Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon.

Pages: 1-4041-8081-

"From Israel with love"

Name: Anonymous 2006-07-24 22:21

Name: Anonymous 2006-07-24 22:56

Sick, sick, sick...

Name: Anonymous 2006-07-25 0:20

>>2 Yeah, it made me feel like throwing up.

Name: Anonymous 2006-07-25 0:45

>>2
>>3
Lol, sandniggers on my 4chan. :()

Name: Anonymous 2006-07-25 1:21

They were coaxed into it by 12 reporters after spending days in a bunker

Name: Anonymous 2006-07-25 2:47

Name: Anonymous 2006-07-25 2:49

Name: Anonymous 2006-07-25 3:12

hilarity: muslims kill eachother by the thousands, they kill children and women, they blow up civilians and everyone cheers

and then they whine about israel killing a few when bombing hezbollah

OH LAWD IS THAT SUM HYPOCRISY

Name: Anonymous 2006-07-25 3:38

>>8
Way to generalize.  There are plenty of peaceful muslim people in the world.  Some even live here in the USA, as patriotic, law-abiding citizens, just like your average Christian American, but they are Muslims.  They aren't exactly rare either, look around.  You typically see them doing the usual, ordinary, everyday shit your average american does... shopping at the supermarket, driving around, going to school, whatever..

So you apparently don't mind if a few innocent muslim kids get blown to bits by Israeli bombs, long as a handful of radicals who were different people entirely, and all too likely had no connection whatever to the children killed, outside of the fact that they both followed the same religion, decided to blow themselves and a busload of people up in a suicide bombing in the past. 

Essentially, you view Muslims collectively, rather than individually, and to exact vengeance on a few innocent Muslims who had no corollation whatever to a select few Muslim terrorists who decided to bomb something the previous day, is just fine with you, since a few unrelated individuals blew up some Israelis in the past.

Name: Anonymous 2006-07-25 5:08

>>9
Maybe the innocent muslims should GET THE FUCK AWAY FROM HEZBOLLAH AREAS. You know, kind of like IDF told them days before this began. More like they were unwanted kids who were left behind for the express purpose of getting some much needed sympathy from the west's Left. For dirt poor islamic fanatics who can churn out babies at supersonic speeds sacrificing your children for the cause isn't as unthinkable as for the enlightened west. I say this as someone who's spend two years in Egypt. THESE PEOPLE ARE FREAKING CRAZY

Name: Anonymous 2006-07-25 8:21

<I>So you apparently don't mind if a few innocent muslim kids get blown to bits by Israeli bombs, long as a handful of radicals who were different people entirely, and all too likely had no connection whatever to the children killed, outside of the fact that they both followed the same religion, decided to blow themselves and a busload of people up in a suicide bombing in the past.</i>

Don't mind in the least.

Name: anti-chan 2006-07-25 8:29

>>10

It's not that easy to displace yourself, your family and your whole life at the beck and call of an illegally invading force that the rest of the world is too pussy to do anything about.

If (generally speaking, since you LOVE generalities) the region wasn't as unstable as it is now (due to foreign policy) - the number of children those countries have wouldn't make a fucking difference. The problem is that people like you lamblast these places as terrorist haven's-- then you don't want to send real aid (the kind that rebuilds infrastructure).

Children have killed, killed themselves for causes for literally centuries. To make such a big fucking deal out of it now is ultimate failure of the highest calibur, and shows a interest in ignoring history.

Collectively, the middle east might be feeling like either way the future is fucked, men die when these children are young and in turn they want to die. They have nothing to lose as far as they're concerned. So cut it with the heavy-handed faggot-like wailing about OH NOES CHILD BLOWS UP.

No one who understands the nature of the underclass or the nature of war itself is weeping about that shit. There are bigger ideals at stake. Pretty soon, YOUR kids might have to shotgun their way through the local police.

Name: Anonymous 2006-07-25 9:07

Soldiers have been writing stuff on bombs since bombs exist.

But do they have to invite children to do it? What's wrong with those fags?

