Oh, wait, you can't, because that would mean you just divided by zero.
Name:
Anonymous2008-09-10 12:14
>>2
But if x=1 in g(x),then g(1)=0.
Maybe I didn't explain the question properly:
If f(x) can be reduced to g(x),then why is it that f(x) is defined at 1,and g(x) is not?
Name:
Anonymous2008-09-10 13:24
>>3
f(x) cannot just be reduced to g(x) like that. The reduction introduces a condition on g(x), namely that it is undefined for x = 1.
you can only approach 1, that is, lim->1
learn some first principles.
Name:
Anonymous2008-09-14 17:54
Top Ten Math Major Pick-Up Lines
10. You fascinate me more than the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus.
9. Since distance equals velocity times time, let's let velocity or time approach infinity, because I want to go all the way with you.
8. My love for you is like a concave up function because it is always increasing.
7. Let's convert our potential energy to kinetic energy.
6. Wanna come back to my room....and see my 733mhz Pentium?
5. You and I would add up better than a Riemann sum.
4. Your body has the nicest arc length I've ever seen.
3. I wish I was your derivative because then I would be tangent to your curves.
2. I hope you know set theory because I want to intersect you and union you.
1. Would you like to see my log?