Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon.

Pages: 1-

King Leopold II was not a mass murderer

Name: Anonymous 2009-07-25 17:09

He only killed thieves and rapists. Is it his fault half the Congolese population were thieves/rapists? I don't think so.

Name: Anonymous 2009-07-26 1:22

Were half of them thieves and rapists?

Name: Anonymous 2009-07-27 20:02

No, only the other half were.  Do try to keep up.

Name: Anonymous 2009-07-28 4:45

>>3
I don't think so.

Name: Anonymous 2009-07-28 9:50

>>4
I guess we know which half you're in now don't we.

Name: Anonymous 2009-07-28 15:22

>>5
I had not been born when King Leopold II was ruling over the Belgian Congo.

Name: Anonymous 2009-07-28 16:44

>>6
King Leopold II never ruled over the Belgian Congo! It was his private territory until his death, when he was forced to give it to Belgium and it became the Belgian Congo.

Name: Anonymous 2009-07-29 1:56

most of them had committed theft or rape or had the intention of doing so, so there was net good achieved in killing all of them, seems reasonable enough,

Name: Anonymous 2009-07-29 2:30

>>8
Everyone alive today who has not committed theft or rape yet, would if given the opportunity.  I'd need something much stronger to justify genocide.

Name: Anonymous 2009-07-29 5:21

>>7
Thankyou poindexter! Now bend over so I can use your ass cheeks as a toast rack.

Name: Anonymous 2009-07-29 5:35

>>10
You like to eat toast from men's behinds? What is wrong with you?!

Name: Anonymous 2009-07-30 3:02

>>11
Eating it isn't the objective.

Name: Anonymous 2009-07-30 5:52


Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List