Name: Anonymous 2006-07-25 9:35

Jesus christ anti-chan, this isn't blind ww2 bombing, it's surgical strikes against known targets. i.e. "please move 200m to the left to avoid getting blown to pieces"

Name: anti 2006-07-25 11:42

>>14


Dude, all I'm saying is that we can't get all pissed, indignant or even surprised that kids are doing this type of shit (blowing themselves up, writing on bombs). Israel is caught up in such a wave of nationalism right now, it's not even fucking funny, how easily these people could turn Nazi. The only thing Israel is doing is performing a long, drawn out, slow, meandering genocide of Muslims.

On the Muslim side, fuck the religious aspect for a second and realize that blowing yourself up and crashing planes into shit are the actions of desperate, desperate, POOR, POOR people. You people think that this behavior is somehow prevailent in Islamic culture but IT'S NOT. It's a reaction to poverty.

This is the way humans behave at war. You want to debate the reasons they're fighting? Go ahead. But to call into question, their bravery, their sacrifices, their cheerleading tactic (public spelling bees- on bombs) is just unadulterated lose with a dash of severe fail. There's no honor, or whatever in war.

Think I'm wrong?

Tell it to the dead civilians.

Name: Anonymous 2006-07-25 11:46

>>15
The Muslims fail for thinking that blowing Israelis up will somehow improve their life. In fact, the more they do it, the shittier it will get for them. They need to dump this religious bullshit and do something constructive.

Name: Anonymous 2006-07-25 11:53

>>Dude, all I'm saying is that we can't get all pissed, indignant or even surprised that kids are doing this type of shit

Of course we can you fucking idiot. watch me

>>Israel is caught up in such a wave of nationalism right now

Israel wants its north to be habitable again (i.e. they want the rockets to quit raining on their heads). They want Hizbullah disarmed. They want their neighbors to quit calling for their death. They want PEACE. That's all they want you shitfuck.

>>On the Muslim side, fuck the religious aspect for a second and realize that blowing yourself up and crashing planes into shit are the actions of desperate, desperate, POOR, POOR people. You people think that this behavior is somehow prevailent in Islamic culture but IT'S NOT. It's a reaction to poverty.

No suburban white fuck, there is poverty EVERYWHERE and the people work for a better life, not trying to kill some boggeyman (the jews). THE CAUSE IS ISLAM. IT'S A FUCKING DEATH CULTURE

Name: Anonymous 2006-07-25 12:22

>>17
Actually cause is Islam. Muslims keeps it running and funds it.

Name: Anonymous 2006-07-25 13:36

>>18
>>THE CAUSE IS ISLAM.
>Actually cause is Islam.

That was very insightful.

Name: Anonymous 2006-07-25 14:10

With jews you lose

Name: Anonymous 2006-07-25 14:16

>>17

You don't get peace by re-enforcing violence upon violence until you can't walk down a street in Beruit without running into someone who's relative or best friend or lover was killing by a "surgical strike (for peace!), you abominable dickbrain.

And I'm not white, you taintlicking, fuckwit. What you define as poverty doesn't compare to how shit is going in the middle east right now. At least we have poverty with infrastructure. The middle east has none and yes, it's our fault, so congrats, we're contributing to the "death culture" over there by making sure- THEIR FUTURE IS DEAD.

PRAISE DALLAH

Name: Anonymous 2006-07-25 14:29

>>21
The amount of Iraqi civilians killed by terrorism outstrips the amount killed by American friendly fire.

Name: Anonymous 2006-07-25 16:32

The point is is that the Israelis shouldn't be there in the first place.  They should have just moved to the USA or something instead of taking land from the Palestinians.

Name: Anonymous 2006-07-25 17:01

Jan Egeland, the UN humanitarian chief, on Monday noted that Hizbullah is responsible for the deaths of Lebanese civilians, as well as for those killed in Israel. Its fighters employ "cowardly blending... among women and children," in Egeland's formulation, which causes the deaths of hundreds of innocent Lebanese. Hizbullah bunkers, tunnels, rocket launchers and fighters are often located near or among civilians.

Name: Anonymous 2006-07-25 17:08

>>24
So they blend in with the crowds, Israel then bombs and shoots the crowd as a whole, killing a bunch of civilians, and you blame the Hezbollah? LOL

The fact stands:  Israelis shouldn't be there in the first place. 

