Africa

What do you know about Africa?

It's full of AIDS.

>>2

And the governments aren't able to do shit about it :(

Aren't? Or won't?

What do you know about the current cultural, political, social, religious, and economical qualities of various countries?  ie..

    * Burundi
    * Kenya
    * Rwanda
    * Tanzania
    * Uganda
    * Djibouti
    * Eritrea
    * Ethiopia
    * Somalia
    * Burundi
    * Central African Republic
    * Chad
    * Democratic Republic of the Congo
    * Equatorial Guinea
    * Gabon
    * Republic of Congo
    * Algeria
    * Egypt
    * Libya
    * Mauritania
    * Morocco
    * Sudan
    * Tunisia
    * Angola
    * Botswana
    * Lesotho
    * Malawi
    * Mozambique
    * Namibia
    * South Africa
    * Swaziland
    * Zambia
    * Zimbabwe
    * Benin
    * Burkina Faso
    * Cameroon (
    * Chad
    * Côte d'Ivoire
    * Equatorial Guinea
    * The Gambia
    * Ghana
    * Guinea
    * Guinea-Bissau
    * Liberia
    * Mali
    * Niger
    * Nigeria
    * Senegal
    * Sierra Leone
    * Togo
    * Cape Verde
    * Comoros
    * Madagascar
    * Mauritius
    * São Tomé and Príncipe
    * Seychelles

They are all put down by the white man, like Singapore, South Korea and Japan were. We need to get rid of western culture and focus on native cultures because clearly they work. I suggest we get rid of liberty and have a maoist socialist policy by first starving off the "unwanted" and also slice off the clitoris of children against their will, because it's the right thing to do.

So do the opposite of everything you said and it should work out just peachy?

I know that between Cairo and Johannesburg lies nothing but desert, starving children, and Lagos.

Don't forget bushmen.

That, and big cats eating monkeys.

>>8
Just shows how ignorant you are. you merkkkan?

>>10
Well then what IS between there?  Sunshine and bacon grease?

>>11
There are a range of ecosystems from snow-capped mountain areas to humid rainforest/jungle areas. "Nothing but desert?" If you're not being stupid, that is ignorance. Oh and yeah, there's sunshine there. I wouldn't be surprised if there was bacon grease too.

Point being: If you don't have the most fundamental knowledge of something- you should shut the fuck up about it. Most irrational fears, stupidities and other retarded behaviors are rooted in plain old ignorance.

If you read the statement above and instantly started jumping to conclusions about "maoist socialist" parties and all this other nonsense then YOU ARE APART OF THE PROBLEM.

Africa is wonderous and great- except for those filthy retard negroes.

>>14
LOL PWNED

Why didn't the inhabitants of Africa develop intensive agriculture like the rest of the world?

Frozen steppe peoples
Terrain = worst on the planet next to deep ocean and Antarctica.
Achievements = Surviving on that terrain is a feat in itself, let alone prosperring. Conquerring China and the Khwarazmian empire, developping land trade routes before industrialisation, literring the landscape with various temples, monasteries and monuments. Developping their own system of writing and extensive bureaucratic government capable of orderring huge areas of land and numbers of people.
System of agriculture = Subsistence, nomadic and with livestock as staple food source.

Sub-saharran Africans.
Terrain = 100s of square miles of hot wet fertile jungle that can easily be slash burned to provide farmland. Thousands of miles of plains lines with rich river valleys and annual flood plains. Some of the richest and easily accesible mineral deposits on the planet, lines of ancient volcanoes in north east central and south Africa.
Achievements = Mainly in colonial areas or borderring the saharra (not due to indigenous activity). The city of Zimbabwe is not an achievement, it is minimal in comparison to even minor backwater cities in empires which existed 1000s of years before the Zulus.
System of agriculture = Subsistence, nomadic and with livestock as staple food source.

>>16

Go back to the race thread. Your entire post is a shitty effort to split hairs. "Zimbabwe is not an achievement"? Well, there are educated people who say that Africa did have agriculture outside of Zimbabwe.

It's funny how already we're going back to: >>13

Point being: If you don't have the most fundamental knowledge of something- you should shut the fuck up about it. Most irrational fears, stupidities and other retarded behaviors are rooted in plain old ignorance.

Zimbabwe's agriculture was overseen by whites. The cities were made by whites too. Once the whites were booted out, there was mass starvation and suddenly large numbers of shanty towns.

However, this does belong in the race thread.

>>18


You obviously don't know what you're talking about.

>>19
Care to elaborate?

>>20

PROTIP: It's in the race thread.

>>21
Ah, I thought the above posts were referring to current Zimbabwe (the state), which is a mess.

