A non Racist White is an Oxymoron

Some random whore on why whites are being racist by not being racist.
http://www.assatashakur.org/forum/breaking-down-understanding-our-enemies/12116-white-anti-racist-oxymoron-open-letter-white-anti-racists.html
Discuss.

You know, that post could have just contained the phrase "liberation theology" and it'd save a few whole turns around the color wheel.

This is a really old thread.

She is a bitch.

>>2

Well, true.  I think she does have a very valid point, though the door actually swings both ways.  Multiculturalism destroys both of our societies.  For blacks, integration means that they never had a real chance to build up thier own support structures -- they're essentially living on a reservation in the cities working for white owned businesses and shopping at other white owned businesses.  No people has ever built up wealth that way. 

For whites, it's a bit different.  Some of us do make some moeny at the expense of blacks, but on the other hand, we're losing our culture to pop culture and hiphop and rap.  the "racist" card is being played very often to make us afraid to stand up for our own interests.

I won't say that blacks and whites can't come together on some things, but I don't think it works long term to pretend that race and racism doesn't exist on both sides.  We can't even deal honestly with actual racism because saying racism exists or doesn't exist will piss off too many people.

Personally, I think mankind was meant to be basicly tribal, and that people can't get power without their own country.  I suppose in that sense I agree. 

In pacem deorum, Caeia

>>4

I think I largely agree.

I will elaborate on one of your statements to be a pedantic infallible asshole though.

Mankind shows tribal instincts that dictate group think mentality between 'domains', like race. This can largely be broken down through conscious conditioning but it is typical in the most modernized human racially and culturally to be racially biased.

Saying they were 'meant to be' dictates they had purpose or a creator, when there is no evidence of this.

>>5

Well, evolution has largely dictated our sociail structure for almost 1 million years, and it's going to be difficult to override the "tribal instict", in fact it's probably impossible.  You can't train people to "break down" their tribal instinct anymore than you could break down the stalking and hunting instinct in cats.  You might suppress it, but it's always there -- the cat will pounce on birds and bring them to you any chance he gets.  You can't "retrain" nature.  Nature is nature -- and it doesn't change just because humans decide that it should change.

It's better to work with nature rather than against it.  If humans are by nature tribal, than the best result is that we work to establish good inter-tribal relations between Africans and Europeans, between Arabs and Jews, and so on.  Recognizing what is there, but provide a framework for cooperation, rather than trying to force humans into a new type of society that their brains aren't equiped for. 

That's all.

WELL IF THEY DON'T LIKE WHITE PEOPLE, PLEASE RETURN BACK TO YOUR AFRICAN CITES, WE NEVER ASK FOR YOU TO COME TO OUR COUNTRY AND TURN THE MAJOR CITES INTO YOUR AFRICAN GHETTOS, YOUR BLACK KIDS MURDERING AND RAPING, THE AMERICAN AFRICAN PEOPLE ARE NOTHING BUT SCUM, JUST KEEP ON TAKING AND NEVER GIVING BACK.

>>5 "conscious conditioning" = brainwashing by the Jewsmedia

And yet it doesn't really ever wholly work.  All the "antifa" and "anti-racist" people who whine the loudest whenever someone like me speaks a truth they don't want to hear, are the ones who are the most cautious about counting the nigger-to-human ratio through the glass before they go into the 7-11, and they invariably send their kids to the whitest private schools they can afford.

>>1
Too long, didn't read.
...or rather, too fucking long, read about halfway, she never got to the fucking point and just ranted nonsense (and I'm not surprised at all), so I stopped. This just had to be a troll posting on a troll board. I would have liked to arrive at the actual trolling, but like I said, it was just a nonsense rant.

A Oxymoron is a black person wearing a suit!

The big surprise is that the whole fucking mess was written by a Asian woman.
Really keep reading.

OH SHIT!

Those fucking gooked out chinks..

haha joking, I like Asians.

The sites is Storm Front for blacks

>>13

And the problem with that is...

