Why do they do that when there DVD drives are common place? 1 DVD installs faster then 4-6 CDs, they weigh less too, and take up the same amount of material! Help me understand?
Name:
Anonymous2007-06-08 22:04 ID:nrO6ElIc
Not everyone has a DVD drive.
Name:
Anonymous2007-06-09 1:03 ID:0tZJLs4B
cds are cheap
Name:
Anonymous2007-06-09 2:00 ID:OgpTzor8
the people, they is poor.
Name:
Anonymous2007-06-09 5:53 ID:9ICMgg1L
>>1
I've thought that about PS2 games that come on 2 CD's. Why the fuck not just use 1 DVD?!
Distributors aren't the brightest fucking bunch...
Name:
Anonymous2007-06-09 11:34 ID:msjZjcrz
Publishers are jews. Even the japanese ones.
Name:
Anonymous2007-06-09 19:07 ID:I3MV0Ihw
>>2 >>4
If they don't have a DVD drive, how the hell can they afford to buy a game? A DVD drive can be bought for 50-60 bucks.. same price as a game.
>>5
I can see 2 CDs, but when they hit more then that is when it's time to reconsider what they did and shoot for a DVD. The PS2 will keep getting games until the price of the PS3 comes down, and then we'll have this same discussion with DVD vs Blu-ray in 3-5 years.
Name:
Anonymous2007-06-09 20:21 ID:K2wIYgsm
>>7
I didn't have a DVDrive until I bought a new, shitty emachine. Why would I buy a DVD drive when everything comes out on CDs anyway?
Name:
Anonymous2007-06-09 20:22 ID:CYkRuZ96
Well, I'd RATHER spend $50 on a game than a DVD drive. Besides, you only need to install the discs once. It's not THAT much trouble is it?
My DVD drive is dead, so the publishers are releasing games on CDs out of consideration for me.
Name:
Anonymous2007-06-12 7:19 ID:McPmt+4G
who cares about DVD drives they will be obselete by 2012 HOLOGRAPHIC IS THE WAY OF THE FUTURE who wouldn't want a disc with 1.6 TERABYTES of space and a 960 M/BIT transfer rate with an AVERAGE LIFE EXPECTANCY OF 50 YEARS!!!!!!!
Name:
Anonymous2007-06-12 20:52 ID:DUy5sCId
>>16
But you're a cheap jew who'll still be using cd's right?