Name: Xel 2006-07-25 17:19

>>25 "So they blend in with the crowds, Israel then bombs and shoots the crowd as a whole, killing a bunch of civilians, and you blame the Hezbollah? LOL" What in the intercourse is wrong with you? First of all, Israel is more productive and its citizens are more free, hence their right to exist is firm. Secondly the Israelis were there by 1945, but the palestinians refused any agreements. Thirdly, Israel is a buffer in a region defending your very notion of existence, and as long as they and the world recognize that their methods are vile and bloodstained, history will document how the Israelis adopted the same methods they complain were used against them.

Name: Anonymous 2006-07-25 17:25

>>25
300 dead in 12 days isn't exactly 'firing into crowds', is it?

Name: Anonymous 2006-07-25 17:30

>>26
Yeah, those freakin jews, firing rockets into Berlin and kidnapping poor germans.

Face it: any country in the world would do exactly what Israel is doing, except there'd be more dead civilians because most countries don't have the tech to land bombs precisely.

Name: Anonymous 2006-07-25 18:31

>>23
Agreed.

Name: Anonymous 2006-07-25 19:38

>>29
The faggot Mudslimes should've scared the Jews away while there still weren't enough to form a nation. But they waited until they got flooded and now they're bitching.

Actually, we should take a hint from that and throw the Muslims out of our countries before the same happens here.

Name: Anonymous 2006-07-26 2:30

Arab countries have 800 times the land mass of Israel. Clearly from this fact alone we can conclude that they bicker only for the sake of bickering.

Name: Anonymous 2006-07-26 4:22

>>30
>>31

This is pure rediculousness. There are actual issues here. All this Israel/Palestine bullshit would be over if we just sent infrastructure rebuilding aid to the region. The problem is that death and bombs are more cost effective and the ultimate problem there lies in the fact that you're not going to kill bunch of people's relatives and friends over and over and over and over again and somehow expect these people or ANY people to submit.

It seems to me that Israel and the West are trying to destabilize the region, not promote peace. If they really gave a shit, they would give the arabs so much aid that they would eventually take it on good faith. The idea that Muslims are irrational or whatever is steeped in racism and are the words of religious zealots (and their unwitting followers) who want to see other religions weak on the world stage or wiped out completely.

You people saying that you'd rather have Israeli Zionist Jews (SAND NIGGERS) than Islamic Fundies (STILL SAND NIGGERS) need to stop failing so hard and PICK UP A FUCKING TORAH. They both hate you.

The scientific argument is entirely fucking moot. Arabs and Islam gave us alot of science as well (Like fucking Algebra), but we're not giving them license to do whatever they want. Nazis gave us useful sience, but no one is saying "KILLING JEWS, IT'S ALLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLRRRRRIIIGHHHHHTTTT". In history it really don't matter what you've "contributed to mankind", which is an ENTIRELY subject matter (History decides what's useful in the end), what matters is ethics and honor. If you can't show that your people were capable of at the very least criticsizing and restraining itself in the name of these principles- then you ain't worth shit.

Name: Anonymous 2006-07-26 5:10

>>32
The Arabs have shown that they're willing to take the fight for their shitty land to people who don't have anything to do with it (Americans and Europeans). That alone is enough to never give them any support IMHO.

Name: Anonymous 2006-07-26 5:37

>>17
lols at irony of calling him a suburban white fuck.
It's not just a reaction to poverty, it's a reaction to genocide - I think in their position, with that kind of pressure and nothing to lose, alot of people would become suicide bomers.
>>33
Have nothing to do with it? Hardly. America offers Israel billions of dollars of aid (military or otherwise) and many European countries offer political support to Israel.

Name: Anonymous 2006-07-26 8:12

>>34
Because the existence of Israel is THE reason why Arabs live in such shitholes amirite? If Israel would suddenly cease to exist, Arab countries would become utopian paradises.

