>>2 Answer: The first posting I ever made to 4chan was in response to a person asking about blood in his semen. When responding, I chose a name on a whim, and that was "RedCream". So there is a link there as some have suspected, but it's not as involved as they thought.
Name:
Anonymous2008-03-19 14:26
But why associate yourself with blood and semen? Do you imagine, after trolling someone, that you have metaphorically butt raped the other person?
>>4
Firstly, my response to the person was not a troll.
Secondly, the topic was about blood IN the semen, not about a mixture of blood and semen as one may expect from anal rape. It was a medical question, and I gave it the requisite medical answer.
Thirdly, a nickname can just be a silly reference, and as such, is not designed to be associated.
You can draw whatever conclusions you wish. You have my answers.
Name:
Anonymous2008-03-19 16:01
You post here a lot RedCream. If you have all the answers why don't you run for office?
>>6
Because obviously I don't have any money thanks to our communist government. The jews are keeping me back, who cares if I could never graduate from high school, I DESERVE MORE THAN THIS!
>>6
Sorry about >>7. I have a lot of cloans. Many try to be close to the source of wisdom by imitating it, you understand?
Answer: I'm unfit for public office. But I've found that's sufficient to have all the answers and to pass these on to my fellow citizens. After all, the big problem is not the politicians -- it's the dipshits who vote for these fuckers.
do you beleive that "BRAND NAMING SOMETHING" tends to be used too generally since most people don't think before they act. just dont know the deeper meaning. the less educated thinking tends to do that.
EXAMPLES
using the word "politics"
- most people just say that and don't give a care in the world. Its like saying that person is a witch. Kinda like the salem witch trails. Anyone who is part of their country is part of politics.
like these exaples
1.Terrorist
2.middle class
3.V-tec
the people are the government like the basic stature of society
I guess you know what i mean. its like the blame game as well.
people generally don't think in many outer situation.
this is the first time i went to the text boards and really got to say something.
Redcream- I guess keep doing some more feedbacks. kinda cool in a way.
ITT: Tremendous amount of samefaggotry and unwarranted self-importance.
Name:
Anonymous2008-03-20 18:43
>>15
OMG U R TEH SO BRILLIANT PLS I WANT TO TITTY FUCK YOU WITH MY ENORMOUS TITS WHILST YOU LICK MY CLIT
Name:
Anonymous2008-03-20 18:45
AHAHAHAHA FAGGOTS IM A MOTHERFUCKING MOTHERFUCKER MOTHERFUCKER AND I FUCKED YOU MOTHER MOTHERFUCKER
I OWN A FLEET OF SPORTS CARS AND A $50000 IN THE SIERRAS, I DINE IN OPULENT SPLENDOUR WITH THE RICH AND FAMOUS AND GET LAID WITH MY 9 TROPHY WIVES EACH NIGHT
WHY THE FUCK AREN'T YOU ON YOU KNEES WITH THEM SUCKING MY DICK YOU DEMENTED CUNTS?!
AHAHHAHAHAHAHAA, I WIN THIS ARGUMENT YOU STUPID TWAT
Name:
Anonymous2008-03-20 20:02
>I'm unfit for public office. But I've found that's sufficient to have all the answers and to pass these on to my fellow citizens. After all, the big problem is not the politicians -- it's the dipshits who vote for these fuckers.
If this is true, then why are you doing it on 4chan? There are a lot more legitimate outlets for a citizen such as yourself to express his political beliefs and have them taken more seriously.
>>12 RedCream, is it true that you are our father and we are your childrens?
No. Where did you come by such an idea?
>>13 ITT: Tremendous amount of samefaggotry and unwarranted self-importance.
I sense your jealousy from here. That's curious, since there's not a whole lot to be jealous of. So perhaps you lust after my anus, and this is how you express that repressed desire. You filthy little boy.
>>16 I've found that's sufficient to have all the answers and to pass these on to my fellow citizens. If this is true, then why are you doing it on 4chan?
