Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon.

Pages: 1-4041-

Joe Biden: Secretary of State?

Name: Anonymous 2008-05-23 23:19

Joe Biden: Secretary of State?

Name: Anonymous 2008-05-23 23:55

If you want.

Name: Barack Obama 2008-05-24 1:38

I was thinking more of Reverend Wright for Secretary of State, my good friend Tony Rezko for Secretary of the Treasury, and Johnny Cochran for Attorney General.

Name: Anonymous 2008-05-25 8:56

>>3

???

I wish you guys would stop posting this stupid shit about Obama. At least give us some plausible shit. Oh wait, you can't! You don't even know his stance, you just know he's black. FAIL HARDER, FAGGOT.

Name: Anonymous 2008-05-25 9:37

>>4
We know exactly what he is, tar baby.
A RADICAL MUSLIM MARXIST-INFLUENCED EMPTY SUIT.

Name: Anonymous 2008-05-25 10:28

Prove it, VANIGGER

Name: Anonymous 2008-05-25 11:14

>>6
I got yer proof right here, Nancyboy!(I'm grabbing my massive package).

Name: Anonymous 2008-05-25 14:06

>>4
He has no stance.  He makes speeches with zero informational content and he scrupulously avoids claiming to have any opinion or any position about anything whatsoever.  But we DO know he's a creature of the infamously corrupt Chicago Democratic Party machine, and we DO know that he made a career out of being a Mob mouthpiece for honest-to-god gangsters like Tony Rezko before he decided he wanted to be President.  And we also know exactly what he thinks of working-class whites, but only because he let it slip out during an unguarded moment.

And we DO know who he chooses to associate with.  We know that Chicago gangster Tony Rezko, a close personal friend and very lucrative client, has contributed a quarter of a million dollars to his campaign.  We know who his closest friends and advisers are:  Weather Underground copkiller and unrepentant terrorist William "Guilty as sin, free as a bird, ain't this a great country" Ayers, the Reverend Jeremiah Wright, and Louis Farrakhan.

Of course we're not supposed to bring up his associations, which is FUCKING HILARIOUS because McCain got bashed and roasted daily for seeking the endorsement of some nonentity hick preacher who, he found out later, had said some rather bizarre things about the Holocaust.  McCain rejected him and his endorsement, and, we should also remember, nonentity hick preacher guy WASN'T his lifelong pastor and didn't baptize his kids.

But I guess this is 4chan and I should just go back to the normal level of discourse around here.  LOL NEGARS, LOL JOOZ, LOL BUTTHURT FAGORTS, U FAIL, NO U, FAGORT FAGORT FAGORT, ANAL FISTING BY JEWS

Name: Anonymous 2008-05-25 15:54

>>8
Do you consider it ironic to cry about someone making speeches with zero informational content with a post with no informational content?

Name: Anonymous 2008-05-25 16:37

>>9
BAWWWWW>>8OWNSMEBAWWWWWW

Name: Anonymous 2008-05-25 17:05

>>10
I see that you're crying, but clearly you mixed up the numbers of the posts you meant to quote...

Name: Anonymous 2008-05-25 17:46

>>11
Or maybe he didn't and you're just a whiny butthurt fucktard who can't respond any other way.

Name: Anonymous 2008-05-25 18:50

>>12
Level of irony reaching extreme proportions after a retard cries about 'not being able to respond in any other way' to >>11, even though there is >>10 right above it, which, the last time I checked, is not a proper response.

Reflect the pain in your ass somewhere else.

Name: Anonymous 2008-05-25 18:58

>>13
CRY MOAR

BAWWWWWWWWWWWW BAWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW BAWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW

If you have no better response then that I recommend you STFU and GTFO before you make yourself look any more foolish.

Name: Anonymous 2008-05-25 19:05

>>14
The irony is evermore, as you, the retard who cried about some irrelevant thing in a manner which made you look ever more retarded, then made the preceding ironic comment, and is now making this pathetic spectacle while being unable to spell at the same time, is now crying about looking foolish.

I'm starting to think that you're doing this on purpose...

Name: Anonymous 2008-05-25 20:11

4chan: Repercussions of Liberalism

>>15 waited. The posts above him blinked and sparked out of the air. There were conservatives in /newpol/. He didn't see them, but had expected them now for years. His warnings to President Obama were not listenend to and now it was too late. Far too late for now, anyway.

>>15 was a Democratic Underground member for fourteen months. When he was young he watched the debates and he said to dad "I want to be on the ships daddy."
Dad said "No! You will BE PWN BY CONSERVATIVES"

There was a time when he believed him. Then as he got oldered he stopped. But now in the /newpol/ board of the 4chan he knew there were conservatives.