Name: Anonymous 2006-07-26 10:53

you know you lebanese should be lucky this happend in 2006, thanks to whoever create the precision bomb, if this happend in ww2 era, IDF  would carpet bombed the whole place, and there wont be enough media coverage to show these lebs crying on TV

Name: Anonymous 2006-07-26 12:02

>>36
If this had happened in the WW2 era, the IDF would be in Auschwitz.

Name: Anonymous 2006-07-26 13:02

>>36
Fail^10 for fueling the OMG ISRAEL IS LIKE NAZIS meme.

Name: Anonymous 2006-07-26 13:56

your percise bombs are anything but percise.

you'll see real smart bombs maybe in a hundred years.

Name: Anonymous 2006-07-26 15:02

Fun fact: suicide bombers are actually the smartest weapons.

Name: Anonymous 2006-07-26 16:24

>>40
Fun fact: Suicide bombers are actually the dumbest weapon users.*

fix'd

Name: Anonymous 2006-07-26 19:25

>>41
No, that would be niggers. Go to /k/ and request the nigger war pictures.

Name: Anonymous 2006-07-26 21:45

>>42
I don't get it, if they want to blow something up they throw a satchel charge with a lit fuse attached, they at least have the idea that even though you risk yourself in war you are more useful if you can fight again tommorrow. Suicide bombing is much stupider because there is no chance of your being able to throw another bomb or shoot a gun again. If your entire life is just 1 explosion when you can easily do more you must be stupid, or just lazy.

Name: Anonymous 2006-07-26 21:58

>>43
I think the act is more symbolic.  It's saying that what they are doing literally means their life to them - and it draws attention from others. 

Name: anti-chan 2006-07-26 22:17

>>44

Exactly. It's a physical and psychological attack. The only thing you can do is call the opposition "crazy". But that's just hiding your failure, isn't it? All soldiers die for their causes, regardless if it by the enemies hand or their own. If suicide bombers are "crazy" in that sense, then so are all soldiers.

Name: Anonymous 2006-07-26 22:29

>>44
It's the lazy way out, proving they are not as zealous as they make out.

>>45
How is it a failure? Can you think of a way to stop ALL suicide bombers? You also missed the point, the point was that they could do more than facilitate 1 explosion. You are not very intelligent. Are you black?

Name: Anonymous 2006-07-26 22:43

>>46

Actively showing a willingness to die for your cause or country isn't lazy. Are you saying the soldiers in Iraq are lazy? Are you saying the WW2 vets were lazy?

It is a failure to not only recognise that the "terrorists" are actually soldiers, but that you do not have what it takes as a society to deal more of an effective psychological blow  to your enemy. Arabs and Japanese aren't stupid, they understand that there could be more done to facilitate 1 explosion, isn't this why Iran is going after nuclear weaponry?

Finally, it really takes away from your argument when you resort to racial sterotypes. Especially in this case where you are 100% wrong. The reason you feel the way you do about suicide bombers is because you've allowed yourself to be subject to the propaganda of fools, instead of the reality of human conflict.

Name: Anonymous 2006-07-26 22:48

>>47
I'm not going to fill in the blanks for some dumbass troll.

Name: Anonymous 2006-07-26 22:53

>>47
Oh ok fine...

They believe they go to paradise by fighting the infidel. Therefore blowing yourself up with the bomb is lazy since they could detonate the bomb remotely and continue to fight, it's the easy way out.

The Japanese didn't have a method of guidingvery large bombs to their targets, bombers would get shot down and or would be completely innaccurate. A large amount of explosives on a fighter plane was the best method of doing this, it was logical. A fuse isn't rocket science, anyone who owns a mining company can get a hold of loads of fuses.

Iran isn't a terrorist state and have little interest in suicide bombing.

Considerring your inability to think things through before slapping your hige lips together I am right about you being stupid at least.

Name: Anonymous 2006-07-26 23:46

>>49

Why do you keep responding with propaganda? Objectively speaking it really doesn't matter if the person is blowing themselves up for virgins, SUVs, a college education, 1000+ golds, or to become an hero. Soldiers die for causes and countries.

However, the end result of a suicide bomber and reasons for using suicide bombers are psychological. The effects of a suicide bomber are psychological. The suicide bomber and kamakazi pilots are psychological weaponry. Denial of this is pure failure.

