Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon.

Pages: 1-

Win Server 2003 email

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-18 17:36

Windows Server 2003 as an email server.

WTF is this shit. I don't want to create windows accounts for all email users.

The POP service allows one to create a password text file store in the users mail box for authenticaltion. Great.

The Virtual SMTP service does not allow the use of this file for authentication. So the only way to send mail is to leave it as an open relay, which I will not do.

Is there a setup that accomdates the requirement of no user accounts/active directory for each email user using the built in POP/SMTP services.

Or is there a good alternate solution that is not Exchange?

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-18 18:30

Linux.

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-18 20:37

Linux is not an option, and you are a fag for suggesting it.

This server needs to be a workhorse for a while so I need it to do everything. That includes being a database server. Linux does not offer anything close to SQL Server. And I don't need some shit going over the Linux DB options. I know then, and if you think any can compete with SQL Server, then you don't know shit anyways.

But the topic isn't databases, its email servers on Windows, not fucking Linux or FreeBSD or some other fucking stupid response.

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-18 21:39

>>3
Ahaha oh wow.
I hope you aren't connecting this thing to the internet. The botnets are big enough as it is.

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-18 22:00

Just looking over the latest security alerts here (last 24 hours or so excluding websites and uncommon 3rd party apps):

Linux:
-Apache HTTP Server 2.2.6, 2.0.61 and 1.3.39 'mod_status' Cross-Site Scripting Vulnerability
-Apache 'mod_proxy_ftp' Undefined Charset UTF-7 Cross-Site Scripting Vulnerability
-Apache HTTP Server 413 Error HTTP Request Method Cross-Site Scripting Weakness
-Apache mod_imagemap and mod_imap Cross-Site Scripting Vulnerability
-Linux Kernel 'pppol2tp_recvmsg()' Remote Denial of Service Vulnerability
-Samba NMBD Logon Request Remote Buffer Overflow Vulnerability
-Perl Unicode '\Q...\E' Quoting Construct Regular Expression Buffer Overflow Vulnerability
-PHP 5 'posix_access()' Function 'safe_mode' Bypass Directory Traversal Vulnerability
-PHP 'chdir()' and 'ftok()' 'safe_mode' Multiple Security Bypss Vulnerabilities
-OpenSSH ForceCommand Command Execution Weakness
-Apache Tomcat WebDav Remote Information Disclosure Vulnerability
-Apache Tomcat Cookie Quote Handling Remote Information Disclosure Vulnerability
-Apache Tomcat JULI Logging Component Default Security Policy Vulnerability
-Fetchmail Verbose Mode Large Log Messages Remote Denial of Service Vulnerability

Linux and Windows:
-Multiple Vendor HTML Form Protocol Vulnerability

Windows:
-No-IP DUC Client for Windows Local Information Disclosure Vulnerability
-Microsoft Visual Basic Enterprise Edition 6 'vb6skit.dll' Remote Buffer Overflow Vulnerability

Bonus, AOL's Netscape 3:
Mozilla Firefox 3 Unspecified Buffer Overflow Vulnerability

You are obviously a stupid piece of shit, but can you tell which list is bigger?

At this moment right now, having a properly configured Windows ISS server looks better than that unsecure LAMP shit on Linux. Of course, when all your knoweldge comes from blog posts and shit eating retards, you will find this fact hard to swallow. Yet, when you eat your own shit, its obviously easy to swallow.

Name: Gilliam !F73v.WtXdM 2008-06-18 22:05

try XAMPP. i checked it out briefly after i setup my own http+php+mysql 30MB package(really, i just mashed the 3 together in a folder labled "server", it worked ok for myself).

http://portableapps.com/apps/development/xampp

right from their page:... each can be turned on and off as wanted.
    * Apache
    * MySQL
    * PHP + PEAR
    * MiniPerl
    * OpenSSL
    * phpMyAdmin
    * XAMPP Control Panel
    * Webalizer
    * Mercury Mail Transport System
    * FileZilla FTP Server
    * SQLite
    * ADODB
    * Zend Optimizer
    * XAMPP Security

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-18 22:19

>>5
You are obviously a stupid piece of shit, but can you tell which list is bigger?
Do you not understand the concept of open source? Bugs get found more quickly, and when they're found there's a much higher chance of them getting reported.

