Orly Taitz loses another lawsuit

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=339629

>Announcing it's "not her lucky day," a federal judge in Washington, D.C., has told an eligibility attorney he has dismissed her case demanding information from the Social Security Administration regarding President Obama's Social Security Number, sought because of suspicions it may be fraudulent.

Why do republicans keep hiring her if she cant even win one case in a 3 year period?

If actually winning the lawsuits was the whole point, then being slapped with a "piracy" lawsuit by the MAFIAA wouldn't sound so scary to most people. Then paying up would have been a sign of actual guilt, rather than meaning they're not economically strong enough to prove their innocence without, in the process, risking economic ruin for having committed the heinous felony of being innocent.

Rather it's the tactics of keeping people tied up in endless court cases, no matter how blatantly artificial the case. In the MAFIAA's case, it's extorting money from innocent bystanders on a protection-money-like base (hence the nickname "MAFIAA"), in politics it's so as to score cheap political points by endlessly harassing their opponent with court cases and the like.

The logic seems to be the ability to say "why bother with the justice system if there's nothing to it". As such, it's a version of the Big Lie; the more authority someone claims, the more of that authority they'd have to lose if caught in a blatant lie. And so (the dumb part of) the people will be thinking that "if _they_ keep saying it, then there must be something to it".


tl;dr:  It's a way of preying on people's stupidity and ignorance to score some cheap political point.