Name: Anonymous 2006-07-27 1:24

>>50
Propoganda? If it's ad nauseum propoganda it should be easy to retort to instead of repeating the argument I've just crushed. I'm not denying any facts whatsoever either, you are putting words in my mouth because you want to avoid debating the point at hand.

One last time, focus your mind entirely on this point, nothing else.

If they are fanatics who believe if they die fighting they go to paradise, they have 2 choices.
1: Die as quickly and as painlessly as possible.
2: Find the best way to do as much for the cause as possible with no consideration for physical hardship.

Option 1 results in them suicide bombing.
Option 2 results in a life of soldiery, planting bombs with fuses instead of going up with them to paradise, taking gun shot wounds and trying to stay alive despite the pain even though death would mean an easy route to paradise, seeing people die but not joining them in paradise, sweating and labouring all day hiding in small holes from the US when if you were a suicide bomber you would be with allah right now etc etc...

Therefore suicide bombing is the easy way out and anyone with more intelligence than you will view islamic extremists as lazy idiots who shirk away from option 2 thus negating the psychological effect.

Since arabs are caucasian they are about the same intelligence as me. Negroes perhaps are awed by the intellectual achievements of suicide bombers, but anyone with an IQ over 85 will not view them so.

Name: Anonymous 2006-07-27 8:40

>>51

No. Just accept that I don't agree with your premise in the first place and stop perpetuating this endless shitstorm of lose in my direction.

Your argument is completely subjective and doesn't address the reality of warfare- in this case psychological warfare. As adamant as you are about this, it's quite clear that the implications of someone being willing to directly and actively use their life as a weapon for their cause- not only makes you nervous, but it's filled you with such amount of fear that you have no choice but to bring their race, their religion and their culture into this as if it makes a difference.

They are soliders and they die. Just because "HUR HUR, I DINK DATZ st00p1dz LOLZ" doesn't mean it didn't have a psychological on the people attacked. You are living proof that it did.

Name: Anonymous 2006-07-27 8:52

>>not only makes you nervous, but it's filled you with such amount of fear that you have no choice but to bring their race, their religion and their culture into this as if it makes a difference.

But it does make a difference. The ONLY suicide bombers in the world share(d) the following characteristics:

RACE: ARAB,
RELIGION: ISLAM,
CULTURE: MIDDLE-EASTERN

Most of them were also named Mohammed, but that's merely because muslims are terribly unimaginative.

Name: Xel 2006-07-27 9:14

>>53 We are all perfectly capable of becoming suicide bombers, but I think you realize that. The problem is that neither left nor the right can drop their respective stances on the issue. Terrorism is a destructive, desperate response to direct and/or indirect influence on the lifestyles of muslims. Their antagonistic reaction is human and understandable, but by having their minds permeated with notions of submission to a divine being (in itself an insult to humanity) they are ready to 'justify' their attacks with a supernatural dimension. Terrorism has root causes -actions of benevolence and of imperialistic aggression towards muslim countries- but their reactions are self-righteous and usually involve turning towards western culture rather than the western ideologies that harm them for profit. I could also exemplify how their stagnant position on social issues and secularism has harmed their own interests and wasted countless lives.

Name: Anonymous 2006-07-27 9:45

>>54
It's not our fault. Quit buying into the Noble Savage idea. Armed and violent conflict between various groups is the natural state of existence as proved by history and few socities have been able to grow beyond it. In terms of relative peacefulness the western civilisation is a huge anomaly, which might not last.

Name: Anonymous 2006-07-27 11:04

>>53

Kamakazi.

Name: Anonymous 2006-07-27 13:36

"Your argument is completely subjective and doesn't address the reality of warfare- in this case psychological warfare. As adamant as you are about this, it's quite clear that the implications of someone being willing to directly and actively use their life as a weapon for their cause- not only makes you nervous, but it's filled you with such amount of fear that you have no choice but to bring their race, their religion and their culture into this as if it makes a difference."

Lol??? You call me subjective then say possible the most subjective thing you can think of in order to attack my person?

