Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon.

Pages: 1-

New theory of everything

Name: Anonymous 2007-11-16 7:56

oh shi-
i knew string theory was loads of crap.
I would like to know if someone (redcream) could give a simple explanation of an E8 Lie group.

Name: Anonymous 2007-11-16 14:59

ITT people getting their science from Slashdot.
That's like learning to program by watching Hollywood movies.

Name: Anonymous 2007-11-16 15:11

String theory is actually the most widely accepted theory of the makeup of, well, everything.

Research it a little bit you retard. Watch NOVA or something, Jesus.

I bet you think the Earth is flat, too, right? Go fuck yourself pussy.

Name: Anonymous 2007-11-16 17:12

String Theory IS loads of crap!  11 dimensions?  PROVE IT!

Name: RedCream 2007-11-16 22:08

I'm sorry OP but I cannot deliver the explanation you are asking for because I am actually underage B&. I'm in a third grade remedial class and my hobbies include smelling my finger after I have shoved it in my anus.

Name: Anonymous 2007-11-16 22:50

>>3
The Nova miniseries on string theory was Excellent.
String theory is interesting and promising, probably can't ever prove it's true (or any theory dealing with what's OUTSIDE our universe)

Name: Anonymous 2007-11-17 1:06

Ehh...Loop Quantum Gravity sets up a much better framework than does String Theory, insofar as their work on lattice structures and spin-networks at the sub-subatomic scale.

Name: Anonymous 2007-11-17 2:08

>>7
"sub-subatomic scale" is the stupidest phrase ever. Subatomic = smaller than atomic, sub-subatomic = smaller than smaller than atomic? That doesn't even mean anything. It's like saying "less than less than 5."

Name: Anonymous 2007-11-17 17:19

>>4

Good luck trying to prove a physical phenominon. But if it can accurately predict all physical interactions, who cares whether the universe really is of dimension 11?

Name: Anonymous 2007-11-17 18:06

>>8

If space is quantum, the largest sub-subatomic volume is strictly smaller than the largest subatomic volume, nigger.

Name: Anonymous 2007-11-17 18:34

>>10
Do you hear yourself talk?

Name: Anonymous 2007-11-17 19:34

String Theory is only String Mathematics until they make some falsifiable predictions.

SPOILER: This new theory is bullshit too.

Name: Anonymous 2007-11-18 1:28

im gonna solve this dilemma guyz

Name: Anonymous 2007-11-18 1:41

He mixes bosons and fermions. It's not supersymmetry but it's not exactly plausible either.

Name: Anonymous 2007-11-18 15:00

Well this theory actually makes testable predictions, so thats a big deal right there. And no free parameters, the numbers are actually a consequence of the math instead of plugged in.

That said, the exact way he's doing it probably isn't right, because of the different way to use the math. But its good enough that we should finally be able to kill off fucking string theory. God that shit is awful.

Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List