Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon.

Pages: 1-

Corieoulis (sp?) effect

Name: Anonymous 2007-08-24 20:03 ID:VGaXZF4a

Is it true that water when poured down the drain will swirl one direction more in the Northern Hemisphere than the Southern?  Not that it'll always swirl the same way in a particular hemisphere but does that location actually affect the chances it'll swirl in a direction?

Name: Anonymous 2007-08-24 21:13 ID:OMWCIZSF

>>1
lol, itt we believe the earth is round

Name: Anonymous 2007-08-24 21:42 ID:BoEGhjIW

at the equator it's 50/50 mid year.

Name: Anonymous 2007-08-27 22:48 ID:JrPOcU2v

Fucking tool. The coriolis effect is too small to affect water in a drain.

Name: Anonymous 2007-08-28 2:41 ID:KYDr/Ykb

Fucking tool. The drain is too small to be affected by the Coriolis effect.

Name: Anonymous 2007-08-28 15:59 ID:N2vAtCkZ

The Coriolis force is a fictitious force !

Name: Anonymous 2007-08-28 18:11 ID:uuOLyjAm

http://www.straightdope.com/classics/a1_161.html

Cecil's weighed in with a "no."

Name: Anonymous 2007-08-29 4:16 ID:eXGIxhzz

>>6
Yeah, just like centrifugal force is fake
learn2nonintertialreferenceframe, faggot

Name: Anonymous 2007-08-29 5:14 ID:Nxl4nYIC

>>8

Fails

>>6 is right

Name: Anonymous 2007-08-30 13:14 ID:KV0F4Cuo

>>9
fails
>>8
is right
coriolis/centrifugal forces are very real, if you're in a rotating reference frame (ie Earth)

Name: Anonymous 2007-08-30 17:26 ID:QXbCkRyK

>>10

Almost everthing is just a "point-of-view-situation".

We could even use the galaxy as frame of reference.

Only thing that is constant in every frame of references the speed of light!

Name: Anonymous 2007-08-30 17:41 ID:KV0F4Cuo

>>11
which is why 6 and 8 are faggots for saying it's fictitious when it does exist depending on your 'point of view'

Name: Anonymous 2007-08-30 21:35 ID:lru7RX99

>>11
Speed of light is not constant. It can be affected by gravity wells.

Stop swallowing that E=MC2 shit.

Name: Anonymous 2007-08-31 6:33 ID:qh77WvZi

>>13

Full explanation, otherwise gtfo.

Name: Anonymous 2007-08-31 7:14 ID:fSFvg6UM

>>14
How much simpler do yo want?

Name: Anonymous 2007-08-31 7:30 ID:qh77WvZi

>>15

I want to hear the FULL-explanation.

Name: Anonymous 2007-08-31 11:14 ID:HweixRmR

>>16
a hundred years ago it was scientifically impossible to travel to space with in result achieving imba speeds to the earth's frame of reference...

so that THEORY of general relativity which works fine in many (note NOT ALL cases) might have a few bugs in it so don't knock it...

its difficult to say what would actually be the most vcomprehensive representation of the world around us... human intelligence is at an infant stage now (needs more microchips/ram/matiX to be zOmg imbA  or smth)

so asmuch as it pitys me to say this we will never know for sure about this "lightspeed" well at least not in the near future and even when we learn all about the workings within our universe... what about... ah nvm humanity won't survive that long anyway

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-02 0:07 ID:sesPDFZf

>>13

We can also artificially slow and speed up light.  For example, in a certain gas, light travels faster than it does in a vacuum.  And there are mirroring techniques to slow the speed of light.

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-02 5:16 ID:N107+HW2

>>18

to speed up light over 300km/s ?

Link or proof!

I know that the speed of light in vacuum is the maximum.

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-02 19:22 ID:TwlwbdbW

>>19

you can make light travel at 300c through specially-prepared caesium gas

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-03 6:51 ID:a8RIOWRo

>>20 Link?

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-03 7:10 ID:2PR925yG

>>21
now thats fucking lazy...

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-03 18:18 ID:Vrms8XIF


Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List