Suicide bombers if anything decrease the morale of the insurgents who are he real threat by making them question the legitimacy of their cause and make the stupid insurgents more eager to get themsleves killed instead of using their lives to inflict the maximum damage possible. I'm still waiting for you to disprove me. If I were back in Iraq I wouldn't be glad that the suicide bombers were stupid enough to kill themselves with their first shot and I would be more afraid of the professionals who plant more bombs, booby traps and fire more mortars.

Name: Anonymous 2006-07-27 13:41

>>54
Their government have been fucking them over and blaiming it on the west. Any actual crimes committed by westerners on the middle east are few and far between (we sacrificed lives and billions of $s getting rid of the soviets, taliban and saddam hussein). In 10 years time Iraq will be like Japan or South Korea 10 years after their liberation from tyranny. Just like Fascism and Maoism, people will see that liberty is legitimately not another form of tyranny. It is nothing like any of these ideals, it is an idea philosophically sewn int othe fabric of reality, not just a system of government plucked out of nowhere.

Name: Xel 2006-07-27 14:24

"It's not our fault. Quit buying into the Noble Savage idea." I'm sorry if I expressed myself so poorly that I gave the impression that I did. Yet I feel you responded towards what you felt I wrote. Ah, whatever, I think we could find common ground here, since I am pro-Israel on a fundamental basis.
>>58 I think I must have given of a message I actually did not want. And speaking of crimes a bunch of unneccesary and selfish acts have been made (liquidizing Iraq's quite admirable social system and taking it to odd bank accounts, as was did with the central bank of Haiti). As I've said, any muslim countries with oil or other resources have the historical lessons to doubt the west's hard power, and considering that the current administration was present when Americas soft power topppled Soviet, I think that their current acts are inexplicable. I think Iran making nukes wouldn't even have been an issue if it wasn't for the secret revert of the leftist revolution in Iran, for example.

Name: Anonymous 2006-07-27 14:47

>>59
It would be less of an issue if their leadership (and not just the prez.) didn't keep repeating that Israel "will soon disappear in a big cloud" (clearly they mean nukes here) and similar.

EVEN IF they're just trolling, and it's far from certain, those people should not have nukes.

Name: Xel 2006-07-27 14:54

>>60 Haven't said that, I am just argumenting that US policy isn't always carried out with a safe future in mind.

Name: Golem !9cFaAddX2g 2006-07-28 17:24

This war is one of the dumbest. Lebanon was 50% christian, 50% allah's lovers. They will be 100% allah&Hezbollah's lovers soon.

USA create terrorists in Irak and Israel will create more terrorist is Lebanon.

Israel and USA don't understand whatt's happen. Hezbolah is not Lebanon. Terrorists is not a country like Cuba or CCCP. Terrorists born is poorety and hate. And all USA and Isrel do is CREATE this misery and hate...

Isrel will lose. Because Israel is full of dumb who don't understand this world. They want a "Big Israel", from Nil to Euphrate. They will be nuke;

Name: Anonymous 2006-07-28 21:28

>>62

Big Isrel nuk are vrry bad amirite?

Name: Anonymous 2006-07-28 22:19

>>62
no spika engrish?

Name: Anonymous 2006-07-29 0:24

>>57

Don't know how you misconstrued that statement into "an attack on your person", but whatever. What I'm find hilarious and that you're continuing on with this "prove me wrong" nonsense as if there's anything to "prove". All you have is a point of view, you don't have 100 U.S marines or something agreeing with you.

I don't think the Suicide Bombers or Kamakazi pilots are stupid at all, I do however think that your inability to speak rationally about this speaks volumes of their psychological effect on their enemy.

Name: Anonymous 2006-07-29 1:22

>>65
Of course suicide bombers make people nervous, but their stupidity and mindless fanaticism makes them astronomically less terrifying than professional guerillas who may well plant 100s of effective bombs and booby traps in their life times instead of blowing themselves up with the first bomb they use in anger. I can't believe how fucking stupid you are, just shut the fuck up. Seriously, I'm doing you a favour by telling you to.

Name: Anonymous 2006-07-29 7:04

>>66

Fail.