There's a good reason the vast majority of servers out there is running Linux, and price isn't it.

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-19 0:01

>>7

Another shit eating nigger.

http://www.eweek.com/c/a/Linux-and-Open-Source/Linux-Losing-Market-Share-to-Windows-Server/

"In 2000, Windows comprised about half of the server operating system market, followed by Unix and Netware at about 17 percent each and Linux reaching towards 10 percent, she said, noting that today Windows owns about 70 percent, Linux about 20 percent, with Unix below 10 percent and Netware barely registering."

Windows has grown from 50-70% in 7 years. Linux has grown from 10-20%.

That does not constitute a vast majority and actually demonstrates that Windows is growing faster than Linux as a server.

Bugs get found more quickly? You don't report a bug to security vulnerability site. You fix it or report it to the devs. That list constitutes exploits on Linux vs. Windows.

By both measures (market share and security) Linux has lost the round to Windows, again.

Get your head out of your ass and stop reading fake shit. Facts speak for themsleves.

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-19 12:05

Try Scalix. It's meant to replace Exchange and 11.4 has just come out. They offer a free Community Edition.

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-19 13:04

>>8
Jeepers, you are rude.

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-20 2:29

So, when shit heads think some idiot as fucking stupid as them posts about Windows, they can say how Linux is better. But when it is proven that Windows is a better solution (using facts instead of shit head blog posts and faggotry) they shut the fuck up.

You Linux fags are what killing Linux. The whole community is apparently stupider than shit.

Name: replica porsche watches 2011-06-01 22:35

As long as portray is a http://www.replica-watches-site.com , It is the http://www.replicawatcheshot.com  of the Moon. a http://www.replicawatcheshot.com  of rather basic purpose, It has admirers http://www.replicawatcheshot.com . since the watchmaking production realized wIth the purpose of http://www.replicawatcheshot.com/  on hand a http://www.replicawatcheshot.com/  opening, It hasn gone down wearing concerning make happy http://www.replica-watches-site.com . revive how on the practice on the road about make http://www.replicawatcheshot.com ? lost in aimed of a way to facilitate contents http://www.replicawatcheshot.com , one watchmakers even thought to it http://www.replicawatcheshot.com/  to dent the http://www.swisswatchesnet.com  to the dimension of a terminated http://www.swisswatchesnet.com  . added to though it http://www.replica-watches-site.com  , it was not glaring.

Name: Anonymous 2011-06-16 1:23

I highly advise you take a look at iRedOS, it is a pretty good mail server. Though it is built to run on top of CentOS.

Also as a side note, I find that linux is a lot better for server, I don't like it as much for desktops.  So if we are arguing servers then my vote goes to linux.  Takes a little bit more work to get it to work just how you want it, but it pays off in stability later... my linux server has had 78 days of up time currently... well I have never seen my windows server get over 30 days of up time...

Name: 天天素 2011-06-16 3:06

五便宝 カプセル:http://www.shanghaikanpo.com/view/1378.html
レビトラ:http://www.shanghaikanpo.com/view/1125.html
levitra:http://www.shanghaikanpo.com/view/1125.html
藏秘男宝:http://www.shanghaikanpo.com/view/1268.html
性愛密碼強腎カプセル:http://www.shanghaikanpo.com/view/1056.html
西班牙蒼蝿迷情液 :http://www.shanghaikanpo.com/view/1074.html
Jelly潤滑剤:http://www.shanghaikanpo.com/view/1087.html
1粒神:http://www.shanghaikanpo.com/view/1118.html
天天素:http://www.shanghaikanpo.com/view/1407.html
天天素 清脂カプセル:http://www.shanghaikanpo.com/view/1407.html
花痴 :http://www.shanghaikanpo.com/view/1363.html
美人豹女性用口服液:http://www.shanghaikanpo.com/view/1296.html
東方神龍生精 カプセル:http://www.shanghaikanpo.com/view/1244.html

Name: new special items 2011-06-16 9:54

Name: Anonymous 2011-06-17 9:08

Bumping a 3 year old...

Name: Anonymous 2011-06-17 9:11

Bumping a 3 year old...

Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List