Conservatives are the biggest tards ever

they're skeptical about evolution, climate change, the situation in Iraq, resonable gun control, the possibility of recession in the economy, and tolerating gays and hippies.

the also all have that bloated white guy look.

Not all of them. Some embrace Evolution, most don't think Climate Change is anthropogenic (you're right there), some can see there is a big problem in Iraq and the pretenses of going to Iraq (although they wouldn't be saying that now if everything was OK there... same with Democrats save for 10% of them).

Almost all of them don't support gun control although they think individual responsibility should trump Government Intervention, I think that argument is sketchy but it works if everyone was responsible 100% of the time. Recessions, they don't give a damn. They're all about supply side. A few tolerate gays and a few tolerate Hippies.

Yes, all of them are bloated white guys with cash.

thank you

/thread

>>1
The Second Amendment states quite clearly that Americans have the right to keep and bear arms.  Unlike most of that document, the right to keep and bear arms is AFFIRMED.  Being the law of the land, such an affirmed right cannot be constitutionally countered by state or local laws.

So, what gun control do you think is "reasonable" when they keep adding more and more -- unconstitutional, I might add -- restrictions on gun ownership and use?  After all, you have to right to speak freely on the streets of your city and town ... but somehow, you don't have the right to bear arms there?

There's a term for a person like you:  GUN GRABBER.  You like to make up fantasy rationales for stopping Americans from making use of their right to keep and bear arms.

>>4
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.


A well regulated Militia


well regulated


the right to keep and bear arms isn't being infringed if i ban fully automatic rifles from schools

FAIL.  You're indulging in Gun Grabber Myth #14.

The term "regulated" from that era meant to "call up and equip".  That means the Second Amendment noted the right of the government to do so.  HOWEVER, that still cannot be construed to mean that YOU LOSE THE RIGHT TO KEEP AND BEAR ARMS when a militia is not under regulation.  Do you lose the right to speak freely when the government has no need of it?  Do you lose the right to speak freely without first applying for a permit to do so?  Do you lose the right to speak freely when you're not currently exercising it?  NO, NO, and fucking NO.  So, why do you gun grabbers assume the people (who are the militia from historical definition) of the USA lose the right to keep and bear arms?

Gun bans are ALL unconstitutional.  The US citizen has the right -- as well expressed from the Constitution and all other formative documents -- to arm himself as he sees fit.  The gayfaggotry of the urbanites really started all this ban crap, by thinking they could restrict citizens from walking armed down the street.  So, yes, you have the right to take your fully automatic rifle into that school.  The teachers, administrators, and other students also have that right.  If you feel like "starting some shit", then they being so armed, can stop you in short order.  The VA-Tech incident may have been caused by Cho, but the ordeal only continued since the school UNCONSTITUTIONALLY banned firearms from the citizens who were on campus.

>>6
yeh if cho went to a college in tenn. and tried that shit hed been shot to hell...thed all pull out thier shot guns and them hicks would shot him till his unreconizable

>>6 "Gun bans are ALL unconstitutional."

so felons should have the right to own guns?

>>8
Most conservatives now support background checks, just FYI.  The NRA supports background checks and keeping the guns out of the hands of criminals - they just want to preserve the rights of lawful people.  The Second Amendment is still an individual right though.

The Dept. of Justice agrees that the 2A is an individual right:
http://archive.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2004/12/21/104408.shtml
http://www.usdoj.gov/olc/secondamendment2.pdf

A Federal Court recently ruled that the 2A is an individual right:
http://www.cato.org/pub_display.php?pub_id=8128
http://pacer.cadc.uscourts.gov/docs/common/opinions/200703/04-7041a.pdf

>>8
YES.  Past the 3/5ths bullshit -- which was amended away -- the Constitution made ZERO provisions for "second class citizenry" of any kind.  Punishments were mentioned on within the scope of trial.  Once a "felon" leaves the justice system he should be OUT, and have all the rights and responsibilities of other citizens.