"This is Obama" the radio crackered. "You must debate the conservatives!"

So >>15 whined and refused to respond to anyone's points.

"HE GOING TO AMUSE US" said the conservatives

"I will laugh at him" said the neocon and he pressed the reply button. >>15 whined at him and tried to shut him up. But then the thread got deleted and he was pwned and not able to debate.

"No! I must defeat the conservatives" he shouted

The radio said "No, >>15. You are the conservatives"

And then >>15 was Henry Kissinger.

Name: Anonymous 2008-05-25 20:36

>>16
Fail for too much effort.

Name: Anonymous 2008-05-25 21:24

Biden would be better than Rice

Name: Anonymous 2008-05-26 3:26

>>8

>He has no stance.

What the fuck are you talking about?
http://www.barackobama.com/issues/

>But we DO know he's a creature of the infamously corrupt Chicago Democratic Party machine, and we DO know that he made a career out of being a Mob mouthpiece for honest-to-god gangsters like Tony Rezko before he decided he wanted to be President.

We know and we don't care. George W. Bush was a fucking drunken cokehead posing naked for pictures as a C-level yale student. The Old Bush family owned companies that aided the Nazis. Their old companies are part of the reason why our gas prices our high. Oh but we're not supposed to talk about that, right? For every one thing you "Expose" about Obama there's something about McCain, Bush and co that's 100 times worse.

And we also know exactly what he thinks of working-class whites, but only because he let it slip out during an unguarded moment.

He made a comment about rural whites clinging to their religion and guns. Guess what, faggot? HE'S RIGHT and we're SICK OF YOU CHRISTFAG STORMFRONT FUCKS FUCKING UP OUR COUNTRY! His comment was only bad because you're not supposed alienate citizens. But with Dick "I don't care what the people think, send 'em to the desert to die" Cheney in office- you can see that you just sound like a whiny faggot grasping at straws like cocks dancing in front of your face.

About the rest of the bullocks.........
We caught Obama's shit first. It took LONGER for McCain to reject Hagee than it took Obama to reject Reverend Wright's endorsement. Is your head so far up your ass that you really believe McCain had NO CLUE about Hagee? The current conservative party is flooded with bible thumbing bigots like Hagee. And the fact that McCain is still aligned with the same group of people from this failhard administration cancels out anybody Obama "hangs out with". Who cares if some dumbfuck paster baptized his kids? My parents don't attend the church or listen to the pastor who baptised me anymore. It doesn't mean shit.

YOU FAIL. MCCAIN IS FAIL. GET OVER IT

Name: Anonymous 2008-05-26 6:08

>>16
This how butthurt conservatives cry in denial of their ownage. If you spent all that time to read and learn, maybe you wouldn't have to delude yourself so much...

Name: Anonymous 2008-05-26 9:23

>>19
LOL baw.
Polls have McCain and Obama even in a match up for the general election and some actually have McCain ahead.
This is an embarassment for Democrats. If Americans believed all the bitching you did in your post, Obama should be leading McCain by 40 points.
When McCain and Obama go head to head in the debates, Obama will be lucky if he comes out of them alive.
Saying "Hope and Change" over and over again aint gonna cut it against McCain...

Name: Anonymous 2008-05-26 11:23

>>21
I don't think you're talking about the same McCain. We're discussing the American presidential candidate.

Name: Anonymous 2008-05-26 19:57

>>22
Revealing admission of butthurtness..

Name: Anonymous 2008-05-26 20:11

>>23
If by butthurt you mean correct, then yes.

Name: Anonymous 2008-05-26 21:33

>>21

Ever notice everytime a conservafag is being owned he cries "baw".  I guess you're in a way, Americans won't "believe" the truth about McCain because they- like you- will look at this election through a race filter. There is no other plausible reason for Obama to lose based on his current platform other than race. McCain represents the last 8 years which has fucking sucked. A vote for McCain is saying the last 8 years has been awesome. If Americans don't vote for Obama then they want their country in the shitter. SImple.

Name: Anonymous 2008-05-26 22:12

>>25
What platform?

"We can CHANGE AMERICUH!  WOOP WOOP!  I'm ALL FIRED UP!  WOOP WOOP!  Yes we can!  WOOP WOOP!"

That's all that comes out of Obama bin Laden's mouth, unless he fails to notice the cameras are still running, then he whines about those dumb honky hicks who, horrors! might not vote for him, possibly because his party wants to put them in jail for owning guns if not go all-out Waco on their asses and burn them all alive in their homes.  Them bitter honky hicks!

