Honestly I don't like CP... However, I don't like the way how it is portrayed as the true evil of society. Especially, the GOP has a long history of protecting pedophiles just like the Vatican.
They clearly understand the context, but I think people are using it for political purposes and I think they understand that too," = Former Republican Senator Rick Santorum on pedophilia
and the paradigm for speculating liberal or conservative realms is so outdated and old and useless and not practical for today's standard.
Name:
Anonymous2007-01-18 18:07
I should say if CP and pedophilia is true evil to the society, it looks like it is escapism than dealing it in an honest perspective.
Name:
Anonymous2007-01-18 21:09
If the child is consenting then I think it should be ok. The problem is when can they be considered old enough to "consent". Invariably the sleaze bags who make it would coerce some into it. This is the same problem with NAMBLA. So, I think it is better just to outlaw it all together, and maybe lower the age of consent to 16 (that's what it is where I live anyway).
Children are idiots but I did know some kids who did like sex-play (namely, me). I think children should be allowed to do things to each other but not anyone older than, I don't know, 13 maybe.
Name:
Anonymous2007-01-19 0:54
>>9
No, children are naive. Naive children =/= idiots. You're an idiot, idiot.
You gotta hate the politics. And I totally agree. Anti-pedophilia just becomes a mere political dynamic that doesn't have any meaning. After decades of anti-pedo agenda shows that it is not efficient in the first place.
I think anybody at any age can manipulate people.
>>10
The main difference is naive looks into positive side while idiot is negative. Same core semantics but different way of using. Eventually, the two words are different.
Name:
Anonymous2007-01-19 23:13
Semantic faggotry aside, it's a somewhat interesting subject. How exactly did we go from CP being a strange but acceptable fetish to it being, according to mainstream culture, a great evil?
It's not just the mainstream, either. Ask anyone, even the most liberal hippy in the country, and he'll tell you that he accepts everybody, every single person, except for racists and pedophiles. Those two groups are special to the point that mousy, gentle girls exclaim that they should be tortured to death. So how did we get from there to here, anyways?
Name:
Anonymous2007-01-20 2:39
>>13
The more you forbid pedophilia, the more it is enriched as some kind of desire. That's the same as drug culture portrayed in the society. Now people think that humorously or not drugs are cool and they actually want to try drugs.
But I'm suspecting that in some decades pedophilia will be mainstream in a positive way. But pedophilia is already a mainstream in a negative way for a very long time especially for the past few recent years.
And I didn't argue for pedophilia btw. Bitter reality though.
And we as whole are already sexualizing youth for a long time and we cannot revert this.
Name:
Anonymous2007-01-20 4:41
.....But pedophilia is already a mainstream in a negative way for a very long time especially for the past few recent years......
OH yes. Taht is so true. anti pedo feelings is only stacking up and it will some day be collapsed.
Name:
Anonymous2007-01-20 5:03
>>14
Pedophilia is concept of 20th century. Before that people didn't ever considered it to be issue. Even age of consent had originally nothing to do with sex with children seen as bad thing. It was made originally to protect girls from bad marriages and pre-marital sex. Besides first age of consent laws placed the age around like 10. I don't actually know what was the great turning point. I know child porn was legal not so long time ago, but the term pedophilia and framework for witch hunt dates to older times. Seemingly to late 1800s. The culprit in the end seems to be psychology, but I could be wrong. It seems to be damn hard to find out about history of these things. It's almost like somebody is trying to repress that knowledge.
I don't advocate adult-child sex, but I will not stand silent when history is forgotten and lies are told instead.
Name:
Anonymous2007-01-20 5:22
If CP consisted of nothing but nude children, it wouldn't be so bad. But lots of it depicts underage kids being raped, brutalized, etc...
Name:
Anonymous2007-01-20 7:56
>>17
It's same thing with adult porn. Only difference is legality.
Name:
Anonymous2007-01-20 8:43
>>18
A large percent of all child porn shows children against their will, or at least being influenced into "consenting". Adult porn is usually either solo and nude or two consenting adults who are mature enough to make a decision about something like that. Also, do you really think a little kid could handle a full grown cock up their tight orifices comfortably? No.
What happens during someone's childhood can affect their personality and ultimately change who they are for the rest of their lives. A child who is raped and/or exploited by child pornographers will be more likely to get involved in violence, more likely to commit suicide, abuse controlled substance, rape others, etc...