ＥＶＥＲＹＢＯＤＹ　ＳＡＹ！！
　　　 　　∩＿＿＿∩
　 　(ヽ　 | ノ　　　　　 ヽ　　/)
　　(((i ) /　（゜）　　（゜） | ( i)))　　 ＜ ｗ・ｋ・ｔ・ｋ
　／∠彡　　　 ( _●_)　 |＿ゝ ＼
( ＿＿＿､　　　 |∪|　　　　,＿＿ ）
　　　　|　　　　 ヽノ　　 /´
　　　　|　　　　　　　　/

ＥＶＥＲＹＢＯＤＹ　ＳＡＹ！！
　　　 　　∩＿＿＿∩
　 　(ヽ　 | ノ　　　　　 ヽ　　/)
　　(((i ) /　（゜）　　（゜） | ( i)))　　 ＜ ｗ・ｋ・ｔ・ｋ
　／∠彡　　　 ( _●_)　 |＿ゝ ＼
( ＿＿＿､　　　 |∪|　　　　,＿＿ ）
　　　　|　　　　 ヽノ　　 /´
　　　　|　　　　　　　　/

It's where bix nood's come from. 

What were the effects of colonialism on Africa and where has it improved or not improved different countries?

>>10
Hey now, it's not my fault.  That's what I grew up on, but now I'm trying to unlearn all that and trying to see what else is there besides what I've seen on those infomercials.

By the way, this wasn't a race thread until 14 and 25 stepped in.

WHITE JESUS INVENTED AFRICA IN 0 A.D.
THE JEWS GAVE BLACK PEOPLE TIMEMACHINES (stolen from nazi germany, which they actually controled all along) SO THEY COULD GO BACK AND RUIN AFRICA, WHICH BELONGS TO WHITE PEOPLE.

>>28
May the mother earth be merciful!

I love how europe has been out of africa for almost a century now, but the darkies still insist it isn't their fault that they're countries are run by barbarian savages like somolia (do they even HAVE a government any more?).

Africa=NEGROWNED!

>>30

A century? You're joking right? Why is it that every history book says Modern Colonization and rule by white ended in the 80's, the mid-90's at the latest?

>>30
Truth told, sort of. Colonialism effectively ended 50 years ago. This means they ruled themselves, it means they can refuse to sell their natural resources to the west if they don't want to, it means they can kill all the white people in their country and isolate themselves off from the rest of the world if they feel the need to. Evil whitey is a term that evolved from slavery when they only white people blacks came into contact with were holding a whip, sure these were bad people, but having a vicious hate against all whites (who's non-english speaking ancestors usually came to this country with nothing but a suitcase full of clothes and experienced as much if not more discrimination than the landed black population) regardless of who they are. This hatred boils over into a perverse demand that millions of negros be masss migrated into europe and other blatantly active attempts to destroy the white race through race mixing and destroy white achievements with useless ideals like socialism. They then turn around and claim anyone who disagrees with them is racist, screaming it out loud at the slightest dissention, as if this is 1930 and Stalin has issued his purges. They are simply totalitarianists and this bullshit is simply an attempt to skapegoat whites as every tyrant does to control one group and extort another.

>>30
The seeds of evil sown by the white man bares deep roots and is diffcult to remove. Africa was raped and pillaged, can it be undeflowered? These totalitarianists wouldn't even exist had it not been for exemplary models.

>>32

No. Apatheid ended in the 80's. You are WRONG. You can't "refuse" anything from the west, you know that. Very difficult to do for any country. Also, people are up in arms over the genocide of dutch and french farmers and such, are you condoning that?

The rest of your post reads like a KKK poster.

You are delusional if you believe all that shit.

>>34
Fact: nigger countries are inferior because - you guessed it - they're run by niggers.

Hypothetical:  No black people existed in Africa.  White Europeans colonize all of Africa.  Slavery does not exist except for indentured servitude among whites, and is abolished in 100 years.  With white people living and running all of Africa, how have Europeans fared to the present day using the available resources of the continent with and without trade with outsiders?

>>34
Apatheid ended in the 80's.

* Only in South Africa. What about everywhere else?
* South Africa is one of the few semi-successful states in Africa.

Pray tell, why are Hong Kong and Singapore doing so well? They were occupied by colonial powers too, yet they're economic powerhouses now. Even the piss poorest Asian country is stinking rich compared to most African ones.

Why is that?

>>36
Africa doesn't have any resources. Europeans just colonized it to have penis fights between their kings and emperors.

Africa doesn't have any resources.

wut

>>37
Mongoloids evolved in a similiar manner to caucasians except in a different environment. Caucasians evolved in dry desert conditions, the ice age was an environmental catastrophe compared to today's environment, the Saharra was much larger and the mediteranean much drier and colder. As a note whites are a mix breed between those that evolved near the ice caps which stretched across europe (cro-magnon) and neolithic arab-caucasians that migrated there after agriculture caused a population boom in the fertile crescent. Cro-magnon were more intelligent with a 5% larger skull cavity, but their traits have been so mixed no one can claim ancestry from them, blonde blue eyed scandinavians have the same size skull cavity as black haired brown eyed Italians. This isn't an attempt to claim all whites are arabs and we should obey our new superior arab masters, it is fact. An unfortunate fact since cro-magnon was superior, but under more populous competition and forced to live in freezing swampland and dense forest.