I found 4chan's freely-speaking environment to my particular taste. I also post on other boards, which covers a modest spectrum, and 4chan is merely one pole of a multipolar set of attitudes. You gotta post somewhere, right? 4chan is merely one of the (lucky?) ones I've chosen, and that choice was fairly arbitrary if not outrightly random.
Name:
Anonymous2008-03-21 15:00
>>17
We already knew you were retarded, there was no need to explicitly state it.
>>18
Didn't that sort of technique grow stale back in grade school?
Aha! I get it now. You're still IN grade school. Well, carry on, little lad. I swear, you're so cute, that I could pinch your chubby cheeks ... with a set of pliers.
>>21
No, no, old son. You can't catch me up with that. I highly prize the compartmentalization I've achieved with my Internet posting habits. I let the mad screamer and demented dreamer run free here on 4chan, garnished with a little fearless common sense. However, the MSaDD is not welcome anywhere else. To save my gentler personas on other boards, I'll have to refuse to reveal those other boards. I'm sure you understand.
>>23
Are you gonna just stand there lookin' foolish, or are you gonna use that spork, Sparky?
>>24 Answer: Who cares? The larger picture is that the Nazis killed Poles, Gays and Gypsies as well as Jews. It's only due to our Jew-controlled media that we are conditioned to think that WWII was a war where only Jews suffered or mattered.
>>28
No newfaggotry here. I've been posting as RedCream for about a year. So, let your nostrils fill fully with the rancid stench of your FAIL.
Name:
Anonymous2008-03-23 6:17
>>29
Then why do you BBBBAAWWW so hard over jews in the holocaust? Perhaps commenting once or twice on the matter is justified but the tomes of faggotry you spew forth and manage to inseminate into every thread is bizarre. The holocaust isn't really that much of a big deal in society and the fact that jews get a little more attention than other groups is in proportion to the number of jews killed there compared to non-jews.
Name:
Anonymous2008-03-23 6:18
>>29
Your reply to >>23 reveals you to be a newfag. If you are not a newfag you will be able to debunk this claim easily.
>>34
Seldom. I was poasting on /n/ for a little while before moot completely fagged it up. Sometimes I prowl /wp/, and when I see an Iron Man thread, I poast something like:
"Fuck Stark! CAP WAS RIGHT!"
... because Tony Stark's helmeted head needs to be torn off his body by one of the Warbound or something. At least, Thor should have done it, but even Thor went all suspiciously ghei and only knocked Stark around a little. Fucking Marvel Comics! They fucking blew in my ear, tweaked a nipple, and lightly jerked me off with the Civil War storyline ... and then did NOTHING to satisfy me. I'm still drippin' pre-cum, here.
>>42
I'm not a faggot at all, Sir, in any meaning facet of that gleaming diamond of definition.
Always remember that if you don't like something you see, then LOOK ELSEWHERE. You have every right to CHANGE THE CHANNEL.
Name:
Anonymous2008-03-24 6:23
RedCream likes the attention.
Name:
Anonymous2008-03-24 9:18
RedCream, Why are you so over-the-top emo about all subjects? ie,the sky is always falling?
Name:
Anonymous2008-03-24 9:42
Where do the Indo Europeans come from?
And why are Zoroastrianism and Hinduism so different from other Indo European religions?
Is it true that in South Asia, South East Asia and Indonesia the original population was black like Dravidians and Aboriginals but that whiter caucasoid and mongoloid peoples invaded and exterminated them except in South India, Australia and many little islands in the Indian and Pacific Ocean?
Name:
Anonymous2008-03-24 11:00
Dearest RedCream, why is lesbianism so inflammable?
>>45 Answer: Do you read the news? Do you know anything about finance and politics? The Holy American Empire is collapsing as any fool can see if he has at least half a brain and one eye open.
Also, this "emo" crap is your interpretation. You must get that impression each time somebody tells you the truth. You live in a society heavily based upon deceit and you're unable to appropriately respond to reality.
