Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon.

Pages: 1-

Race and crime

Name: Anonymous 2008-11-29 20:50

Are there any actual numbers that are based on the totality of crimes (and not just shitty surveys done) from any country?

Name: RedCream 2008-11-29 21:03

How do you adjust those figures for the increased police presence in the poorer areas that just increases similarly the instances of minority crime?

Name: Anonymous 2008-11-29 23:39

>>2
Raw figures need not be adjusted, rather, if warranted like you say, explained. However, it seems raw figures are almost nowhere to be found if broken-down-by-race is what I seek.

I was specifically searching for reliable rape numbers, intra and interracial, in any country. Rape is usually a crime that has nothing to do with the presumed wealth of the victim. Or so they say. I want to check for myself the strength of the discrepancy between Black-on-White rapes and White-on-Black rapes, for instance, and the extent that Blacks target Whites, Whites avoid Blacks or a combination of the two.

However, the USDOJ statistics prove sort of unreliable for that. First of all, in the perpetrator category they lump in, er, Spics with Whites (Example: http://www.usdoj.gov/dea/fugitives/boston/delacruz.htm ) while separating the White victims from Spic victims according to their methodology. If a White or Black person says 'A Spic raped me' it will get jotted down as White. Secondly, it is a shitty survey that makes grave statistical errors due to the small sample size in comparison to the crime.

So, I was wondering if anyone here knows of a place that properly records this shit, since this board is crazy enough to carry this type of discussions constantly.

Name: Anonymous 2008-12-01 7:43

Name: Anonymous 2008-12-01 12:58

tl;dr - Niggers aren't fully human. If you put 40,000,000 ape-like creatures in an advanced society, and tell them that they are "equal" with the humans, hilarity ensues...assuming you define "hilarity" as endless violence against the humans, which is covered up by the national media.

Name: Anonymous 2008-12-01 22:06

OP here.

>>4
http://www.library.flawlesslogic.com/rape.htm
Thanks, awesome references.
http://www.geniebusters.org/915/35b_prison.html
Meh, not sure what to make of that.
http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/Read.aspx?GUID=F3E3CD97-197F-4D31-BF36-A4CBA45FCB13
It's based on the severely flawed data I mentioned. It's based on a survey and not actual police records, and either overestimates or underestimates the reality of the situation. 'Whites' (includes Spics, as I mentioned in >>3) must have raped more than 0 Blacks, regardless of how repulsive they are. Which is why, when in the shitty survey the Black person raped by a Spic or White person number happens to be 1 instead of 0, statistically it will count as about 6000 Blacks getting raped by 'Whites' or something. The only way to get around this might be to aggregate several tens of years to see what you get. Sigh.
>>5
Agreed, but I'd still like ACCURATE data when arguing about this. It seems, that I can find, no Western government is properly recording it. And by that I mean not giving it to the public.

Name: Anonymous 2008-12-02 3:48

What if we add socioeconomic factors and make a global comparison among minorities, including the situations where a group is majority in a nation and minority in another.

Oh, I'm sorry, I need to argue with butthurt rage instead of logic and reason, and make fallacious derivations from irrelevant statistics, but since I'm not a complete loser whose only way of validating himself is by a delusional belief in pseudoscience telling him he's better than someone, with his greatest achievement being his birth, I can't understand you.

Name: Anonymous 2008-12-02 7:46

>>7
What if we add socioeconomic factors and make a global comparison among minorities, including the situations where a group is majority in a nation and minority in another.
Why, as libtards like to say, correlation is not causation. Basically, niggers being stupid explains both their lower socioeconomic status and, partly, their high crime rates. However, if you want to push this canard on, niggers are still more violent than other humans in the U.S. even after controlling for socioeconomic status. Thus, the best predictor of violent crime in a city is the percentage of niggers in it.
by a delusional belief in pseudoscience telling him he's better than someone
Crime rates are pseudo-science? Golly.

Name: Anonymous 2008-12-02 19:17

>>7
>> socioeconomic factors

>>4
>> rape

Fail.

Name: Anonymous 2008-12-02 19:18

>>7
<< socioeconomic factors

>>4
<< rape

Fail.

Name: Anonymous 2008-12-02 19:18

>>7
socioeconomic factors

>>4
rape

Fail.

Name: Anonymous 2008-12-02 19:28

>>8
No need to call him a libtard, just call him what is he is -- a  http://en.metapedia.org/wiki/Marxist or a http://en.metapedia.org/wiki/Cultural_Marxist is better description, IMHO.

Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List