Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

Kbuntu vs Ubuntu

Name: Anonymous 2009-06-22 15:50

Can an experienced anon tell me their thoughts on Kbuntu vs Ubuntu please.

Name: Anonymous 2009-06-22 20:00

They both suck, get yourself a real UNIX®.

Name: Anonymous 2009-06-23 16:17

The problem with Kubuntu vs Ubuntu vs Xubuntu is that, as you know already, the only difference is the desktop environment each comes with (all allow installing each other's), and what exactly is a desktop environment is something you'll only understand after trying a few for a while. Pick either Gnome or KDE now without much thinking - look at a few screenshots if you will - and later on you can try the other one and really decide.

Also when you have picked your favorite don't forget to flame the shit out of the other one, it's our most precious tradition.

TL;DR it won't make a difference until you know what you're doing.

Name: Anonymous 2009-06-23 19:25

Kubuntu is basically like taking a good OS, and then fucking it up with Windows-esque shit.

Gnome for life, dawg.  KDE is wannabe Windows, but worse.

Name: Anonymous 2009-06-24 5:53

Their both shit!
get gentoo
its optimized for YOUR pc
not someone elses

Name: Anonymous 2009-06-26 21:08

i like puppies

Name: Anonymous 2009-06-27 20:41

>>5 CFLAGS kickin' in yo

Name: Anonymous 2009-06-27 22:52

they both suck cocks INSTALL GENTOO FAGGOT

Name: Free Working Porn Passwords 2009-06-28 9:01

WE HAVE THE LARGEST NUMBER OF HACKED XXX PASSWORDS, NOW OVER 350! HIGH QUALITY CONTENT!!
Download here:
http://showip.be/url/fe4

Name: Anonymous 2009-06-29 12:58

heh, well they are both the same - just diffrent desktop enviroments & a few different programs.

Name: Anonymous 2009-06-30 1:11

>>1
What >>3 said.  Especially:
>it won't make a difference until you know what you're doing.

To which I would add: "And once you know what you're doing, the difference won't matter."

People treat it like a huge, life-alter decision, but the irony is that, by the time you are moderately adept at using *nix, you will learn to HATE BOTH KDE AND GNOME.  Desktop environments exist to hold your hand.  That's fine for what it's worth, but once you learn to fend for yourself, they are big, bloated monsters that just get in your way.  Eventually you will probably find yourself looking for something lighter-weight.

So just pick one based on what catches your eye in screenshots, and use it until you tire of it, then find something else.

Name: Anonymous 2009-07-02 22:49

>>11
Just curious, what WM and utils do you use, or do you even use X?

Name: Anonymous 2009-07-05 1:59

kubuntu looks moar like windows

Name: Anonymous 2009-07-05 6:10

Speaking as a noob, KDE looks loads better than GNOME.  GNOME looks like it's stuck in the 90s.

Name: Anonymous 2009-07-05 10:54

wouldnt go for Kubuntu, has a fair few problems from when i had a muck around with it, just wasnt as stable as ubuntu for some reason.

Name: Anonymous 2009-07-05 10:55

ubuntu

Name: Anonymous 2009-07-06 4:48

>>12
I've mostly used Enlightenment in the past, and am presently learning fvwm (which is incredibly featureful, but all the options are set in config scripts - there are *no* GUI menus).  Fluxbox and Openbox are pretty popular, but I don't have much experience with them.

As for utilities, I'm a minimalist.  I still use tin for USENET, for instance.  Mail has been an ongoing issue of finding a program I'm really happy with: elm, PINE, etc., are dated, and I don't particularly like Thunderbird. I've been meaning to try out a little-known mailer called mahogany.  There are lots of options out there if you look, though - there are even some lightweight graphical file managers if you don't like Midnight Commander.  Also, remember that just because one doesn't run GNOME or KDE doesn't mean one can't install the associated libraries so that GTK- and Qt-based programs will work.  There are relatively few such programs that depend on GNOME or KDE actually running (and most of what DOES is the bloated stuff - like Evolution, for instance - that I was trying to get away from anyway).

Name: Anonymous 2009-07-06 16:32

>>17
Have you tried mutt, that along with some procmail filters works pretty well.

Name: Anonymous 2009-07-06 17:48

>>18
I haven't used mutt, though I know of it.  It doesn't seem to offer *that* much that elm ME+ and PINE don't.  Also, it's nice to have a GUI client.  Although I don't *send* HTML mail, I *get* a fair amount of it (because some people insist on sending it), and I find it a hassle with CLI clients.  Lastly, though this is a somewhat silly, personal preference and nothing more, I don't like the fact that mutt breaks the naming convention for *nix e-mail MUAs.

Name: Anonymous 2009-07-06 19:50

>>19
When you mention PINE, are you also including ALPINE as well?

Name: Anonymous 2009-07-06 21:58

There the same damn thing, fags.

1. Install Ubuntu
2. sudo apt-get install kubuntu-desktop

You know have it all

thank me later.

Name: Anonymous 2009-07-06 23:23

>>20
Yeah, though I haven't used Alpine (my last experience with PINE was in college, and that was before Alpine came along).

Name: Anonymous 2009-07-12 13:12

ubuntu..

Name: Anonymous 2009-07-12 13:14

>>21
KDE sucks

Name: Anonymous 2009-07-24 6:34

X sucks

Name: Anonymous 2009-07-24 9:46

fuck you and your xservers, command line for the win

Name: Anonymous 2009-07-25 0:05

I prefer Gubuntu.

Name: Anonymous 2009-07-27 21:01

KDE sucks, Gnome is better

Name: Anonymous 2009-07-28 4:29

Gnome sucks, KDE is better

Name: QkiZ 2010-12-15 7:45

you suck!

Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List