>>46 Answer: Indo-Europeans come from Indo-Europe, which was a large island in the eastern Mediterranean. The island collapsed in 4000BC due to intense volcanic action, giving rise to the Atlantis legend of today.
That's how I understand it. Of course, Wikipedia may differ.
>>46 again Answer: Zoroastrianism and Hinduism differ so significantly from other Indo-European religions since those red dots on the heads of Hindus are actually live wounds, as a result of a periodic involvement in a skull-drilling rite practiced in their religions. (Ref. trepanation.) The repetitive brain injury tends to leave such adherents a bit addled.
>>47 Answer: Lesbianism is so inflammable since -- fuck, it's TWO HAWT FUCKIN' CHICKS, MAN!!!! They're lickin' and suckin' EACH OTHER. That's hawty hawt.
Name:
Anonymous2008-03-24 20:37
>>51
The area between the eyebrows (where the bindi is placed) is said to be the sixth chakra, ajna, the seat of "concealed wisdom". According to followers of Tantrism, this chakra is the exit point for kundalini energy. The Bindi is said to retain energy and strengthen concentration. [3]. It is also said to protect against demons or bad luck. In addition to the bindi a vermilion mark in the parting of the hair just above the forehead is worn by married women as a symbol of their married status. During Indian marriage ceremonies, the groom applies sindoor on the parting in the bride's hair. Depending on the dharam of the religion colours vary. Ancient Buddhist women wore similar marks (for purely decorative purposes) since the second century, which became popular during the Tang Dynasty.
Name:
Anonymous2008-03-24 20:41
So we've been neglecting our Sixth Chakra all this time
Name:
Anonymous2008-03-24 23:47
>>26
Hey news flash thats not jew controlled media thats goverment controled media which it uses to rally sympthy behind the jews (jews recogonise the losses of others during the tragety all looses.) Thus they use that as an excuse for thier support to israel (which israel honestly dosent need.) In an effort to on one hand to destablise the area and on the other bring peace and aid.
>>56 Answer: Although one will almost certainly outsell the other, even by as little as 1 console, they are still FAIL, since consoles are gay. Real gamers use a PC.
>>58 Answer: It's not about quantity, it's about quality. You can only play so many games in any seasonal period, anyway. Remember, normal people have to eat, bathe, sleep, and go to work. The time left over for gaming is understood quite plainly by real gamers to be quality time, and that means with equal simplicity PC-based games.
In contrast, the consoles are for dorks, rubes and poseurs. True, there isn't a shortage of those population sectors, but no matter how many dorks, rubes and poseurs there are, they are STILL dorks, rubes and poseurs.
Name:
Anonymous2008-03-26 3:04
Real gamers only play the MMORPG they are addicted to.
>>62 [b]Answer:[b] From what I understand, as Pvt. Jackson in the US forces, you have to hold off the Germans' retreat into the city. The instrumental way to perform that act is to whip out your throbbing cock, and using lethal spurts of salty seed, envelop the enemy soldiers in groups of 4 or more. Your sticky spend will suffocate enough soldiers that by the time the Allied bombers arrive, you hold the line. The German surrender then follows.
>>65 Answer: Anyone who's not a fucking retard knows that current socio-economic reality just DEMANDS sarcasm at every salient point in the analysis string.
Answer: "Horrid selection" is exactly correct. What you have to choose from IS horrid. Remember, this is a battle of quality over quantity, and in that metaphor, you're a Nazi collaborator. How wretched is the color of your FAIL? Very.
>>72 Answer: Choosing to be a namefag is an equally valid choice to anonyfaggotry. If I can type a NAME in the Name field, then it's a perfectly valid action.
The information in my poasting remains, too. So you get DOUBLE the deal with a RedCream poasting. Does the use of a name deny the truth of the words used? In a rational universe, NO.
The shitstorms so stirred are the choice of those who seem to react by tossing feces. I can't control them and neither can you.
