Political science.

I'm not into ideologies and such faggotry. I prefer rational objective proper empirical methods into deducing what decisions are/were best. Not just in ordinary applications but also socially unacceptable instances, for instance I prefer not to define enemies as the ultimate evil as some view Osama Bin Laden and Hitler, I view them for what they are and I do the same with all other controversial subjects. I get the impression many are offended by my objectivity since they fear that someone who delves so deep into their opponent's ideals may be convinced by them, I am often mistaken for a naive idiot but in truth I merely seek to understand what makes such people tick.

Discuss.

>>13
FAIL MUCH?  Talk to one of these religitards.  By avoiding the involvement of their farcical religion, you're ONLY being the EVIL of their thinking.  Yep, that's right:  Not being of their faith, you're largely the EVIL of their faith.

So according to them, by conducting science like that, and specifically avoiding moral judgment in what you do, you're EVIL.

Hey, I don't make these kind of silly rules.  Talk to the religitards.  But ... oh, yeh, there's no point in talking to THEM.  They're INSANE.  So you're stuck.