There is more than just a legal difference. If your dick didn't control your pathetic pedophilic brain you might admit that.
Name:
Anonymous2007-01-20 9:24
>>19
First of all I'm not pedophile in traditional sense, but one could say I'm auto-pedophile. I have zero sexual interest in children. I'm interested in being little boy to older men. I know child pornography is very ugly and harmful business. I don't advocate legalising production or distribution of CP, but I think banning possession and witch hunts are overkill. In the end they're just pictures and videos. You can't make those horrible acts undone or save those kids by outlawing them. Also sex with children isn't always harmful. I know actual people including girls that have positive childhood sexual experiences with adults. Personally I have very positive experiences too, but not with adults although I always wanted to do it with some kind old man.
Name:
Anonymous2007-01-20 9:36
>>20
Paying for child porn will encourage child pornographers to make more.
Name:
Anonymous2007-01-20 9:45
>>21
Maybe, but have you considered that then when customer isn't breaking any laws, but seller/maker is it removes the typical trust that such transactions have. Anyone can buy CP and then bust the producer just for kicks. Then it would open possibility of pedos working together with police to bust producers for rewards and such. I know the producers are mostly located in countries where it's legal, but if we really want to stop CP we have to go against producers and not random people who download or buy it.
Name:
Anonymous2007-01-20 11:56
>>22
Anyone who is involved with child porn, even if they "only" download some, are part of the problem and do deserve punishment. I think chemical castrastion would be a fair way to solve this, don't you?
Name:
Anonymous2007-01-20 13:16
I've got the answer. Make all CP public domain.
Name:
Anonymous2007-01-20 13:31
>>19
Then we have a solution. Make CP legal and make sure that the kids are not abused under guidence and supervision. Make a better enviornment so there is no problem.
Like adult porn were just like that when it was illegal. People have to abuse the porn actors and actresses in order to accomplish the sex tapes. Now adult porns are legal and we don't see any problem with this.
>>23
One problem with castration is... it doesn't completely surpress the sexual urge. Because castration cannot surpress the mental urge for sex. And there is the binge and purge cycle. How will you going to deal with these?
Do you think that abuse can be resolved with abuse? It only makes more problems at the end.
Name:
Anonymous2007-01-20 13:33
"Do you think that abuse can be resolved with abuse? It only makes more problems at the end."
an eye for an eye make the world go blind. retaliation only makes things worse.
Name:
Anonymous2007-01-20 14:17
but an eye for an eye keeps me from taking your head!
Absolutely ridiculous. What if the kid wants to be a politician or something that depends on their reputation someday? Children shouldn't be allowed to make life-changing decisions.
What an ageist you are. Is this some assumption that all adults can make their own positive decision no matter what? Oh please. This is not 19th century.
The difference between adults and children are merely a social norm. Not human nature.
So what's wrong with >>25 saying this? I rather prevent abuse than saying this with moral panic.
Agree. Resolving harm with harm? That's like psychopathic mentality.
Name:
Anonymous2007-01-20 18:12
The greatest problem with anti-pedophile mentality is... it breeds more and more closet pedos.
I see antis really want more closet pedos in the society if they really want to uphold anti-pedophile mentality. I may hate pedophiles, but I do know that this kind of mentality is not the solution.
Name:
Anonymous2007-01-20 19:20
>>30
I pick preventing abuse too. In fact, how can society totally stop pedophilia? It has been like this for a very long time and it doesn't stop at all.
>>31
Absolute fear encourages more covert ways to avoid fear.
Name:
Anonymous2007-01-21 1:02
fuck dem kiddies until they bleed
Name:
Anonymous2007-01-21 1:08
exterminate pedos, that way their genes will be removed forever and the problem will be solved
Name:
Anonymous2007-01-21 1:11
I have radical solution. Make CP possession legal, but make production and commercial distribution into offenses worth of death penalty. Also make child abuse and rape into offense worth of death penalty. That way we kill all the people who abuse kids and it makes pedos to consider whether to stay way from kids or die. Only problem are cases when abuse is not abuse as someone said there are people who have had positive sexual relations in their childhood and their partners could be falsely prosecuted if word got out.
Name:
Anonymous2007-01-21 1:12
>>34
Human sexuality is not genetic. There is no pedo gene or gay gene. It's all about upbringing.