>>74
Although the content of a post you make will be essentially the same your reputation can taint it. Some fags will automatically believe your post is shit just because they don't like you. Of course that's their own problem if they can't spot a sound argument. BUT, if you're really trying to convince others of your opinion, wouldn't you want to choose the option that would best ensure that your message is received?
Name:
Anonymous2008-03-31 17:39
>>76
I forgot to add, conversely some readers might falsely believe you are correct, solely on the merit of your name, without really evaluating your statements.
>>76
You're not exactly catching on that the content of my postings is essentially all of the data that forms my "reputation".
Just because some people can't handle highway speeds, doesn't mean the speed limit on the highway should be set to 35mph. A few people will take unwarranted liberties with assuming things about me on the basis of namefagging of the poasting. We can reject those few as essentially experimental error in the great, bubbling beaker of 4chan. The majority can handle it.
My message is best sent off in the format that conveys my message in the language it was put, and was labeled as I desired. I am the judge of what's best in my poastings.
Name:
Anonymous2008-03-31 19:36
Is it true that you actually have 2 assholes? The second one being located directly below your nose?
Why was there no crack epidemic in Europe? Is it because European socialism is superior or because the CIA caused the crack epidemic in America intentionally?
>>90 Answer: Europe on average hasn't demonized the use of recreational drugs, hence marijuana is fairly common. It's not European Socialism; it's just a sane and sensible approach to allowing the population to get a little high with little effort and no real legal worries. So, there's no need to indulge in law-avoidance, which is what happens in the USA, which is partially why people just go all the way and CRACK IT UP. If you're going to be breaking the law anyway, and will be subject to some stiff penalties, you might as well just get an intense high.
As for the CIA, they've been behind such supply lines in the US for a long time. Think of it as Big Brother Government, making sure you have enough supply of drugs, so he can have a fairly good stream of black money for his nefarious purposes.
How was the movie soooo far ahead of its time? Did the producers use a time machine? Seriously, it's like 30 years old and it rings completely true with today's situation.
>>95
I always wonder how ignorant people expose their stupidity with such ease.
I have some news for you, the world isn't limited to America and Africa, and actually south east Asia and the golden crescent pump out massive amounts of drugs, which are trafficked to Europe through countless means.
I don't see how this explains the lack of a crack epidemic in Europe. We have plenty of cocaine, just not crack, which if I am not mistaken in the case of the US is not made in South America but in the US itself.
Name:
Anonymous2008-04-02 19:55
>>98
This is because America will always do things better than Europe.
Europe likes cocaine.
America likes cocaine.
America finds a way to make it stronger, faster, better.
A 10 second google can disprove you. Troll harder. http://www.emcdda.europa.eu/stats07/main
More heroine enters europe than cocaine. Also I thought you said earlier Europe didn't have a drug problem.
>>97 Answer: I have a full set of teeth and they're all natural, so I don't know which one you're referring to. However, since they all get brushed at the same time, my answer applies: Daily.
I have to interject a correspondent answer here about the Europe/US drug thing. Europeans just don't treat drug abuse as a big legal problem like we do here in Butthurt America. Largely, drug abuse in Europe is treated sanely as a MEDICAL ISSUE. Instead of spending so much cultural energy criminalizing drugs, they seek more social solutions like medical treatment. Of course, they are a more advanced civilization for things like that, since they have a base of socialized medicine from which to even address drugs as medical problems, not criminal ones.
As a barbaric and regressive society, the US lacks socialized medicine (well, the official form; the UNOFFICIAL form we use is to wait, then get very sick, then end up in the hospital in emergency care, then bankrupt out of the bill ... but I digress). Lacking such a sane basis for citizenship and culture, it seems to logically follow that ANY drug abuse or even use in the USA is going to run into some very harsh measures. That creates a very hostile environment on both sides of the drug issue. That then seems to lead to the extremism we also see on both sides.
