Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

RedCream Survey

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-10 4:51 ID:9My7j7dg

The statement in http://dis.4chan.org/read/sci/1189059679/4 is
a) true
b) false
c) don't know
d) impossible to determine
e) bullshit/lol/troll
f) other

RedCream is
a) douche
b) not a douche
c) somewhere in the middle
d) other

My personal response is (e,c).
Perhaps with this survey, he will stop requesting proof/evidence in the form of surveys.

Name: RedCream 2007-09-10 6:06 ID:x3+hcpdj

>>3
Yes, really.  As commonly defined, this proposed divinity is omnipresent and has exhibited intense and personal interest in Humanity.  Once the cameras and detection equipment appeared, however, there's been no sign whatsoever of this divinity.  Rational men see that the obvious and overwhelming result is that there WAS NO divinity and that the previous stories were just fictions.  Wherever the fuck we look, we don't see a "god" anywhere.  Those who allegedly do are unable to duplicate the observations, or devolve into nonsensical statements (like "beauty proves God exists") which only demonstrates their insanity.

Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List