Seriously, I think it's only natural that blacks would stand up for themselves in the same ways that whites do.  Whites aren't racist for wanting the best for whites, and blacks aren't racist for wanting the best for blacks.  It's only the insane and the liberal who insist that race doesn't exist -- race exists.

We're all racist in that we quite naturally want what's best for our kind.  We all think our shit is cool, and we all want to have the right as a people to self-determination.  The only difficulty in America is that we share a single nation, so we have to organize and negotiate.  I want a NAAWP that can negotiate and lobby as well as the NAACP.  They need a Stormfront because it's a way to raise black consciousness to black issues so that they get addressed.

Totally agree with >>14... (words :P)

I think that there are legitimate cultural stigma and subtle provocations that affect all races and promote an insurgency like WN / Black panther / Dragon society / Zionists ETC. Internally they are very often exaggerated though

I believe that from their own perspective, all of these kinds of groups are primarily looking out for their peoples integrity rather than trying to destroy another peoples (Possibly excluding Zionists but they have religious links and all western religions have been shown to push cultural boundaries heavily!) I agree with a Tribalism in that perspective, you take care of your own if anyone tries to mess with them!

>>1

Interesting...

An "Asian-American" that sounds like a deranged Negress:
http://www.nathanielturner.com/towhitewomenwhothink.htm

And changes "her" name:
http://adriennecareyhurley.blogspot.com/2007/04/tamara-nopper-kil-ja-kim-on-virginia.html

[...]

KIKENVERMIN ALERT

>>16

And no picture to be found anywhere...
http://asam.sas.upenn.edu/people/nopper
LOL

Angelina Jolie is racist too!
http://community.livejournal.com/debunkingwhite/360077.html?thread=6047885
Great, we can't stop adopting niglets to appease the jews =)
What a relief.

>>18

*can  :p

What's an Oxy?

Is it something that looks like one of the Wurzels?

raid anyone?

go for it >>22

Make them fear the mudkips!

text 2 to 55171

text 2 to 55171

I'm convinced leftists are more racist than rightists now.

>>26

They aren't all that leftist.  Just anti-white.

>>27
In the 21st Century that's a distinction without a difference.

>>27
It's just a personal observation, and I don't know how it pans out nationally, but most respectable people on the right that I've been exposed to don't really care about race and try to view people as people and issues as issues.

>>28

No it's not.  The point is that it's ALL about the race.  I know some racists who are downright conservative, and some nonracists who are communists.  The difference is focus -- if I'm concerned about economic issues, I'm leftist.  If I'm concerned about race issues, I'm racist.  They aren't the same thing.

Of course they are, >>30.  "Socialism" in the US today is all about taking money away from productive working-class White men and shoveling it down the bottomless throats of nigger and wetback useless eaters who breed like bacteria and reward their benefactors by shuffling into the voting booth every four years to pull the big lever with the big "D" on it, legally or otherwise.

"The Browning of America," i.e., the ongoing marginalization, disenfranchisement, and eventual extermination and replacement of those inconvenient, uppity Whites with half a billion coffee-colored humanoids with the minds of rats, is the wet dream of Obama and his party.  They are bold enough and fearless enough to speak of it openly.

It all ties together, it's all the same arguments and the same methodology, and it's all about replacing Whitey with Third World savages who are easily conditioned to vote for whoever offers them a bigger welfare check.  The fact that this road leads inevitably to Zimbabwe, when we run out of productive White taxpayers to carry all the niggers on their backs, is an ineluctable historical fact which those who push this agenda either haven't thought through or are actively trying to bring about.  Modern "liberalism" has always been nihilistic at its core.  It's an ideology that hasn't changed since the Caitiline Conspiracy tried to overthrow the legally constituted Senate of Rome in order to seize the holdings of wealthy landowners and use them to buy the loyalty of poor, downtrodden foreigners.  It has always destroyed every society that allowed it to gain hold, and in its wake the very earth itself turns black, nothing is left but dust and darkness.