It's up to the US to stop treating drug abuse and use as criminal problems, and to start treating them as minor problems mostly related to medical care. Then all those cops can spend their time looking for REAL criminals ... you know, the people who cheat people, hurt people, and kill people. Decriminalizing drugs would also vastly decrease their cost and the concomitant criminal fraternity that goes along with it. In fact, we'd save so much on law enforcement that we can then downsize our police forces.
(Now we must cue the usual butthurt Ugly American who will scream incessantly against drugs and socialized medicine.)
Name:
Anonymous2008-04-03 2:31
>>103
That doesn't explain why crack cocaine is virtually unheard of in Europe
Name:
Anonymous2008-04-03 3:11
>>104
It's really quite simple, Old World blacks don't act like fucking apes every minute of the day. American blacks are too damn stupid to realize that shit is horrible.
Name:
Anonymous2008-04-03 8:28
>>90
Because Europe doesn't have as many niggers. Rich white people use coke, niggers smoke rocks.
Name:
Anonymous2008-04-03 8:48
>>103
Your last paragraph exposes you as a FailCream.
You do know that people addicted to drugs and alcohol commit the majority of crimes in the U.S., right?
So by your logic we shouldn't punish any of these people.
Yeah, that's a good idea.
>>107
You remind me of far too many Americans who are unable to construct a logical argument to save their lives.
When you commit an act of a true criminal nature, it's still a crime and thus actionable on that basis. WHY you did the crime is irrelevant. You stole stuff or beat someone, and so you'll have to be prosecuted for it.
That is unlike drugs, which are just something you do to yourself. THOSE should not be illegal at all.
And as for the addicts committing so many crimes, you'll note that there is a fairly direct relation with the high costs of drug addiction. By making drugs illegal, you increase their costs and drive the users into a criminal trade by default. Criminal acts are very likely to follow. In contrast, a European-like model of MEDICAL treatment of drug addiction creates a far more docile addict population. They spend less on drugs and aren't pushed into the criminal fraternity in the first place.
Of course, nothing I just said made any sense to you, since you just can't imagine (in the full blossoming of your Ugly Americanism) allowing an addict to take their drug of choice without being seized by a cop for that very act. In short, you just don't know what you're talking about, since you're talking about how you WANT things to be, and not how things ARE.
The simple fact is that taking drugs is well within the scope of personal liberty. We should allow people to have that liberty. And if they abuse the rest of us for whatever reason, then we have cops and courts and jails waiting for them ... and we'll have plenty of capacity, since by making drugs legal we free up a lot of that capacity and toss out the nonviolent "drug offenders" who fill our jails.
Name:
Anonymous2008-04-03 21:13
QUESTION:
RedCream, you seem to fancy yourself a smart person, good with money and all that. But a lot of your posts seem to imply that you are a member of the middle class. Perhaps my assumption is wrong. But if it is right... why? Shouldn't an intelligent individual such as yourself, with all kind of answers to everything, have risen a bit higher in the world? Did the j00s keep you down?
Name:
Anonymous2008-04-03 22:09
Did Dr Dre kill Eazy E?
Name:
Anonymous2008-04-04 2:00
>>108
Why do you take the time to write a wall of text in response to 4 shitty sentences by an obvious troll?
Name:
Anonymous2008-04-04 2:05
>>111
Redcream is an autist, he can't tell the difference between trolls and serious posts.
>>109
Why do you assume that intelligence must be correspondent with monetary wealth? Where did that assumption of yours come from?
What it takes to collect together money in this society is a massive offense to my morals. Basically put, rich people are vicious swine and I want nothing to do with them or their methods.
If you find that you can attain wealth while remaining a person I'd hang around, then good for you. However, I doubt that that's the case. The people with money are uniformly disgusting creatures who would cheat anyone for a dollar. I don't hang around the lower-caste criminals, and as well neither the higher-caste ones. One steals with a gun, and the other steals with a pen. Both are thieves.
