Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon.

Pages: 1-

Political science.

Name: Anonymous 2008-03-06 10:06

I'm not into ideologies and such faggotry. I prefer rational objective proper empirical methods into deducing what decisions are/were best. Not just in ordinary applications but also socially unacceptable instances, for instance I prefer not to define enemies as the ultimate evil as some view Osama Bin Laden and Hitler, I view them for what they are and I do the same with all other controversial subjects. I get the impression many are offended by my objectivity since they fear that someone who delves so deep into their opponent's ideals may be convinced by them, I am often mistaken for a naive idiot but in truth I merely seek to understand what makes such people tick.

Discuss.

Name: Anonymous 2008-03-06 10:31

Power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely

Name: Anonymous 2008-03-06 10:45

>>1
You are in fact a naive idiot. You are also a fucking Nazi terrorist supporter.
Prove me wrong.

Name: Anonymous 2008-03-06 12:59

>>1

I stopped believing in evil for the sake of evil.  What people do for their own greed, justification, beliefs or self validation, when it conflicts with other people's goals and sense of harmony, will be viewed as evil.

Name: 4tran 2008-03-06 23:05

>>1
They thought they were right, and killed lots of people.  Now most people on earth hate them.  Now what?

Name: Anonymous 2008-03-08 8:50

Oh hi americans, evil is bad righ?

Name: Anonymous 2008-03-08 10:41

Using science to support your arguments is fine, but political science isn't going to settle ideological disputes.

Name: Anonymous 2008-03-08 12:18

>>1
You believe in what is known as moral relativism.
In other words, everyone has the right to do whatever they want, but no one has a right to be offended by it.
You are naive, sir, and also a de facto cornhole.

Name: Anonymous 2008-03-08 12:39

>>8
shit post

Name: Anonymous 2008-03-08 12:50

Political ``science'' is as scientific as celebrity gossip, and exactly as profound. The only difference is that the people political science tends to discuss rarely show their boobs.

Name: Anonymous 2008-03-08 13:06

I think >>8 is right.

Name: Anonymous 2008-03-09 11:44

>>2 Not necessarily.
>>3 There is nothing to suggest I am a naive idiot. There is nothing to suggest I am a Nazi terrorist supporter.
>>4 Evil can be defined and exists, I do not allow it to affect my judgement.
>>5 Now we determine what we can learn from this.
>>6 Whether it's evil or not is determinned by science, not opinions.
>>7 Political science works in the same way as ideologies except it cannot use logical fallacies or demagoguery to convince others.
>>8 I use this definition of evil, "Evil is a cause of sufferring unto sapient beings", which makes me a moral universalist. >>4 is a moral relativist.
>>9 I believe >>8 jumped to a conclusion.
>>10 It is profound, just not to people whom the truth in this subject holds any use.
>>11 Perhaps post implied I am a moral relativist, but that is not the case.

Name: Anonymous 2008-03-09 12:04

There is no morality involved in the scientific method, or in science in general. You get data and results, period.
To say that you can use the scientific method to take apart a totally subjective concept like evil is ludicrous.
The words science and evil should never intersect or have anything to do with each other.
OP should be banned for life for suggesting such shitniggery.

Name: Anonymous 2008-03-09 12:16

>>12
There is nothing to suggest I am a naive idiot.
Does misspelling naïve count?

Name: Anonymous 2008-03-09 15:37

>>13 http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/evil
>>14 http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/naive

Name: Anonymous 2008-03-09 16:02

>>15
>>14 here. You don't read books much, do you?

Name: RedCream 2008-03-09 23:49

>>13
FAIL MUCH?  Talk to one of these religitards.  By avoiding the involvement of their farcical religion, you're ONLY being the EVIL of their thinking.  Yep, that's right:  Not being of their faith, you're largely the EVIL of their faith.

So according to them, by conducting science like that, and specifically avoiding moral judgment in what you do, you're EVIL.

Hey, I don't make these kind of silly rules.  Talk to the religitards.  But ... oh, yeh, there's no point in talking to THEM.  They're INSANE.  So you're stuck.

Name: Anonymous 2008-03-10 1:22

>>13
Evolutionary origins of morality, nigger. WHAT NOW?

Name: Anonymous 2008-03-10 6:25

>>16 This is how we spell things on the internet. Gb2 library bookfag.
>>17 Evil has a definition. http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/evil

Name: Anonymous 2008-03-10 8:30

>>13
I don't give 2 shits about what the religious think about anything. We're talking about the scientific method here and applying it to the concept of evil. The two have nothing to do with each other.
>>18 So what's your point? Everything that exists has an evolution to it.

Name: Anonymous 2008-03-10 8:31

My bad >>13 should be >>17

Name: Anonymous 2008-03-10 9:20

>>20 Scientific method can be used to define evil.

Name: Anonymous 2008-03-10 13:30

>>22
You're obviously a result of scientific inbreeding.

Name: Anonymous 2008-03-10 14:36

>>20
So what's your point? Everything that exists has an evolution to it.
You're either a deliberately obtuse troll or a retarded dipshit. Which is it?

Name: Anonymous 2008-03-10 14:45

sa

Name: Anonymous 2008-03-10 14:54

>>24
You know I'm right.
Now go sodomize your mother.

Name: Anonymous 2008-03-11 8:15

>>26
oh noez someone insulted mi on teh internets

;-;

Name: 4tran 2008-03-11 8:40

>>26
This is 4chan.  I am sodomizing my mother as I type.

Name: Anonymous 2008-03-11 15:18

>>28
for the failed abortion?

Name: Anonymous 2008-03-11 19:31

>>1

>I prefer not to define enemies as the ultimate evil as some view Osama Bin Laden and Hitler

lrn2 war bitch! you are with us or you are with them!

Name: Anonymous 2008-03-15 12:01

Political science works when you're not living  the effects of your decisions. It's easy to send young boys to war when you're not going.

Name: Anonymous 2008-03-15 13:45

>>31
liberal pussyfag.

Name: Anonymous 2008-03-15 14:01

>>32
haha you are steeped in US politics

Name: Anonymous 2008-03-15 14:58

>>33
Pussy liberalfag.

Name: Anonymous 2008-03-15 15:10

>>34
Liberal pussyfag

Name: Anonymous 2008-03-16 15:00

>>35
OK now you are just being Tourette'sy.

Name: Anonymous 2008-03-18 1:10

>>36
now you are FUCK SHIT FAGGOT NIIGGA

Name: Anonymous 2008-03-18 1:15

>>31
Science can be used for good aswell as evil. Would you rather send 100000 young boys to their deaths or millions of people now and in the future to live under a fascist dictatorship?

Name: Anonymous 2008-03-18 3:20

the dictatorship sounds way cool

Name: Anonymous 2008-03-18 9:12

Yeah, I'm definetly down with the dictatorship.
I'd get in real good with them right from the beginning and achieve a respectable level of authority in their regime.
Then I'd have all my friends and enemies executed.
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List
All trademarks and copyrights on this site are owned by their respective parties. All comments and posts are the responsibility of their own posters.
- Tinychan + 2ch Mode -