Your hypersensitivity is pretty revealing.  I made an off-the-cuff joke in >>3 and you've been going fucking batshit ever since.  "OBAMUH SHOULD B LEFT ALONE!"

BAWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW some more, libfag.  Your tears amuse me greatly.

Name: Anonymous 2008-05-27 11:45

>>26

http://www.barackobama.com/issues/

The only kind of "tears" that amuse you are tear of dickjuice leaking out of your boyfriend's asshole. Quick, slurp that shit up from the floor of the bathroom stall! You're missin' it all.

Name: Anonymous 2008-05-27 11:51

>>27
PENIS PENIS PENIS PENIS PENIS PENIS PENIS.

Talk about penises some more, this IS 4chan after all.

I guess you're not even going to try to make any more substantial reply than that, huh?  Pathetic.

PWNED.

Next?

Name: Anonymous 2008-05-27 11:56

>>27
p.s.  Yeah, Obama bin Laden had one of his staffers put up a Web page with some Democratic Party platform boilerplate copypasta.  It contains not one idea, not one phrase, not one word that would have been new or surprising in 1974.  WOOP WOOP CHANGE!  WOOP WOOP NOT THE SAME OLD POLITICS!  WOOP WOOP YES WE CAN!  I wonder if he's even read it.  Probably not.

Name: Anonymous 2008-05-27 12:48

>>29
>Obama bin Laden
Oh man, you're so original and smart, how did you come up with this witty new thing? It's nice of you to say it, because it's so funny and not at all butthurt. The rest of your post also has a similar level of intelligence which I loved - all crying and no facts, my favourite...

Name: Anonymous 2008-05-27 14:03

>>30
Obvious ad HOMOnem.

Name: Anonymous 2008-05-27 15:36

>>31
Obvious butthurt

Name: Anonymous 2008-05-28 0:54

>>30
"All crying and no facts?"  LOLWUT

I've read his shitty page and his shitty warmed-over Disco-era boilerplate copypaste platform.  Have you?

Give me three positions Obama bin Laden has taken publicly that differ in any way, shape, form, or fashion from the Democratic Party platform boilerplate of 1974.  Three.  Just three.

I'm waiting.  Tick tick tick.

Name: Anonymous 2008-05-28 6:11

>>33
Typical DERP DERP DERP 2+2=5!!! PROOV ME RONG!!!! crying, very common among butthurt neocons.

PROTIP: You are supposed to prove the claims you made, not wait for others to disprove your retarded delusions.

Name: Anonymous 2008-05-28 7:59

>>18
You can round up random people off streets for that position, and chances are they still will be better than Rice.

Then again, I just remembered that we were talking about America. My statement is still valid if you don't do the rounding up there though.

Name: Anonymous 2008-05-29 1:00

>>34
His irrefutable proof is the solid fact that Obama has no positions that differ from the Democratic Party platform boilerplate of 1974.

So there's your proof, either show that his proof is invalid or admit you have been acting like an idiot and instantly become a hot blooded McCain supporting redneck.

Name: Anonymous 2008-05-29 13:17

>>36

There's no reason to show that as "invalid" for the following reasons:

1. There's nothing wrong with the Democratic Party platform of 74. Nixon was office. He was a Republican. 'Nuff said.

2. Obama's positions differ from that platform in many areas. Some of those areas are obvious, but you don't know that because you didn't click on the link to read what he's about in the first place.

3. Republicans don't get to frame the argument in a time where they've given us 8 years of pure fail. Obama isn't answerable to McCain. Bush, Cheney, McCain and everyone in that administration is answerable to us and our representative.

Name: Anonymous 2008-05-29 14:41

>>36
And even if that was true, the current situation isn't as described there, so therefore implementing those '74 programs would indeed be CHAYNG. That isn't how you prove something.

Name: Anonymous 2008-05-29 18:57

>>38
Shitneck from way back.

Name: Anonymous 2008-05-30 2:13

>>37
You keep saying that, but c'mon, let's hear about those "many areas."

Tick tick tick.  It's been two days.  Your closest thing to a cogent response is "There's nothing wrong with the Democratic Party platform of 74," by which I must assume you are conceding the point.

Or are you going to BAWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW some more, self-hating libfag?

Name: sgt sage 2008-05-30 2:17

ahh /newpol/ the scene of the slow motion grudge match

Name: Anonymous 2008-05-30 2:20

>>41
Two fucking days and that's all that pathetic little maggot can come up with.  BACKPEDAL A LITTLE FASTER, whydontcha?

This is pretty goddamn sad, all things considered.

Name: Anonymous 2008-05-30 17:42

Name: Anonymous 2008-05-31 2:04

>>43
Like how to copy and paste, like his staffers did, amirite?