Name:
Anonymous2008-04-04 7:03
>>113
except a lower class takes with out your consent. You give your money to a higher class thief.
Name:
Anonymous2008-04-04 11:23
>>113
What exactly is so despicable about getting a job that pays a lot of money/staring a business/making wise investments?
I suspect that you have an unreasonable grudge against the rich. Maybe it's jealousy, but I bet rather than that you've just read a handful of articles about how some CEO fucked over the employees at his company. And of course that shit gets played up in the media to the nth degree so it seems like a huge problem, but really that's a tiny exception blow way out of proportion.
>>115
It's more than a handful of articles. The economic system in the USA is full of corporations that REFUSE to obey the law. Look at Skilling's upcoming appeal process. He's going to try to use the defense that although he did commit illegal financial acts, he only did so to save the company, and did not personally profit. (That's straight from the wiki.) That's how bold these fuckers are!
As for what the media is playing up, enjoy your nearly worthless currency. The elites (i.e. corporations merged with government -- hey, didn't you fuckers say you wanted a FREE MARKET?!?!) have been debasing that currency specifically to bail out their Wall Street buddies. So, if anything, this hasn't been played up ENOUGH.
Money is OK. But when people try to accumulate it so fast that it gets destroyed, should earn ALL of our ire. And skip the "comrade" bullshit -- your beloved "Capitalist" government is pouring bailout money all over your financial industry. Smells like fucking Socialism to be, "comrade". Apparently, it's only Communism if the POOR PEOPLE benefit from it. When the RICH PEOPLE need their bond losses (a la Bear Sterns) covered, you stupid fucks start crying for Big Mommy Government to come in and open the milk spigots for THEN.
You're just another American asshole who doesn't even understand what a conflict of interest is. Your soup lines are coming. So sign another fucking mortgage, since that's all you dipshits really understand. Maybe you can monetize your loser story for some laughing Chinese Schadenfreude-ists.
Name:
Anonymous2008-04-04 12:36
>>116
This doesn't matter. Let the whole world laugh at America's economy, let's see how many chinks and euros will be laughing when the Rapture comes.
Name:
Anonymous2008-04-04 13:38
>>116
Oh you are one presumptuous mother fucker. And one who can't stay on topic either. I never mentioned this bullshit about the bailout (and I do think it's bullshit, but that's for another topic).
In addition to that you assume that I'll be hanging out in a soup line....because I enjoy signing mortgages all the time, right? How very wrong you are. I have no debts. All the money I earn goes toward making me more money. But this too has nothing to do with your apparent disdain for big business.
You cry and piss and moan about how sooooo many business are tied up in illegal practices and unethical behavior. We'll you're wrong. MOST companies follow the laws, but you never hear about them because that's not interesting to anyone. You're hatred for businesses is completely unfounded. The fact of the matter is those big companies and corporations employ A LOT of people. Without them we'd all be poor farmers.
It is clear to me that you remain middle class because you are too stupid and foolish to do any better and that all your butthurt business bashing is just a cover for your inability to attain wealth.
>>118
So you define a persons worth by how much money they make? Mozart and Beethoven where both very poor.
In fact many of the greatest artists in history have been poor.
Now these days all artists are spoiled upper class wankers. Gee I wonder why modern art sucks?
The fact of the matter is corporations exploit people, not employ them.
I dont like Redcream that much, but I applaud him for not being a slave.
Your a willing slave to the corporate machine, how comfortable you are doesnt change this.
Also making money doesnt have much to do with intelligence anyway. Its well know that money makes more money. Its hardest to make money when you havent got much.
Capitalism is amoral and anti socal. The more power corperations have over the country the more shity it is. That is why dispite the USA being the richest country in the world is has the biggest gap between the rich and poor, and the highest crime. Also its got the most ignorant religious fanatics in the western world. This is because the greedy rich are not willing to pay taxs towards the poor. What they do pay goes towards weapons, and most of the money comes from the middle and lower classes to bail the rich out when they get into trouble.