Anger comes no where into the picture, these are calculated psychological assualts. (Do you even know anything about the lives of these bombers?) You think they don't know what one man is really worth? Do you think it even matters when the actions of Israel and US create more terrorists, daily?

Again I repeat: Just because you think "LOLLERS DATS STUPID" doesn't mean the suicide bomber or the kamakazi wasn't or isn't an effective psychological weapon. We're not debating as to how many mans can cause X amount of damage with explosions. We're talking about psychological warfare.

In the future please fail less hard at objectivity.

THX


Name: Anonymous 2006-07-29 8:31

but their stupidity and mindless fanaticism makes them astronomically less terrifying than professional guerillas

Actually, I find them a lot scarier. That degree of fanaticism is something I cannot relate to; it is an alien mindset. Not only do certain targets become available to them when they do not need to consider avoiding capture, but the question is if you can predict or reason with them at all. You don't quite know the rules they're playing by. Normal people don't fly aircraft into buildings.

Ever meet a lunatic? A real honest-to-god crazy fucker at the market who probably is suffering from violent paranoid schizophrenia? The ones who just stare at you quietly, or scream at some invisible man? They're scary because you can't predict them. The weirdo might try to bite your throat out because he doesn't like your shoes, for all you know.

You may have heard the following military joke: Professionals are predictable. It's the amateurs that are dangerous.

Name: Anonymous 2006-07-30 16:17


You may have heard the following military joke: Professionals are predictable. It's the amateurs that are dangerous.

this isnt true once i lost basketball game that the dumbshit coach told me same thing how amatuer might pwn and he did i guess you right then lol kkthx bye

lebanon i love it lets rebuild it kkthxbye

Name: Anonymous 2006-08-01 0:00

Ehud Olmert=Fudd Elmert=Elmer Fudd

Name: Anonymous 2006-08-01 0:06

>>68
Clever people with no moral objections are dangerous foes no matter are they professional or not. There are things you can't learn from training or experience. Muslims generally haven't been very clever though. Also letting fanaticism and anger to take control clouds your mind.

Name: Anonymous 2006-08-01 0:30

>>68
"You may have heard the following military joke: Professionals are predictable. It's the amateurs that are dangerous."

The thought that this was extrapolated from the fact that amateurs are more likely to make mistakes never crossed your mind? Like I said, maybe suicide bombers are awe inspiring to someone of your low intelligence, but anyone who has the sense to read and see more than some al qaeda recruitment ad on youtube knows that professional snipers and mortar/rpg teams are more dangerous than suicide bombers.

Name: Anonymous 2006-08-01 15:36

[quote] 40 [/quote]

true say

Name: Anonymous 2006-08-01 15:36

>>68

is gay

Name: Anonymous 2006-08-01 16:52

>>68
Haha, I'd believe this was a troll if it didn't write more than 3 sentences. I can't believe some people are this stupid!

Name: Anonymous 2006-08-04 15:40

I think the best way to keep the peace in the mid east is an empire of Isreal. When the arabs are subjugated and surrounded by people who are obviously not evil and might even want to help, they might back off. As an example I cite Japan, though let it be noted that Japan has a much different mentality.

Name: Anonymous 2006-08-04 16:25

>>76


Ah, but Israel is evil and they only want to help themselves. Read your fucking history, pick up the old testament. An "Empire of Israel" is precisely what has got these fuckers so riled up in the first place. How could you be so stupid?

Name: Anonymous 2006-08-04 16:29

Yeah, there were no wars or violence in the middle east before 1948. Then the jews came and destroyed their liberal and advanced civilisation. We need to kill all the jews and then we'll have peace and prosperity in the world.

At least, that's what the liberal media and academia wants us to think.

Name: Anonymous 2006-08-04 17:54

WHO EVER WINS, WE LOSE

Name: Anonymous 2006-08-04 18:46

>>78 didn't read his history. :(

Name: Xel 2006-08-04 18:49

>>78 What we need are more generalizations like this. Many more.

Name: Anonymous 2013-07-29 12:16

!SWEJ, WE

Name: Anonymous 2013-07-29 12:18

!SWEJ, WE

Name: Anonymous 2013-07-31 14:07

NEVER JEW A JEW

Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List