Name: Anonymous 2008-05-31 8:11

>>43
LOOK AT HIS ECONOMIC POLICIES

"Economy

As president, Barack Obama will implement a 21st century economic agenda to help ensure that America can compete in a global economy, and ensure the middle class is thriving and growing. He will increase investments in infrastructure, energy independence, education, and research and development; modernize and simplify our tax code so it provides greater opportunity and relief to more Americans; and implement trade policies that benefit American workers and increase the export of American goods."

WHAT A FUCKING ASSHOLE HE'LL FUCK UP THIS COUNTRY

Name: Anonymous 2008-05-31 9:52

>>45
OMG NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!

Name: Anonymous 2008-05-31 12:20

>>45
LOL I don't think that statement could be any more generic.

Name: Anonymous 2008-05-31 12:52

>>47
Fucking your mom's pussy is pretty generic, but I still do it anyway.

Name: Anonymous 2008-05-31 14:26

>>45
Cry moar.

That copypasta basically says "If you elect me I will do Good Stuff."  That empty promise only goes back to, what, Millard Fillmore?

Is this really and truly the best you can do?  No wonder you keep talking about penises.

Name: Anonymous 2008-05-31 17:53

>>49
While his opponent has... oh, waiit

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-01 2:58

>>49
DUH, WHAT WE WANT TO KNOW IS HOW BADLY HE WILL ASSRAPE THE ECONOMY COMPARED TO THE OTHER CANDIDATE

a 21st century economic agenda = internets

ensure that America can compete in a global economy = mercantilism

ensure the middle class is thriving and growing = give future plumbers the opportunity to study liberal arts and sociology

increase investments in infrastructure, energy independence, education, and research and development = state monopolies

modernize and simplify our tax code so it provides greater opportunity and relief to more Americans = taxing minorities

implement trade policies that benefit American workers and increase the export of American goods= arbitrary tariffs and subsides

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-01 7:54

>>51
DERP DERP DERP LIBERTARYANIZM!!!! DERP DERP DERP DERP DERP COMPETISHUN MEANZ MERKANTILIZM I'M JUST THAT RETARDED DERP DERP DERP DERP DERP MIDDLE KLAS MEANS LIBRAL ARTS DERP DERP DERP STAAYT!!! STAYT BUTTRAPED ME AS A KID!!! I HATE RESEARCH, ENERGY INDEPENDENCE! I'M A RETARD THAT LOVES SUCKING CORPORATE COCK, THEREFORE ANTTHING GOOD IS EVIL BEKUZ ITS STAYT MONOPOLAH AND SOOSHLIST!!! DERP DERP DERP ALSO, BAWWW TARIFFS!!! I WISH EVERYONE WAS AS RETARDED AS ME SO RON PAWL WAS ELECTED AND I COULD ENJOY CORPORATE RAPE THAT I'VE BEEN WAITING MY WHOLE LIFE DUE TO MY RETARDATION AND INDOCTRINATION DUE TO FAILED EDUCATION!!!

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-01 18:23

>>50
Try to keep up.

I asked for three, 3, only three, policy proposals Obama bin Laden has made that are in disagreement with anything in the Democratic Party Platform from 1974.

You've had several days now to come up with something other than DERP DERP DERP PENIS PENIS PENIS.

If I were you I'd STFU and GTFO and then possibly become an hero.  Or are you going to stick around and entertain us some more?  "BAWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW BRITNEY SHOULD B LEFT ALOAN, I MEAN OSAMA"

Name: WhIt3b0i!!!92 2008-06-01 19:11

OMG OBAMA BIN LADEN SUXXAZ HIS EKONOMIC POLICY IS BAD OR SOMETHING, LIKE TOTALLY FROM THE 70'S, LET ME IGNORE THE COUNTERARGUMENTS AND CRY MORE

Name: Obama bin Laden 2008-06-02 21:50

WOOP WOOP!  I'm all fired up!  WOOP WOOP!  Change!  WOOP WOOP!  Not the same tired old politics!  WOOP WOOP!  We can do it together!  WOOP WOOP!  I'm not your father's politician!  WOOP WOOP!  I'm new and improved!  WOOP WOOP!  You've never seen anyone like me before!  WOOP WOOP!

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-03 16:46

>>55
sup whiteboi

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-04 0:59

I don't know what's up around here, but I know what's down.

The number of posts from that pathetic crybaby who's been whining and pissing himself and BAWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWING in this thread ever since I made a little off-the-cuff joke in post >>3.

I guess he's feeling kind of pwned right now.  I CLAIM SPNAK

Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List