>>120
Why are you bothering? >>118 thinks we'd be "poor farmers" without the ass-rapings routinely handed out by the corporations. He never realizes that farmers aren't poor, and the historical ones in our tradition of liberty (the yeoman) were very well off.
We don't have to choose between bread lines and Crony Capitalism. But Mr. Butthurt (>>118) apparently can't even remember huge scandals that aren't even a decade old (ref. the corporate scandals marked around 2002). As soon as these revelations reach the public, he and his sick kind are busy yawning and dismissing and obliterating the rational conclusions about the event.
Like all lying trolls, >>118 has "no debt" (so apparently is not in the majority -- apparently the majority (mortgage holders, credit-card holders, car lease holders, etc) never post on the Internet) and has his money make him more money ... which just means he's another Gen-X or Boomer speculator, and his money is just tied up in risky outlets, and he's nowhere near as wealthy as he thinks. Bear fucking Sterns claimed it was fairly well off, too, before people started to actually FIND OUT what it's so-called investments were worth. That's the position that >>118 is in now; he hasn't MARKED TO MARKET yet. So he's free to lie his damn-fool head right the fuck off.
The corporations are busily merging their interests with the US government. They are essentially writing the laws, now. The excesses barely revealed by 2002 have been dampened. Fuck, all that "restatement" brouhaha is now NORMAL, which makes the Sarbanes-Oxley "changes" just more corporate BULLSHIT to keep us living in denial until they end up owning everything.
>>118 Dotcoms. Enron. Arthur Andersen. Worldcom. Tyco. LTCM. No-bid contracting for Iraq. You failed immediately. The accounts of corporate malfeasance revealed by 2002 make you MOAR THAN WRONG. How are you able to type out those LIES with a straight face?
Name:
Anonymous2008-04-05 5:53
>>121
Hmmmmm, all those corporate scandals and I can still seem to make more money than the year before.
Just admit it, you're not smart enough to make money when the market is good OR bad.
Your all right Redcream. Apart from being a Gun nut that is lulz.
Name:
Anonymous2008-04-05 9:22
GHUURRRR DURRRR LETS PRIVATIZE EVERYTHING
Name:
Anonymous2008-04-05 12:08
>>124
Socialism was designed to be bullshit! Just kill yourself already!
Name:
Anonymous2008-04-05 15:35
118 Reporting,
>>120
I don't ever recall bringing up the value of art and artists. It's true that musical and artistic genius is often overlooked for such a long time that the artist remains poor. But even then, having a poor life full of suffering does not make one a good artist. At the most it it inspires and gives the artist a window of reference from which to work. Oh and btw, your opinion of modern art is just that, an opinion. I highly doubt you even pay attention to the art world.
But that's still unimportant because my initial question was not about RedCream's artistic ability. I inquired as to why his "vast knowledge" of money management (which you will see throughout the forum) had left him in the middle class. But hey, way to go with your comparison. Maybe comparing APPLES AND ORANGES can be a new form of performance art.
>>121
Yes, I'm sure our forefathers did pretty well FOR THEIR TIME. But this is the fucking 21st century. Do you honestly think society would be all that great living on subsistence farms? Oh I'm sure we'd all be better off without the industrial revolution. None of that annoying electricity to light homes and computer screens. That shit is just evil and horrible. And fuck this stupid refrigeration, it makes my food last too long!
You know, sometimes I just wish I could spend everyday from sun up to sun down doing back breaking labor. It's just a richer life.
You must be absolutely insane to not realize that industrialization has improved the quality of life for everyone. Even the poorest of people in America are better off than the poorest people in African countries. Complain as much as you like, but your quality of life is much higher than your grandfather's.
