PROOF there's a God

   1. I exist

   2. I have in my mind the notion of a perfect being

   3. An imperfect being, like myself, cannot think up the notion of a perfect being

   4. Therefore the notion of a perfect being must have originated from the perfect being himself

   5. A perfect being would not be perfect if it did not exist

   6. Therefore a perfect being must exist

Premise #2 and/or premise #3 are crap, depending on what you mean by "notion".
#5 is crap as well, though that's not necessarily immediately obvious since it's very badly worded. As stated, it's a plain non-sequitur, in the colloquial sense of the word.

If you're trying to get at the ontological argument, you're misremembering it.

So I take it you're taking a Philosophy class right now?

Also; lol, pineal glands.

Philosophers are in agreement that this thread is retarded.

>>5
Philosophers are too busy masturbating to even read anything.
This thread is a good example why nobody likes them.

>>1

cocks, cocks, cocks!

(2) you don't have notion of a perfect being, but you have a notion of a being with individual traits such that you label them perfect because of their significance to you.

you can not imagine a being having quality X such that it is incomprehensible by you therefore all beings you can imagine are modifications of yourself.

therefore you fail. eat aids and die!

Butt-hurt atheists angry that philosophy and not science has proved God exists.

>>7
HAY!  You're not COCKS COCKS COCKS guy.  I am!  So dick off.

>>9

I'm the new COCKS COCKS COCKS guy. Didn't you get the memo?

   1. I exist

   2. I have in my mind the notion of Gilgamesh

   3. An imperfect being, like myself, cannot think up the notion of Gilgamesh

   4. Therefore the notion of Gilgamesh must have originated from Gilgamesh himself

   5. Gilgamesh would not be perfect if he did not exist

   6. Therefore Gilgamesh must exist

   1. I exist

   2. I have in my mind the perfect idea of THIS THREAD IS FAIL.

   3. An imperfect being, like myself, cannot think up such a perfect idea.

   4. Therefore the notion of THIS THREAD IS FAIL must have originated from THIS THREAD IS FAIL

   5. THIS THREAD IS FAIL would not be perfect if THIS THREAD IS FAIL was untrue

   6. Therefore THIS THREAD IS FAIL is true


>>1
If existence is necessary for perfection, then if god does not exist, then it is not a perfect idea, full stop. Your argument fails because it assumed that the idea of god was perfect but that would not be true if it were nonexistent. This merely shows that the idea of perfection is not necessarily perfect itself, it existence is necessary for perfection.

>>11
WOMEN AND CHILDREN

>>13
DON'T HELP HIM!

>>10
I challenge you to a duel!
COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS

Ideas are not evidence.

RELIGITARDS PWNT AGAIN!

Your stories of your Big Jew In The Sky relate all manner of evidence for it.  Just produce this evidence or STFU (and admit that you fell for children's fables).

>>16
btw clone redcrem will never said pwn or tards
he always writte in a polite way (he troll's around educated)