes it significantly harder for a criminal to get a firearm. If you want to use Europe as an example then go compare crimes rates involving firearms with that of countries in the EU and America.

>>12
Gun control has nothing to do with crime rates. Government disallows guns to protect itself. A crowd with molotov-cocktails is one thing, but a crowd with machine-guns couldn't be stopped that easily, especially if it's organized.

>>13
Yeah, bro. Gun control is just THE MAN trying to keep you down! Row row fight the powah.

>>14
When you've nothing to lose, you can kill the Jews, like the French Hero did to avenge his Arabian brothers.

http://www.worldsfamousphotos.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/07/410px-einsatzgruppen_killing.jpg

That is why the Jews fear armed men.

>>15
Hey, maybe you can emulate your favourite French murderer and jump out of a window. In fact, I hope your brain washer leader makes that compulsory.

>>17
Nope. What we really need is a revolt and mass killing of the Jews, then a nuclear strike on Israel.

>>18
During the communism, the Jews killed 50 million Russians. That means to avenge our brothers, we should exterminate 50 million Jews. Oops! That means all the Jews!

>>19
I'm still interested to hear to explain how you think Lenin was Jewish. It really does boggle the mind.

>>20
Lenin's mother was Jewish, while his father was turkic. Lenin himself was fluent in Yiddish.

Also the Jews assassinated a good amount of Russian Emperors: Peter II, Pavel I, Alexander I, Alexander II, Nicholas II, and, probably, Empress Catherine II.

ALEXANDER I. "MYSTERIOUSLY" POISONED
Let us continue the Rappoport's statements
"Alexander showed the same respect toward Catholicism as toward Orthodoxy
". "He held that their fundamental principles were one and the same".
Only through the efforts of Satan's agents has the Church remained
disunited .
"He mingled with Christians, Moslems and Jews!" (p . 395) .
"He lunched at the Synagogue of the Jews and returned to Taganrog
mysteriously ill ." "He now learned of the existence of a
conspiracy to assassinate him" (p . 396) .
He called out to his doctor, Sir James Wylies
"Oh! my friend! What monsters, what ungrateful wretches! And I did
so genuinely desire their welfare!"
He was poisoned by the famous Aqua Tofana, but the illness
was declared to be typhoid fever, because of the fear that his people
might organize wholesale pogroms against the Jews .

http://www.thewebcomiclist.com/o/8538

>>21
And Stalin and Chairman Mao? Do go on.

>>23
Stalin was Turkic, Slavs call Stalin "churka" - i.e. an ethnic slur similar to nigger (http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=churka). Mao was a Jewish agent. There was a big Jewish community in China. Also, please, research who funded Chinese revolution.

>>24
>Also, please, research who funded Chinese revolution.
Why don't you just say is was secret Jewish commie-anarchist-capitalist-muslim-christian-niggers? As if you're seriously inviting anyone to scrutinize your baseless bullshit.

Not when you blame everything bad to ever happen on Jews, even if anyone involved couldn't possibly be Jewish they just happen to turn out to be SeCeReT JeWiSh AgEnTs!~

>>25
The US government, specifically the Rosenfelt Administration, funneled vast amounts of money, arms, and intelligence to Mao until 1945 and beyond.  This even though Mao was always more interested in attacking the Kuomintang than the Japanese.  Chiang Kai-Shek had to fight both the Japanese and the Communists, and he did this with rather less support from the West than Mao got.

>>26
You meant Roosevelt because that was his name, not the misspelling the Nazis used as "proof" his distant ancestor might have been Jewish. Not surprising that you would repeat propaganda made up by the Nazis though.

>>25
Why don't you just say is was secret Jewish commie-anarchist-capitalist-muslim-christian-niggers?
I'm saying exactly that. Simple folk don't want muslims, niggers or commies inside their countries. Such decisions are done by the Liberals in the Government. And a Liberal is a synonym for a Freemason. Neither our pagan ancestors wanted Christianity/Islam/Communism - we were forced to convert into these serfdoms with government's blessing.

http://foster.20megsfree.com/439.htm
Supposed 'historical inevitability' as a weapon of political language has been filched from communism and creeps into every liberal initiative. It is used, for example, to forward the EU superstate project.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Motto_of_the_European_Union
United in diversity is the official motto (in the English language) of the European Union (EU).

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soviet_Union_state_motto
The Soviet Union state motto is a quotation from Karl Marx's and Friedrich Engels' Communist Manifesto, meaning Workers of the world, unite!.

http://www.pinoyfraternity.com/index.php?showtopic=1130
Freemasonic Motto Liberty, Equality, Fraternity

If that isn't a conspiracy then I don't know what is a conspiracy. Former USSR people have pure hatred against this Jewish "Liberty, Equality, Brotherhood" slogan.

>>28
I notice how you've backed off the Roosevelt thing and returned to the generic JEWS JEW JEWS line but I'm come to expect this, since this is what happens EVERY TIME I point out the problem with one of your unsubstantiated claims that has no evidence to support it.

>Simple folk don't want muslims, niggers or commies inside their countries.
This is somewhat debatable since Islam is the largest religion in the world, so you either have to believe that "simple folk" do want Muslims in their country or that Islam is a religion for scholars and gentleman only.

>>30
Oh lol, this is why I keep on replying to your nonsense, for gems like this. Organisations value NOT hating people based on arbitrary qualities such as race, religion or disability = SeCrEt JeWiSh CoNsPiRaCy!~ Damn those Jews for oppressing us with ideas of freedom, liberty and justice for all! Fuckin' hilarious.

>>31
returned to the generic JEWS JEW JEWS
So, who are the liberals? Who funds them?

Organisations value NOT hating people based on arbitrary qualities such as race, religion or disability
race, religion or disability aren't arbitrary qualities. True nationalists dislike working for anyone but their brothers with compatible DNA and ideology. And there is nothing wrong with hating circumcised jew-muslims. But Soviet Union Jews even forced people into intermarriage, producing genetic garbage offsprings, just like it transferred population like a cattle, without consent, where it wanted to do work.

Thanks to the internationalist Jews, today Russia could only be healed by mandatory DNA test, with extermination of anyone outside haplogroup R1a1a7 group.

จะเอาอะไรกันนักกันหนา

>>32
I.e. every nation should do DNA cleansing. Any politician, refusing ethnic cleansing, should be considered as a Jewish agent and a traitor of his nation. Everyone knows that only the Jews support multiculturalism.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wr0PWeXp1gI

In a near future a virus could be developed to cleanse the niggers.

>>32
>So, who are the liberals? Who funds them?
Is this is a serious question? Anyone who chooses to identify themselves as belonging to a liberal political philosophy. How long is a piece of string, fuckass?

>True nationalists dislike working for anyone but their brothers with compatible DNA and ideology
And this is why nationalists are retarded, they actually think there is such as thing as "compatible DNA". And I've already explained why genetic "purity" is a total joke.

So do simple folk want muslims in their country or are all muslims scholars? You forgot to answer that one. Good thing I'm here to remind you!

>>32
This is funny because you don't seem to realize the republican party funnels more money into the pockets of jews and israel harder than the democratic party ever has and the republican party is staunchly anti-liberal. In fact if there was no ``Grand'' old party all of a sudden, israel would fall within a year or sooner. Though it would be very messy with their nukes and biochem, and the batshit nazi-esque zionist mentality.

Jerusalem would become the barren wasteland that it was touted to be (but actually wasn't) prior to the invasion of palestine.

bump for quality

sage for spam

>>39
lol @ sage