RedCream Survey

The statement in http://dis.4chan.org/read/sci/1189059679/4 is
a) true
b) false
c) don't know
d) impossible to determine
e) bullshit/lol/troll
f) other

RedCream is
a) douche
b) not a douche
c) somewhere in the middle
d) other

My personal response is (e,c).
Perhaps with this survey, he will stop requesting proof/evidence in the form of surveys.

>>1
But a jpeg, put forth as evidence of Gilgamesh, that is obviously not a pic of Gilgamesh, is not evidence of Gilgamesh or any divinity.  Statements that purport prove the existence of a divinity (or statements that take such existence as a given) need to be proven before sensible discourse on such a topic can commence.  Why is this so hard for you gayfailers to understand?  Oh, yeh, that's right:  because you're all alone in a cold and uncaring universe where you're just going to die.  Most of Humanity is simply not able to handle that truth ... hence, the emo reactions from 4channers when forced to face it.

There simply isn't a "god".  There is no big brother hovering over your shoulder, somehow making sure you come to no harm yet you still end up assailed by random events in life anyway.  If there was such an entity we'd have ample evidence due to it being so pervasive.  Yet we have ZERO such evidence.  Hence, isn't it time for you Humans to grow up and put the reptilian fears behind?  I made the leap, and now I live in reality.  So should you.

>>2
OH RLLY?

>>3
Yes, really.  As commonly defined, this proposed divinity is omnipresent and has exhibited intense and personal interest in Humanity.  Once the cameras and detection equipment appeared, however, there's been no sign whatsoever of this divinity.  Rational men see that the obvious and overwhelming result is that there WAS NO divinity and that the previous stories were just fictions.  Wherever the fuck we look, we don't see a "god" anywhere.  Those who allegedly do are unable to duplicate the observations, or devolve into nonsensical statements (like "beauty proves God exists") which only demonstrates their insanity.

>>4
RLLY?

>>4
gj proving some random thing you made up a definition for doesnt exist.

a^2

>>6
The irony here is that this divinity doesn't exist.  Submit evidence for it's existence or STFU, moron.  I'm talking about EVIDENCE, moron, not logic games and stupid statements.

I am such a troll.

to redcream:
a flying castle is a castle that flight?
>>bebedora

e and a

I hate redcream, he's annoying :(