The ancestors of the mongoloids travelled so quickly east south of the himalayas and into China, south east Asia and the Phillipines that they were dispersed from those that stayed in India. They lived mainly in the oceanian and south east asian jungles and maintained most of their negroid traits, many tribes still exist there today whom have not lost their negroid traits due to the evolutionary imperative of jungle conditions. Populations exploded and tribes were pushed north since it was easier to just go to new territories instead of competing with other tribes. Those that had the intelligence could travel to more territories and survive in harsher conditions or just get more food out of their hunting grounds. Mongoloids are not naturally petite, however they produce less testosterone since they were not forced into competition with each other and they did not need to hunt. Mongoloids are a race of trappers only hunting easy game like mammoths. When the mammoths went exstinct caucasians hunted deer, but in the east Mongoloids saw this as too difficult (until domestication) and didn't bother with hunting difficult game as they were not facing tough competition.

>>37
 
This is ignorance. You don't seem to understand the fundamentals of modern-African colonization. "Just South Africa"? Are you serious? Do you actually believe this?

>>41
Okay. South Africa, Zimbabwe, and...?

And pray do tell why Asia seems to be doing fine, but not Africa.

>>42

...

Colonization/Aparthied applies to everyone who had dark skin in the nineteen hundreds. There were many semitic peoples who weren't "negroid", but were caught up in colonization as well. This too, is in the race thread.

And you keep asking about Asia and all these other countries "doing fine". You're delusional. Asia isn't doing fine. Scotland isn't doing fine. There are alot of places and alot of people who aren't "doing fine".

Your argument is subjective, yet you keep arguing it as absolutely true fact. Why?

>>43
Are you hard of reading? Let me give you that quote again:

Apatheid ended in the 80's.

Here, let me make it more obvious for you:

Apatheid ended in the >>>>80's<<<<.

And incidentally it's one of the few African states that isn't a complete failure. So, if the rest of Africa was left to its own devices decades ago, why is it still a dump?

Asia isn't doing fine.

Right, right... so... care to explain Hong Kong? Taiwan? South Korea? Singapore? Japan? Shit, even much of China, Malaysia, and Thailand?

Many of these places are first-world, and all of them are a lot richer than anywhere in the sub-Sahara. Why isn't there a single success story out of Africa?

Asia crawled out of its hole and is marching to world domination. Shit, for a while people thought Japan would eventually own the entire US. So where the fuck is Africa?

>>44 that isn't a complete failure

Give them another five years.  They're well on their way.

>>44

Well for one thing the disribution of wealth is horrible. Alot of white people own alot of black land (some illegally). But guess with all the killings that are going on, that'll correct itself right? Or will you just resolve to viewing them as savage niggers again?

When you talk about Africa, you, yourself don't single out certain countries as "working". So why should I accept it when you go back and say: "Oh, I meant everywhere but the places white people colonized"

But there is no such place.

See: this is what I don't get.

Instead of looking at Africa and saying: "See? White Colonization worked for South Africa" you should be saying: "Look at what colonization did to 90% of Africa." - Do you think colonization happened in only one country there?

>>45

You can't compare the places you listed to Africa because Africa suffered a greater degree of modern colonization. Keyword here is: Modern. We didn't go through a phase of using the entire asian "race", REGARDLESS OF NATIONALITY, as slaves. But we did so to black people.

Why?

Alot of white people own alot of black land (some illegally).

Right, right. I'll go over to Zambia and check out the LARGE CHUNKS OF LAND OWNED BY EVIL WHITE MEN. Congo is run by the Illuminati. Somalia is clearly in the hands of international cartels. Zimbabwe is still secretly controlled by them evil whiteys. And let's not talk about Botswana!

But this dodges the issue: you want to talk collective? Why isn't there one success story out of all the countries there? Asia has a bunch to show. Africa? Sometimes it really does seem like all they do over there is genocide, suck dictatorial dick, and get full of AIDS.

You can't compare the places you listed to Africa because Africa suffered a greater degree of modern colonization.

lol wut?

Africa was the site of a thriving culture with nation states and great empires with a flurry of history and great wars just like Asia, India, Central and South America the Middle East and Europe.

...

BWAHAHAHAHAAAA

The only great civilizations in Africa were during the colonial era. When the whites left, Africa regressed back to the shithole it was before the colonists arrived.

>>39
whites are a mix breed between cro-magnon and ARAB-caucasian~~~~

the truth is clear now. ALLAHUACBARR

But why niggers gang rape babies especially when not under White rule or supervision? Is it just the way they shake their little hips? Or is it that mickey mouse underwear?

Africa's great! Except for all the niggers

>>53
Finally a statement that makes complete sense!

>>53
this is exactly why i go on 4chan to change the world and discuss current affairs.