Since people like you are gayfailers when it comes to comprehending the American Republic, I'm sure you didn't understand a fucking word I just said.  Felons, pedos, domestics -- these are all modern inventions of that terrible mental retardation known as LIBERALISM.  Liberalism prods people into canceling large portions of the Constitution.  Conservatism essentially cancels the other half.  Hence, what this country needs is a Constitution Party instead of the two gayfail parties that now dominate that sick thing known as the American mind.

>>8
If someone is too dangerous to own a gun, don't you think he should probably just be in jail anyways to protect the public? If he isn't too dangerous to own a gun, then he should be freed and get his gun rights back. 

>>10


I have to say for once I agree with you.

the only reasonable gun control is no gun control, and hippies are retarded. leftards are just as idiotic as reich-wingers.

>>10
pedophile

>>13
Well, not entirely "no".  If the government would actually attempt to regulate (i.e. equip, train and deploy) the militia, we'd be a lot better off.  The common citizen should strive to be fairly well practiced in the use of his firearms, but too few actually do it.  Of course, being trained in the use of your firearms by a government source would be too much like the same government saying it's OK for you to even be armed in the first place ... which is why the government assiduously avoids such things.  Any equipping and training is reserved for the para-militarism of the government, in which classes of people are REMOVED from the general population and are indoctrinated into supporting the government, NOT the law of the USA and NOT the people of same.  Of course, I'm talking about police, military and all the security services (CIA NSA FBI etc.).  The government equips and trains these folks but does NOT allow them to identify with the common populace.  Also, equipping is specious in those cases too, since you largely can't keep the equipment as an actual citizen militiaman should.  Note well that as each war is over, the government gets more and more militant about confiscating the issued weapons from the citizens who fought in it.

>>14
You're a complete fuckass.  Advocating for the rights of the accused and jailed is NOT subscribing to the same offenses that caused such accusations and jailing in the first place.  You may as well say we should try lawyers for defending clients.  You fuckface!  Eat a dick and die by fire!

RedCream i picture you as a 47 year old man who works in a supermarket

>>16

I picture you as someone who can't argue.

He's the only guy who takes this shit seriously.

>>17

why do you think i'm arguing idiot?

>>16
Wrong age and career.  Guess again.  At any rate, are you fishing for an age and career that would somehow validate my opinions?  If that's true, then what would a 47-yr-old grocery worker say that you'd consider valid?

(Class warfare is alive and well in America.  Meanwhile, the dolts continue to insist that it's not, which is a pure PR move while the arrange to bankrupt the entire working class.)

>>19
"why do you think i'm an arguing idiot?"

FIXED.

I hate those fucking Conservatives. Always after the Jews and niggers. Those doochebag crackers.

>>16
What's wrong with working in a supermarket?

>>21


wrong Conservatives love jews and hate niggers. liberals hate jews and love niggers.

>>6 So I should be able to run out and buy a high-powered sniper rifle, then, right?

>>25
Yes, of course.  How the fuck can you act in a militia capacity if you can't obtain, keep and practice with a sniper rifle?

That's the basic problem with you Jew-Dem-Libs; you think that since something is dangerous, that is must be banned.  You think safety is the overriding concern of American civilization.  You think that the Constitution (particularly the 2nd Amendment) no longer applies since today's world is "too different".  Etc.  In short, you're fucking NUTS.

Holy ahit! RedCream believes in Class War!

I thought you were libertarian!

I do have to agree that I don't like most Conservationists. If they are to right wing, you get people like on shelleytherepublican.com :P. I find specifically the lack of understanding with homosexuals disturbing. this is reflected in my yuri amv: http://youtube.com/watch?v=zoWhhP_OHuY

My girlfriend was Bi and dated a girl before I meet her. She got beat up once because of it. The guy who beat her was arrested and put in jail for battery, I made sure of that. She died not long ago from brain cancer.

>>27
GTFO

lol conservatards