>Announcing it's "not her lucky day," a federal judge in Washington, D.C., has told an eligibility attorney he has dismissed her case demanding information from the Social Security Administration regarding President Obama's Social Security Number, sought because of suspicions it may be fraudulent.
Why do republicans keep hiring her if she cant even win one case in a 3 year period?
Name:
Anonymous2011-09-10 9:45
>Still arguing over Obama's birthplace
>2011
Name:
Anonymous2011-09-10 10:06
If actually winning the lawsuits was the whole point, then being slapped with a "piracy" lawsuit by the MAFIAA wouldn't sound so scary to most people. Then paying up would have been a sign of actual guilt, rather than meaning they're not economically strong enough to prove their innocence without, in the process, risking economic ruin for having committed the heinous felony of being innocent.
Rather it's the tactics of keeping people tied up in endless court cases, no matter how blatantly artificial the case. In the MAFIAA's case, it's extorting money from innocent bystanders on a protection-money-like base (hence the nickname "MAFIAA"), in politics it's so as to score cheap political points by endlessly harassing their opponent with court cases and the like.
The logic seems to be the ability to say "why bother with the justice system if there's nothing to it". As such, it's a version of the Big Lie; the more authority someone claims, the more of that authority they'd have to lose if caught in a blatant lie. And so (the dumb part of) the people will be thinking that "if _they_ keep saying it, then there must be something to it".
tl;dr: It's a way of preying on people's stupidity and ignorance to score some cheap political point.
But who is scoring the point? Obama? Or GOP/Tea Party?
Name:
Anonymous2011-09-10 10:54
Isn't Taitz a jewish name? How did she lose?
Name:
Anonymous2011-09-10 11:52
>he has dismissed her case
So. Judge dismisses her case because constitution is irrelevant, sounds good lol, those silly republicans who do they think they are, if obama doesn't want to provide his birth certificate, that's his choice! After all, government is our rulers, not our servants! >>3
If it was a "cheap political point" then obongo would provide evidence contradicting it.
You'll notice ALL HIS RECORDS ARE FUCKING SEALED UP COMPLETELY! Why? Because he's not an american citizen, he got money to go to college from communists, and his marks were fucking terrible.
>>6
>If it was a "cheap political point" then obongo would provide evidence contradicting it.
He has done, repeatedly. The only evidence that's been produced to suggest that he was born in Kenya turned out to be forged. Then, when the forger came forward and said "y'all got punk'd" providing photos of everything that they used to produce the document, the dumb fucks claimed that those photos were shooped.
>>8 The only evidence that's been produced to suggest that he was born in Kenya turned out to be forged.
Sorry, wrong. A female family member made the claim that Obama was born in Kenya. That's not a male, and that's not a document.
If you can't get your facts right, why are you posting here?
The fact is that there's enough evidence to merit investigation into Obama's nativity. However, such an investigation is likely to go nowhere, since the State of Hawaii has claimed that his birth certificate there is authentic. It will be almost impossible to overturn that document with a few verbal claims by family members.
Name:
Anonymous2011-09-10 16:14
>>10
>A female family member made the claim that Obama was born in Kenya.
[citation needed]
>the State of Hawaii has claimed that his birth certificate there is authentic
Color me cynical, but that to me suggests that it might actually be genuine.
Name:
Anonymous2011-09-10 17:21
>>10 Has a point. The word of a woman isn't exactly evidence.
>>15
Neither is simply asserting the same thing over and over.
So, in summary:
- he was born in Hawaii
- his grandmother in Kenya says she was there in Hawaii when he was born
- his birth certificate says he was born in Hawaii
- his birth was announced contemporaneously in the local BM&D columns in Hawaii
- the requirements for the necessary cover-up to the contrary are so ridiculous as to be unbelievable on their face (extraordinary claims, etc.)
That said, none of this changes the issue of his religion, being the filthy stinking Christnigger that he is.
But honestly, if you're going to make hard claims, give a hard source. No, it is NOT our responsibility to look it up you lazy fuck, it's yours for making the claim in the first place, learn how to debate.
Name:
Anonymous2011-09-10 23:00
If at first you don't succeed, try, try again. Preferably in another state, so they can't declare you vexatious.
Name:
Anonymous2011-09-11 12:36
>>16
You claim all these things yet there is no proof, and then you suggest no conspiracy could possibly exist because "how could they keep it a secret" ??
