Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon.

Pages: 1-4041-

Why are Republicans fat?

Name: Anonymous 2006-01-01 13:39

This has bothered me to the point that I can no longer watch CSPAN or CNN.  These people are morbidly obese.  They have five chins.  They look like squirrels saving up for a nuclear winter.  Why can't they spend a couple hours on a treadmill before coming on TV?  Either they look grotesquely fat with some white hair, some gray hair, or with no hair.  It's disturbing, and it's not something a public representative should be representing in this country.   

Name: Anonymous 2006-01-01 13:43

What're you doin' watchin' CSPAN/CNN anyways?

Name: Anonymous 2006-01-01 13:46

Fat people are popular in america because the american public can identify with them. "He's fat like me so maybe we other qualities (sic) too"

Name: Anonymous 2006-01-01 14:58

Too much foie gras and Château Lafite. TIME PARADOX, these are also the same guys who came up with "Freedom Fries."

Name: Anonymous 2006-01-02 2:43

Republicans are fat because they drink a ton of cum.

FUN FACT: A teaspoon of Cum has over 50 grams of fat.

WOOT!!!!!

Name: Anonymous 2006-01-02 12:28

>>5
Wrong, it contains protein, which is converted into fat if it isn't used.

Name: Anonymous 2006-01-02 19:26

>>6
Well since they spend all fucking day watching sports and gabbing about 'reality tv' instead of working, I guess it isn't being used up.

Name: Anonymous 2006-01-03 6:48 (sage)

If someone is going to point out errors with >>5, how about the rather obvious problem of 50 grams of anything in a teaspoon? That must be some dense cum there.

It's a joke. Geez.

Name: Anonymous 2006-01-03 8:39

>>7
Actually, nearly all lazy welfare rats are democrats. The democratic party is home to niggers, spics, faggots, pedos, and other such freaks. Republicans are not lazy but they are heartless bastards from hell.

Name: Anonymous 2006-01-05 8:06

>>9
And the Republican party is home to you. The world is now fucked.

Name: Anonymous 2006-01-05 15:23

>>10
Wrong. I vote independent.

Name: Anonymous 2006-01-06 6:54

>>11

Who cares how you vote? You have the ideology of a racist hick evanglist republican. You lose.

Name: Anonymous 2006-01-06 23:08

>>1
The lack of fiber in their diet (fiber is classified as liberal) causes the build up of feces, thus creating the unhealthy condition of morbid obesity.

Name: Anonymous 2006-01-07 23:15

Michael Moore.

Name: Anonymous 2006-01-07 23:20

>>14
Proof that contact with Fat Republicans is unhealthy.

Name: Anonymous 2006-01-08 9:42

>>12
Blow it out your rectum.

Name: Anonymous 2006-01-08 16:05

>>16
With black powder or cordite?

Name: Anonymous 2006-01-08 22:14

yeah, for real, there are some fat democrats, and there are some non-fat republicans, but if you was on the congressional yacht and it hit an iceberg and was all sinking and you had to choose which party's inflatable life boat to get in, well, you know which side of the boat to go to

Name: Anonymous 2006-01-13 15:27

wrong question.

correct question: why are fat people republicans?

Name: Anonymous 2006-01-13 15:28

>>19

RICH RICH RICH RICH RICH

Name: Anonymous 2006-01-13 20:09

>>20
Why are all fat ass welfare queens democrat!

Name: Anonymous 2006-01-13 20:31

Because the republican welfare queens all starved to death.

Name: Anonymous 2006-01-13 21:18 (sage)

>>22
*Because the republican welfare queens stayed married and got jobs once their kids went to school.*

fix'd

Name: Anonymous 2006-01-13 21:42 (sage)

>>23
That was a joke you idiot.

Name: Anonymous 2006-01-17 0:54

>>13
You're damn right, they're FULL OF SHIT.

Name: Ω 2006-01-27 11:47

>>1

it's not just republicans it's polititians in general


polititians sicken me, they spend their entire lives arguing and making everyone's lives difficult


does anyone agree?

Name: Anonymous 2006-01-27 13:17

Does anyone notice that all politicians are really rich?

Name: Anonymous 2006-01-27 16:14

>>27
THEY'RE STEALING FROM US!!!

Name: Anonymous 2006-01-27 20:05

>>27
Only poor people should be allowed to hold office.

Name: Anonymous 2006-01-27 23:31

people should only be allowed to hold office once. they should be payed the same wages as they got in the real world, or a standard low amount over thir housepayment of course because they need to keep thir house.

Name: Ω !9kS7kgmVOs 2006-01-28 1:03

>>30
but what if they need 7 lamborginbeanies to pick up their mail in a different car every day?

Name: Anonymous 2006-01-28 8:56

Paying civil servants low wages would only encourage corruption. Giving them a lot of power with low wages and they would ask for bribes or any trickery to get more money. Civil servants need to eat too.

Name: Anonymous 2006-01-28 23:07

civil servants should be sealed inside their offices and watched carefully during their time in office

they should live a military type lifestyle, except aimed at reducing expenses as much as possible

Name: Anonymous 2006-01-28 23:09

>>32

"encourage corruption" *looks at abramoff scandal*
lol, ur kidding right?

Name: Anonymous 2006-01-29 4:27

Civil servants should not govern, they should administer the things that they have been elected to take charge of. People are not things, and if civil servants do not carry out the collective will of those who elect them, they should be summarily fired. If they have abused their position, they should be subject to harsh punishment.

Name: Anonymous 2006-01-29 7:04

The government should be one giant coorporation where people can invest in companies they like as if every £ is a vote.

The only nationalised thing should be the military and police which is heavily infiltrated by the general populace.

Name: Anonymous 2006-01-29 7:28 (sage)

The government is one giant corporation where

fixed

Name: Anonymous 2006-01-30 16:18

>>37
But that's the problem, it isn't. It can never go bankrupt, because it controls the nation's money (through the reserve) and can just run off more bills and inflate prices when the ship is listing. In the real world fuzzy accounting works for only at most a decade before imploding and imploding FAST (enron), government can sustain itself so long as a majority is stupid enough to buy into it.

Name: Anonymous 2006-01-30 16:44

>>38

um...so basically you start your post off saying "it isn't"...and then by the end of the paragraph you say that's exact what it is...? because that's what just happened. i know, i know...you completely missed it....but it called a revelation...hold onto it dearly.

Name: Anonymous 2006-01-30 17:36

>>38, are you >>36?

Because if you are, what makes you think things will be any different if the government is a corporation (when it already effectively is)?

Name: Anonymous 2006-01-30 23:09

>>40
You can only vote in the government, you can't vote in civil servants or pressure civil servants into being more efficient. No capitalist believes that everything should be 100% capitalist. If you give every man and woman a vote, they will vote for minimum wage and issues will be resolved in an unbiased unemotional utilitarian manner and all the soldiers and police will know what to do if someone wants to get rid of voting or freedom of speech and tyranny will be a thing of the past. Capitalists want this as the alternative is tyranny in which case currency becomes void and anyone with a gun can take over your profits.

What we need is to persuade people that capitalism is a good idea and should be extended to everything except the preservation of justice.

Name: Anonymous 2006-02-07 10:53

>>36
are yoo frum europe?

Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List