>>31

As though whites are the only productive people.  There is a sizeable black middle class, as well as black college graduates.  Stormfag doesn't like to talk about those black people.  They also don't like to mention that India has more college graduates than we do. 

also

>Caitiline Conspiracy

Am I supposed to be impressed that you can fucking google some obscure ancient history.  Rome fell because of the laziness of the so-called productive.  They became for the most part what channers would call NEETs -- a gigantic leasure class that did nothing but buy luxuries and sit on their rumps navel gazing and philosophizing. 

PS at the time of the Roman Republic, there were very few Blacks and no Wetbacks.  LERN 2 HISTORY, bro.

hilarious

I'm so glad to see my tread has grown.
I don't have much to say on this besides can't we all just get along.

>>32
The so-called "black middle class" and "black college graduates" you mention never existed before the intervention of the State.  On their own merits they could not have risen; their positions now are in effect stolen from working-class Whites who got higher scores on the entrance tests, yet were denied a chance to enter the middle class because of the State's policy of "affirmative action," which is yet another form of welfare check, yet another sop to the niggers to buy their loyalty.

Of course India has more college graduates than we do; they have four times our population, and the billionaire Jew plutocrats who control the US economy have found it extremely profitable to train foreigners to take our jobs at a fraction of our wages.  But what does this have to do with the points I raised, good sir?

Your interpretation of Rome's decay and fall is fascinating, and is one I've never seen before, not even in Gibbon, so I suppose you must be a historian.  Would you care to expound on these ideas, and tell me where I can find source material to support your position?  I had been under the impression that it had far more to do with a two-century-long invasion by foreign barbarians who did not share Roman language or culture, and the replacement of vigorous Roman patriotism with the fatalistic, nihilistic madness of the Christ-cultists, who cared not at all for the state of the society in which they lived and would not defend their way of life.

>>35  <--- Black person.

>>35

Affrimative action might get you into college, but it doesn't mean that you won't flunk out in 6 months. So even if the slot was initially given to blacks, they still managed to do the homework and pass the tests. 

>Christ-cultists

Butthurt atheist detected.

>>37
It does if the Dean is leaning on all the professors in your department with orders to increase the number of niggers allowed to graduate.  Niggers quite frequently don't even have to show up.  "Objective standards are RACIST!"  "We're demonstrating our committment to diversity by giving a free ride and a free diploma to Rastus here, who can't even read the big words on it."

Have you ever been to a college?  Maybe gotten saddled with tutoring illiterate niggers in EFL (English as a First Language) as part of your work-study?

Also, would you allow a nigger "doctor," medical school "diploma" or not, to care for a family member of yours?  Answer truthfully.  If a relative of mine falls ill, I want the doctor treating him to be the one who got into med school and graduated on his own merits, not the illiterate nigger who got a free ride.

Here's a case study on one such nigger "doctor."  http://aad.english.ucsb.edu/docs/mmjennings.html

p.s.  Still waiting for you to expound on why Rome fell, since you appear to be claiming to know more than Gibbon or Toynbee on the subject.  Impress me.

>>38

I don't know what school you went to, but I didn't see anything like that.  The only people I've seen getting grades they don't deserve were on the football or basketball team, so it's more of a jock thing than LOL niggers.  And ESL is for immigrants, you ignorant twat -- they don't come out of mama's womb speaking English.  You'd need something similar if you were going to school in France so why the big stink?

>>40's powers of observation are feeble indeed, or else he's some high school boy who's never been to college.

Still waiting for you to explain the fall of Rome to me, incidentally.  "Twat" indeed.

If multiculturalism destroys societies, I think all the whites should move back to their homeland in Europe.

Black guy steals your bike, gets blamed for it by white guys

Mexican steals your wallet, gets blamed for it by white guys

Asian steals your dog, gets blamed for it by white guys

Indian steals your weed, gets blamed for it by white guys

White guy steals indians lands and countries, steals blacks to farm it for them, steals asians to build their transportation, then steals mexicans to clean their houses, and expects to be thanked for it.

Everyone loves white people!

>>42
Nah.  We took North America and Australia from the tiny number of inbred Stone Age cannibal monkeys squatting on them, we did it by right of superior force which we would not have had if we and our societies were not objectively superior, and we like them just fine, thank you.  Outsiders who cannot play nicely with others are cordially invited to go back to whatever Third World cesspit they crawled out of.