Name:
Anonymous2011-09-11 13:39
>>19
>there is no proof
apart from everything that's been discussed and linked to in this thread, dumbass. Most of the evidence could be disputed - after all, a birth certificate can be forged (see the "Coast Province" forgery), and maybe the grandmother was lying when she said she was in Hawaii, or maybe her interpreter deliberately mistranslated. That leaves the birth announcements in 1961. We know that there was the means to insert these, and we know the Obamas had the opportunity to do so while the mother was living in Hawaii. That leaves the question of motive - why, in 1961, would someone insert a false birth announcement into the newspaper for him? They couldn't have known that 50 years on he'd be president, and it is only eligibility for the office of president (and VP via the 12th) that actually requires a "natural born citizen", a term which isn't defined, but could be argued to mean citizenship by birth rather than naturalization. As for getting him citizenship in the first place, because his mother was an American citizen, and had lived in the US for at least five years, baby Barry would have been born a US citizen regardless of where he was born. So what's the movie for planting false information in the newspaper in 1961?
Name:
Anonymous2011-09-11 19:26
Orly Taitz is a patriot. Her continued refusal to accept the fact that Obama was born in Hawaii is helping to pay down the national debt with all those thousands of dollars in court filing fees.
Name:
Anonymous2011-09-11 19:54
I think Obama's father is a story in itself. He was a creepy Muslim communist that was kick out for wanting to impregnate white women. Then, he abandoned his wife and son. After which, a communist terrorist helped write the book about it in a positive light.
The birth certificate is a more or less a prop for liberals that drag it out when they can't win any of real issues.
Name:
Anonymous2011-09-12 7:15
>>22
>The birth certificate is a more or less a prop for liberals that drag it out when they can't win any of real issues.
And you dumb republifucks grab onto it every time.
Name:
Anonymous2011-09-12 11:32
>>23
Which leaves the liberals dumbfounded when they have to address the real issues.
Your crutch might help you walk, but this is going to be a foot race in 2012. :)
E-Verify says Obama not eligible for employment in the United States
>E-Verify is an Internet-based system operated by U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) in partnership with the Social Security Administration (SSA). E-Verify is currently free to employers and is available in all 50 states. E-Verify provides an automated link to federal databases to help employers determine employment eligibility of new hires and the validity of their Social Security numbers.
If you were an employer and entered Barack Hussein Obama’s social security number 042-68-4425 into the data base to verify that he was eligible for employment in the United States you could not legally hire him.
Liberals, how could the president fail a simple e-verify test unless there is something seriously wrong with his SSN? What is he hiding?
If you have evidence to refute the claims, then by all means step forward with it. Dismissing it out of hand because it's not a source you agree with is childish.
Name:
Anonymous2011-09-13 2:24
>>26
E-verify, a legitimate business, infallibly proves Obama is a Kenyan manchurian candidate who wants to turn the US into a communist dictatorship.
Why do you hate facts and logic so much?
Name:
Anonymous2011-09-13 6:13
>>28
You missed out the words "Some loony wingnut claims, unverifiably, that" from the beginning of that post.
Name:
Anonymous2011-09-13 6:27
>>25
Must be a glitch. Because his mother was American, he would be an American citizen regardless of where he was born.
That said, it might be an anti-fraud measure. The reason for rejection isn't that the SSN is invalid or that citizenship could not be verified. It's a generic failure message, which I suppose is there to make sure that some foreign-looking fellow doesn't come up to an unknowing employer claiming to be "Barack Obama" using that SSN - I have no idea how common that name might be among Muslim, but halfway around the world I've certainly met people called George Bush, William Clinton and James Carter.
Name:
Anonymous2011-09-13 6:32
>>27
How about instead dismissing it out of hand because it's a source with an agenda to push? That's entirely legitimate, it's sometimes called the Rice-Davies principle.
>>34
Seriously? You faggots have been at this cause for years now and haven't made any progress.
Name:
Anonymous2011-09-13 21:48
More like barely trying. We'll just take over America and ignore the strawman issues you obsess over. It's becoming self evident that liberalism is a cancerous ideology hellbent on destroying our proud nation.
Enjoy the diseased blankets we give you when you get sent to the reservations.
Name:
Anonymous2011-09-14 10:05
>>34
Don't forget the "original rilly rilly valid rilly rilly true birf certificate and we rilly rilly mean it dis time" that a couple of interns spent twenty minutes slapping together in Adobe Acrobat.
Name:
Anonymous2011-09-14 16:08
>>33
It may be that he's not eligible to work while in office - after all, the President is expected to be loyal to the country and to put that duty above all else, so having a part-time job on the side presents a conflict of interest.
Has anyone tried running the details of any former Presidents through it? What about current Senators? Try that filthy fucker Rubio.
Name:
Anonymous2011-09-14 20:26
None of this is relevant!
Obama claims to have been born in Hawaii in 1961 but...