Now about Enron, Arthur Andersen, Worldcom, Tyco, LTCM, No-bid contracting for Iraq and the dotcoms:
You've listed five (5) specific companies that went rotten. FIVE. FIVE companies out of HUNDREDS, maybe even thousands. OH NO the whole system is broken!!! Now, I'm sure 5 is a huge number for your preindustrial obsessed little mind, but it is nothing in the larger scheme of things. Yes, some people got a raw deal when those companies imploded. It's very unfortunate, but that's life. Not everyone can be guaranteed an amazing job that'll never go away. And the people who had their entire futures tied up in those companies' stocks were foolish for not diversifying. All your eggs in one basket is never a good idea.
There were massive dotcom failures because too many people tried to take advantage of the internet without knowing what they were doing. It was a totally new avenue of business and people thought it would be a gravy train without doing much work. Companies were bound to fail.
As for the no-bid contracts, that foolishness is due to a certain president being a dumb fuck. And as shady and unethical as it is, it's not the end of the world. We can only hope the next president is better (though I have my doubts).
>>121
Troll, I am not. I'm actually quite human. And my money is quite solid and safe. Only about 20% of my money is ever tied up in speculative endeavors. The details are too boring, but I'll you this: It's good to own land.
No counter-argument? I guess it's off a cliff for you!
Name:
Anonymous2008-04-06 6:01
What objects do you shove up your ass? Recently I slipped a habanero pepper into my rectum. It was quite a rush!
Name:
Anonymous2008-04-06 7:15
>>128
I'm not a socialist, bush is a socialist lol
It's funny because your original retarded statement needed no rebuttal (BAWWWWWWWWW KILL YOURSELF BAWWWWWWWWWWWWW), but you are too retarded to notice, so I won't be shoving this one to your face, dear retarded loser.
Name:
Anonymous2008-04-06 16:15
>>130
>It's funny because your original retarded statement needed no rebuttal
It did need a rebuttal because, unfortunately, logic is the only method of determining reality and if there is no logical counter-argument to the series of facts I stated then you have no choice but to assume it is all true. I will take this quote as an admission of guilt.
I am sitting here inviting criticism and you are failing to deliver, we are both aware it is you who is "BBAAWWing".
Name:
Anonymous2008-04-06 16:37
>>131
It's funny because it's self contradictory, and of course again you're too stupid to notice. It is clear of course who is crying, someone who posted UR SO RONG WHY DON'T YOU KILL YOURSELF!!!!!! as an argument. Very sad, your level of intelligence is...
Bush is more accurately defined as a state socialist. I do not believe he supports crony capitalism, just the idea the government should step in at every occasion even when their actions are not representative of fairness but tyranny of the majority. You guys should read up on libertarian principles.
>>126
So your money works for you, and yet you still think your smarter than other people?
Name:
Anonymous2008-04-10 14:27
>>144
I'd say I'm smarter than some people, though I'm not so arrogant as to say I'm the smartest person in the world. Anyway, it's not like my money just suddenly appeared and placed itself in the avenues that allowed it to grow. I had to use my mind to acquire capital and figure out what to do with it.
Name:
Anonymous2008-04-10 14:28
Ummmm...YEAH, Cleetus. That's what smart people do. DUH!!
Name:
Anonymous2008-04-10 15:17
>>146
Don't get snippy just because you're poor judgment keeps you drowning in debt.
Name:
Anonymous2008-04-10 15:40
>>147
I have no debt. My portfolio is diversified and I make money for just doing nothing. In other words, I make my money work for me.
Comment >>146 was directed at >>144.
>>150
100k to start if it's worthy. That would be from my slush fund.
Enjoy MY wealth!
Name:
Anonymous2008-04-11 10:59
Another successful thread by redcream
Name:
Anonymous2008-04-11 10:59
>>152
I intend to spend it on champagne and furnshing my apartment then filing for bankruptcy so I don't have to repay anything. The state allows me to do this, and voters who believe they are sticking it to the man by supporting state socialism so special thanks to all the leftist idiots out there!
Name:
Anonymous2008-04-11 18:42
RedCream, why have you made this thread then abandoned it?