Also, stop trying to change the subject.  You were going to explain the fall of Rome to us all, weren't you?  We're all still waiting.

>>42
That was over 100 years ago, all the whites who stole land are dead. Stop thinking in terms of collectives, it's retarded and hypocritical.

>>42 : Perhaps I misunderstood your post.

Did you mean : Thieves can be any colour but non-white thieves mostly steal useless shit like bikes, dogs and weed whereas white thieves steal important shit like continents?

Please explain.

I agree, I'm white and racist. Niggers are racist too, yellows too, reds too, fuck even dogs are racist, mine tend to pee on all the arabs it crosses pass with and shit on all niggers.

So when a white liberal listens to the Jews, hates themselves, and fights for the cause of niggers it's still "not good enough" for them. Interesting.

>>46-47
Tsk.

>>48
un-tsk
>>46-47 provide insights into the causes of racism, namely marxist rabble rousers. Obviously the solution is to crush socialism and all hope of the underclasses ever having any power.

>>49
Marxist
socialism

The politicians in Washington including Obama are products of finance capital, Wall Street and corporate lackeys. How the fuck are they Marxists and promoting socialism? If anything what's going on is soft fascism and merging of state and corporate power.

>>50
By redistributing wealth, of course.  They use the power of the state (taxation) to expropriate the property (money) of productive citizens (working-class whites), and redistribute it (print welfare checks for spics, niggers, and pensioned-off useless eaters) to reward them for shuffling into the voting booth every two years and pressing the big shiny button with the big shiny "D" on it).

This is how American politics has worked since the Communist Jew, Franklin Delano Rosenfelt, seized power in 1933.

Is that clear enough for you, or shall I have to put on a skit with big fuzzy puppets?

>>51
Looking past the ridiculousness and loony conspiracy tinfoil hat, far right-wing propaganda twattle which comprises 85% of your post, welfare systems and social safety nets =/= socialist government. The US has had (albeit not always at the Federal level) some form of welfare. In fact, it even predates the United States when the colonies adopted the British Poor Laws that they themselves date back to 16^th century England, and even as far back as the time of King Edward III and the first labor laws in the 14^th century.

While nowhere near ever as expansive as today's welfare programs, if going strictly by your reasoning, that means that for nearly the past 800 years, England and its now former colonies including what is now the United States, have had "communistic" and "socialistic" policies intent upon "redistribution of wealth"! Instead of government departments and welfare recipients today, it was medieval feudal lords and serfs back then. So in reality, nothing much has changed there, has it?

Lemme guess, you're going to say "But the JOOS! They lobbied for the King and Parliament to pass those welfare and labor laws!" Sorry, due to the Edict of Expulsion in 1290 all Jews were banished from England until 1656. Oops! Can't blame them now, can we?

Now to expose the final hole in your logic, out of the total number of welfare recipients in 2006, whites made up 39%, blacks, 38% and Hispanics, 17%. Since that data was from over four years ago, and the current number of welfare recipients is currently up to 42 million, I would gather that all three racial groups have increased, and I'll bet you that whites still make up the majority of the three.

You've dung in your own grave, and you have no one to blame but yourself.

Is that clear enough for you, or shall I have to put on a skit with big fuzzy puppets?

>>52
Whites = 80%+ of the population, less than 40% of the welfare parasites.

Niggers = 10% of the population, 40% of the welfare parasites.

What feudal lords did with money that was by law their own, of their own free will, has less than nothing to do with governmental policies in a republic, in which the State has no funds of its own and cannot spend one cent without sticking a gun in some White man's face and stealing it from him.

And no, "dung in your own grave" isn't very clear.  Would you like to try that again in some language other than gibberish?  If English is not your first language I can still try to communicate with you.  Ponemayetyu po-russki, yob tvayu maat?  ¿Hablas espanol, puto?  Onihongo wakarimasu-ka, baka?

Aren't you the one who was going to explain the fall of Rome to us about thirty posts back?  We're still waiting.

it is hard to take anyone seriously who uses 'niggers' as a descriptor. have you not the intelligence to construct a valid argument?

