>>32
The so-called "black middle class" and "black college graduates" you mention never existed before the intervention of the State. On their own merits they could not have risen; their positions now are in effect stolen from working-class Whites who got higher scores on the entrance tests, yet were denied a chance to enter the middle class because of the State's policy of "affirmative action," which is yet another form of welfare check, yet another sop to the niggers to buy their loyalty.
Of course India has more college graduates than we do; they have four times our population, and the billionaire Jew plutocrats who control the US economy have found it extremely profitable to train foreigners to take our jobs at a fraction of our wages. But what does this have to do with the points I raised, good sir?
Your interpretation of Rome's decay and fall is fascinating, and is one I've never seen before, not even in Gibbon, so I suppose you must be a historian. Would you care to expound on these ideas, and tell me where I can find source material to support your position? I had been under the impression that it had far more to do with a two-century-long invasion by foreign barbarians who did not share Roman language or culture, and the replacement of vigorous Roman patriotism with the fatalistic, nihilistic madness of the Christ-cultists, who cared not at all for the state of the society in which they lived and would not defend their way of life.