>>26
Well, what they DID was, in fact, planned economy and they also had a philosophy behind it.
How do you want to define socialism? State owned means of production? CHECK
It was certainly not the way Marx envisioned it but they never claimed to be marxists in the first place.
Name:
Anonymous2008-06-29 6:40
>>44
Here is a retard who still thinks etatism is socialism, and ignoring the fact that even if it was, the nazis had a mixed economy, they claimed to be a "third way". So, you have managed to expose your ignorance in two issues with one post, and your retardation by ignoring >>28 and >>8. It seems the only thing to do if you are going to stick to those delusions is cry more, retarded loser.
Name:
Anonymous2008-06-29 8:45
>>44
The Nazis weren't Socialists, you Libertarian faggot. The Nazis were Statists, first and foremost. Ever heard of Corporatism?
>>48
Something that everyone who isn't a LIBERTARYAN subscribes to.
Name:
Anonymous2008-06-29 14:47
>>48
Won't give his definition cuz he's a nigger...
Name:
Anonymous2008-06-29 15:18
>>47
Why not check out non LIBERTARYAN sources for a universally recognized one? Not to mention, the countless times you should have seen it around here, if you weren't busy screaming BUSH IS SOSHALIST. Oh, right, you are incapable of learning and comprehending, sorry.
Name:
Anonymous2008-06-29 16:43
>>50
I'll use an improved of your style to disprove you.
Fight fire with fire.
nigger
Name:
Anonymous2008-06-29 16:50
>>51
You have only managed to expose your retardation again by having a post that not only contains no facts, but also one revealing your denial of the posted facts, and an additional conscious denial you have orchestrated to deny the obvious reality that you are retarded - which is always given with a reason. Also, I urge you to at least learn English before humiliating yourself further by continuing in the vicious cycle of ignorance and denial.
Is it any small coincidence that Libertaryan who appears to be such a strong supporter of Nazism is deliberately mispelled LibertARYAN.
I think not. Also, I do have to agree with the OP. >>28
WIKIPEDIA MOTHERFUCKER CAN YOU USE IT?
"Nazi publications and speeches included anti-capitalist (especially anti-finance capitalist) rhetoric.[53] Hitler attacked what he called “pluto-democracy,” which he claimed to be a Jewish conspiracy to favor democratic parties in order to keep capitalism intact.[54] The “corporation” was attacked by orthodox Nazis as being the leading instrument of finance capitalism, with the role of Jews emphasized.[55] The National Socialist party described itself as socialist, and, at the time, conservative opponents such as the Industrial Employers Association described it as “totalitarian, terrorist, conspiratorial, and socialist.”[56]"
Congratulations in ignoring their actions, and the fact that they opposed socialism brutally, which also was in their rhetoric, retarded loser. You'll just have to cry harder and read >>28 over and over again.
Name:
Anonymous2008-06-30 13:20
>>55
Wikipedia is a garbage source. Use of it as reference diqualifies you from the discussion...
>>56 won't admit it because he, himself, is actually Bolshevik vermin.
Name:
Anonymous2008-06-30 17:32
Conservapedia is a better source.
Name:
Anonymous2008-06-30 17:34
I'm starting a new school of thought, called retard socialism. Basically, it's the same as libertarianism, but it has socialism in its name, and it opposes other socialists fitting the definition, but since they are other variants of socialism, and my fallacious ideology won't be judged by intelligent people who can understand definitions and observe reality in its relation to history, libertaryanism is now socialist. You all must kill yourselves after this perfect chain of logic, which either exposed to you how retarded your thought was, or made you evil soshalists. Goodbye.
Name:
Anonymous2008-06-30 17:59
>>63
LOL.
Has been owned so many times, he's getting delirious..
Name:
Anonymous2008-06-30 20:08
>>64
If by "owned" you mean "exposed logical fallacies and put out irrefutable facts on the table repeatedly, which some retards responded in various tones of whining", then yes. But that would imply your definition of owned is ass-backwards like your definition of socialism, but hey that is mental retardation for you...
Name:
Anonymous2008-07-01 10:34
>>65
Let's hear your definition of socialism, comrade...
(crickets)
Yeah, that's what I thought...Your subservience continues...
Name:
Anonymous2008-07-01 11:36
>>66
facepalm.jpg
How retarded are you exactly? Not only it is irrelevant (...and, you haven't managed to answer a single one of the factual arguments here), if you knew how to read, you could easily understand, but instead of learning you chose to make another post exposing your retardation.
The only thing left to you is cry more, look at this thread and all others and see how your inferior mind void of knowledge has failed again and again when faced with reality. Scream louder BUSH IS SOSHALIST!! NAZIS ARE SOSHALIST!!! and maybe you won't hear reality, retarded loser.
Name:
Anonymous2008-07-01 11:54
>>67
What countries, in your view, are socialist then?...
Name:
Anonymous2008-07-01 18:01
Ahhh, Hitler. A great man. JFK having endorsed him was his one saving grace.
Name:
Anonymous2008-07-01 18:06
Er, JFK's saving grace, that is.
Name:
Libertaryan2008-07-01 18:10
>>68
EVERYWHERE EXCEPT LIBERTARYAN PARADISE ON EARTH SOMALIA!!!!!!
Name:
Anonymous2008-07-01 18:19
The term reductio ad Hitlerum (Latin: you're Hitler) is a flawless logical thought process or rational sense of reasoning that proves you are all like Hitler in some way, shape, or form. The reductio ad Hitlerum logic is of the form "Adolf Hitler (or the Nazi party) supported X; therefore X must be evil". This logic is often effective due to the near-instant condemnation of anything to do with Hitler or the Nazis.
It is important to understand that those policies advocated by Hitler and his party that are generally considered good-natured, are all accepted by themselves, but because Hitler supported them, they are evil. In other words: genocide and Aryan white supremacy (for example) are considered evil because Hitler advocated them, rather than Hitler is considered evil because he advocated them.
The rational nature of reductio ad Hitlerum is best illustrated by identifying X as something that Adolf Hitler or his supporters did promote but which is not considered evil — for example, X = "owning dogs", X = "painting watercolors", X = "exterminating the Jews".
>>75
Aww look, the retarded libertarian crying in a manner that shows his complete lack of comprehension over both the issue at hand and how he clearly was brought to brink of tears. You should keep in mind all the "retarded" arguments parodied are actually seriously perpetrated by you and your retarded bretheren, while you imitated this in trying to construct a shitty strawman. Is there anything you retards don't fail at?
Name:
Anonymous2008-07-03 2:42
>>76
Under a libertarianism firearms would be widespread preventing Hitler's brownshirts from terrorising voters, there would also be a constitution outlining libertarian principles and instructing people to shoot Hitler should he attempt to dissolve or disobey them.
>>77
In addition to failure in content, notice the irrelevancy in the drooling sounds the retarded loser makes about his wet dream of being under several libertarianisms on bed.