>>54
Using the word nigger doesn't invalidate the argument, I am a racist, my argument is valid, I am logical and right, everything you have ever believed, your most heartfelt beliefs, are all total bullshit. Deal with it.

I AM RIGHT. I AM A GOD. DO NOT QUESTION THE RACE GOD, PITIFUL MORTAL.

>>52 just isn't very good at this.  He clearly isn't comfortable with honest debate, yet he wants to get the last word.

Let's wait and see if he sages when he replies again, and then strictly coincidentally a few dozen 5+-year-old troll/spam threads get mysteriously bumped, burying this thread so that I have to dig for it again.  It's just adorable, the way that keeps happening to this thread.  I'm sure it's strictly a coincidence.

>>52, does your mommy know you're using her computer?  Maybe you should just sit down and shut up when grown-ups are talking.

>>53
Whites = 80%+ of the population, less than 40% of the welfare parasites.
Niggers[sic] = 10% of the population, 40% of the welfare parasites.

Irrelevant.
What feudal lords did with money that was by law their own, of their own free will
Bullshit.
has less than nothing to do with governmental policies in a republic, in which the State has no funds of its own and cannot spend one cent without sticking a gun in some White man's face and stealing it from him.
EVERYONE has a gun pointed to them by the IRS come tax time, it ain't just poor old Neo-Nazis.
And no, "dung in your own grave" isn't very clear.  Would you like to try that again in some language other than gibberish?  If English is not your first language I can still try to communicate with you.  Ponemayetyu po-russki, yob tvayu maat?  ¿Hablas espanol, puto?  Onihongo wakarimasu-ka, baka?
Cute. This shows your argument is weak when you take one little typo, and run off with it into some pointless banter using it as a cheap shot at criticism. Sorry, but nobody is buying.
Aren't you the one who was going to explain the fall of Rome to us about thirty posts back?  We're still waiting.
That's a different poster. My first post in this thread is >>52.
>>57 just isn't very good at this.  He clearly isn't comfortable with an actual, rational person, yet he wants to get the last word.
Let's wait and see if he sages when he replies again, and then strictly coincidentally a few dozen 5+-year-old troll/spam threads get mysteriously bumped, burying this thread so that I have to dig for it again.  It's just adorable, the way that keeps happening to this thread.  I'm sure it's strictly a coincidence.
Sure, believe what you may. However, if you lurk around world4ch long enough, you'll realize that automated spam being posted in 3-5 year old threads is a common symptom. Also, your understanding of the sage function implies an immature imageboard-esque worldview of how it's used. I could be wrong about that though.
so that I have to dig for it again.
Ohh, poor baby. I'm just weeping from the empathy I have for you.
>>52, does your mommy know you're using her computer?  Maybe you should just sit down and shut up when grown-ups are talking.
grown-ups

"Grown-ups"? Your worldview is sculpted out of the mind of the average 13 year old boy. If you're a "grown-up" as you suggest, then this discrepancy implies a major developmental disability, though I wouldn't jump to conclusions as that would be quite judgmental on my part. Can't all be so quick to judge, right? Right? Riiiiight. Glad you understand.

>>52 sages again, I see.

Grown-ups are talking, kid.  Maybe you should go do your homework or something.

PROTIP:  yelling "BULLSHIT BULLSHIT" and then playing "LOL SAGE" games doesn't constitute debate.

Does your mommy know you're on 4chan with her computer?

>>59
HURRR I call >>52 a child and make that my argument.
Grow up, or head back to /b/.

>>51
Gee, that must be why Republicans will be the majority party in the House starting January 3^rd, correct? Right.

>>49,51
It's not socialism if the capitalist mode of production is still in place. And I don't see that being replaced anytime soon.

>58, how is that irrelevent? You just ignore something you can't debate right?

Let's get back to the point of this thread. An educator with a phd is claiming that even if I wasn't racist, in her view I'd have to be just that becuase of the way others view me. Hmmm... Makes no sence for me to be an anti then does it?